tlk2rn Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 In Charlotte people are raving over the play of WR Steve Smith. He is having a stellar season. But so is Santana Moss. They are putting up the identical numbers: Smith: 58 rec., 937 yds., 16.2 yds. per cth., longest reception 80, 9 tds. Moss: 53 rec., 935 yds., 17.6 yds. per cth., longest reception 78, 5 tds. They are the same type receiver, same size, same 40 everything. So who is the best, and who would you rather have on your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Showstopper Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 both are doing great, but as of now id have to give the edge to smith due to the # of tds, and i really couldnt decide as to which one id want on my team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Kenzo Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 I think both are having great seasons, Smith has more touchdowns, but I think Moss is more explosive. We'll just have to wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y100Rocks Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 Smith has been more consistant over the years. He's put up a 90 catch season before I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 Smith has been more consistant over the years. He's put up a 90 catch season before I believe. Not quite true. Both Smith's and Moss' career's are similar. The year Steve Smith had 88 catches, 1110 yards and 7 TDs. Santana that same season had 74 catches 1105 yards and 10 TDs. Their numbers are eerily similar . They are both at the exact same point in their career's. I'd have to call it a push. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 Moss only has to get 5 catches for 2 yards to tie with Smith right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 I thought only big-bodied receivers were supposed to be any good in the 2005 version of the NFL... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReefa Posted November 18, 2005 Share Posted November 18, 2005 If Smith and Moss aren't lining up opposite each other in Hawaii, there's something seriously wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I can't pick one. I think they're clearly the top two in the NFC right this minute, but can't say which is which. As for the second part of the question. I definitely want Santana on my team. There is not a single receiver, and probably not a single player, that I'd trade him straight up for right now. That's saying a lot, considering I thought the trade to get him was a mistake. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagles_Legendz Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I like both as WRs, though I guess I'd prefer Smith, because I think he's probably the toughest WR in the game now not named Hines Ward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Yes, Smith has more TD's, but Moss is much more explosive after the catch. Smith is a good deep receiver. Moss can do almost everything, including being an excellent key blocker when needed. Moss > Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedsSKINS_7 Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 they're both great but moss is one of those receivers who gives the team something extra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Moss. But I am biased.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Really if you look at it objectively, they're both evenly matched and before this season started most would have picked Smith if given the choice. However Moss is a Redskin and a MNF hero who has already cemented a spot in Redskins lore. He's the choice of discerning Redskins fans everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 In Charlotte people are raving over the play of WR Steve Smith. He is having a stellar season. But so is Santana Moss. They are putting up the identical numbers:Smith: 58 rec., 937 yds., 16.2 yds. per cth., longest reception 80, 9 tds. Moss: 53 rec., 935 yds., 17.6 yds. per cth., longest reception 78, 5 tds. They are the same type receiver, same size, same 40 everything. So who is the best, and who would you rather have on your team. Trade Lavar arington for smith then we could have 2 barn burners. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4SB Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I'm going to get bashed for this, but I believe Smith is having the better year than Moss. Moss is getting a lot of his yards off screens whereas Smith is catching balls and getting by defenders in the open field to get most of his yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I love Moss don't get me wrong, but I'd prefer Smith because he plays the game a bit more physical than Santana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I'm going to get bashed for this, but I believe Smith is having the better year than Moss. Moss is getting a lot of his yards off screens whereas Smith is catching balls and getting by defenders in the open field to get most of his yards. ????? Moss had one WR screen play break open, the one against KC. Where have you not seen Moss get by DB's to get yardage this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueTalon Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 I really believe that while both players possess great talent, their success is partially due to the systems they play in. I think if they were to swap teams, both of their numbers would falter initially -- and perhaps long term as well. (As an example, look at Randy Moss.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcarey032 Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 It may sound biased, but I would rather have moss. I know that Steve Smith has had a great season and he started to get recognition during the playoffs two years ago, but Moss has always been a great player in New York. They just didn't give the ball to him enough. I would say that last year during the playoffs during the steelers he made that huge punt return for touchdown in the playoffs and who could forget the two clutch touchdown receptions that he made against Dallas. In my mind, he is the true Cowboy Killa! So my nod goes to moss, even though smith is on my fantasy team and I got him in steal in a late round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seancarter Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Even though Moss didn't get the ball alot and rack up a whole bunch of yards and td's for the Jets last year, he averaged 18.6 yards a catch, and Smith averaged 12.6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.