JimmiJo Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 It boggles the mind that after watching THE COMEBACK of the decade, one that will be remembered and mentioned for years, you PR-homers/Brunell-haters are still at it. We won, IN DALLAS We have won two in a row for the first time in two years. We won on two (no, not one), count them, two BOMBS. We converted 3-4th downs WE BEAT THE FRIGGIN' COWBOYS!!! So, here's my poll, enjoy it with a nice hot cup of STFU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHUBAKAH Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 It boggles the mind that after watching THE COMEBACK of the decade, one that will remembered and mentioned for years, you PR-homers/Brunell-haters are still at it.We won, IN DALLAS We have won two in a row for the first time in two years. We won on two (no, not one), count them, two BOMBS. We converted 3-4th downs WE BEAT THE FRIGGIN' COWBOYS!!! So, here's my poll, enjoy it with a nice hot cup of STFU. :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TODD Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Yawn I've only seen 45 of these threads today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted September 21, 2005 Author Share Posted September 21, 2005 YawnI've only seen 45 of these threads today. And yet you participate, way to hang in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVCChairman Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 And yet you participate, way to hang in... :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: Thanks for that, what's funny is i've seen this since i've been on this board, you dont like the thread, let it go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 YawnI've only seen 45 of these threads today. Is that all? Did Brunell have two great throws at the end of the game? He sure did. Did I see him toss the ball into the dirt on multiple occasions? I sure did. Did I see him underthrow what should have been a touchdown and was instead almost intercepted? Yes I did. We won. I'm happy. Brunell is not our savior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted September 21, 2005 Author Share Posted September 21, 2005 Is that all? Did Brunell have two great throws at the end of the game? He sure did. Did I see him toss the ball into the dirt on multiple occasions? I sure did. Did I see him underthrow what should have been a touchdown and was instead almost intercepted? Yes I did. We won. I'm happy. Brunell is not our savior. He was last night, huh? And what of the other throws? The 4th-down converts? And what of the super-money 25 yard scramble? Could P-Man do that? Maybe - but he didn't It was our 35-year old veteran that a host of haters swore could never bring us success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamSneed36 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 It boggles the mind that after watching THE COMEBACK of the decade, one that will be remembered and mentioned for years, you PR-homers/Brunell-haters are still at it.We won, IN DALLAS We have won two in a row for the first time in two years. We won on two (no, not one), count them, two BOMBS. We converted 3-4th downs WE BEAT THE FRIGGIN' COWBOYS!!! So, here's my poll, enjoy it with a nice hot cup of STFU. :notworthy: :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSilverMaC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Maybe you should STFU. Unless you watched a different game than I did, I saw brunell: throw an INT Take 5 Sacks Over and UNDER throw multiple recievers, multiple times. Had brunell been the QB you guys act like he was, we would have won that game 28-7. So like I said, do us a favor and STFU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinster Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Is that all? Did Brunell have two great throws at the end of the game? He sure did. Did I see him toss the ball into the dirt on multiple occasions? I sure did. Did I see him underthrow what should have been a touchdown and was instead almost intercepted? Yes I did. We won. I'm happy. Brunell is not our savior. Hmm, to just think back only one week ago we had a QB take his first 4 drives...and he created 0 points, and had 1 Int. 2 fumbles.. Damn if thats not the perfect guy! Whats perfect? You show me somthing perfect and i'll show you somthing thats not! Sorry had to pull a Seabiscuit verse! Who needs perfect, if can you toss the ball like that to win the game @ Dallas and see the crowd take that painfull loss!! :notworthy Although i'll tell ya if we have anymore nail biters like that my heart may just POP!!! :point2sky Skinster Skin 4 Life!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaSkin Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Maybe you should STFU.Take 5 Sacks You know what? Sometimes taking the sack is the right thing to do. When the pocket is breaking down and there is nowhere to go with the ball. Even the sack that knocked us out of field goal range. Brunell looked up and had defenders in his face, he had now way to safely get rid of the ball, so he covered up and took the sack. We keep position, punt and pin 'em deep. The pass protection was not good last night. But Brunell played smart, made few mistakes and then WON THE GAME FOR US. Somehow you'd think WINNING the game with great plays would count for a little, but I guess not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 :doh: give it a rest, enjoy a big win for a week, before we start ****ing about QB's or other stuff freaking relax, and watch poke fans turn on each other! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Fence Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 The problem with all of the banter on this thread is the lack deliberative analysis. Yes Brunell won the game with some wonderful throws, but he also played terribly, along with the rest of the O, for the first 56 minutes. Ramsey might not have been able to pull the game out, but we can't get all over Brunell's jock until we see consistency. Consistency= Playoffs A big win against Dallas has made my month, but the playoffs would make my year. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSilverMaC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 You know what? Sometimes taking the sack is the right thing to do. When the pocket is breaking down and there is nowhere to go with the ball. Even the sack that knocked us out of field goal range. Brunell looked up and had defenders in his face, he had now way to safely get rid of the ball, so he covered up and took the sack. We keep position, punt and pin 'em deep. The pass protection was not good last night. But Brunell played smart, made few mistakes and then WON THE GAME FOR US. Somehow you'd think WINNING the game with great plays would count for a little, but I guess not. Sure, great. All I know is there were 5 chances to score either a TD or a FG, and brunell only allowed us to do it twice. Thats only 40%. Now, I will be fair here and say that Ramsey probably wouldn't have hit the second TD pass to Moss, cause that was a pure touch pass, but the first one was underthrown by brunell and off target. The first chance for Moss was severely underthrown, and nearly picked off. And the underthrow/off target one to Patten would have been gold from Ramsey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hands11 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 He was last night, huh? And what of the other throws? The 4th-down converts? And what of the super-money 25 yard scramble? Could P-Man do that? Maybe - but he didn't It was our 35-year old veteran that a host of haters swore could never bring us success. And yet he posted better numbers then Drew http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20050919_WAS@DAL Odd. Parcell, one of the best coaches ever has Drew. He also won with a washed up Testi. Gibb, who is in the Hall, would rather play Brunell. Who as some of us saw in the preseason, can lead the team and can make the throw. But yet, you are smarter then both of them and agrue with those of use that arent to immature to put last year behind and see what he has done his whole career minus 1.5 years ( INJURIED ) ahhh, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishope Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 What's amazing is MB can't get a friggin break to save his life. Despite the fact that Ramsey had most of the snaps with the 1st string offense during camp and preseason, some of you blithering idiots continue to cut the guy no slack. Give him a friggin break...give him some friggin time with the offense...he's led us to 2 and friggin 0. Get a friggin life and enjoy this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hands11 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Maybe you should STFU.Unless you watched a different game than I did, I saw brunell: throw an INT Take 5 Sacks Over and UNDER throw multiple recievers, multiple times. Had brunell been the QB you guys act like he was, we would have won that game 28-7. So like I said, do us a favor and STFU. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20050911_DAL@SD How many sacks did Dallas have against Drew Brees the week before ? answer. 4 How many INTs 2 Completion %50 How many games has Brunell started against starting Ds this year ? 1 How many games has be started with his starting WRs 1 So you take maybe the best QB in the league last years and put his stats against Brunells who has started 1 game and I'd say, maybe Dallas has an awesome defense and Brunell did pretty dame well and help us win. Better the D Brees did against them the week before and he is playing in and offense that is established with LT, maybe the best RB in the league and with WRs he knows well. So, one more time STFU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishomelette Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 And yet he posted better numbers then Drewhttp://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20050919_WAS@DAL Odd. Parcell, one of the best coaches ever has Drew. He also won with a washed up Testi. Gibb, who is in the Hall, would rather play Brunell. Who as some of us saw in the preseason, can lead the team and can make the throw. But yet, you are smarter then both of them and agrue with those of use that arent to immature to put last year behind and see what he has done his whole career minus 1.5 years ( INJURIED ) ahhh, yeah. Yikes...It's difficult to be a weiner with a washed-up testi :twitch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefre1217 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 im still here! and by the way Brunell still stunk! winning in Dallas was Great! but it doesnt change the facts. fact is MB at QB hurts this team, thinking otherwise is ignorant at best. unless you only watched 4 minutes of the game. as for the MB supporter (I will refer to them as jocks) if your think him at QB is good for the future of this team, your stuck in 1990 with JG! He's terrible, and if the ratio continues he will be effective for a wopping total 70 minutes all season, good luck stacking your hopes to that! MB sucked last nite, get used to it, it will happen all year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalecitymike Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 What team in the NFL wouldn't want a clutch 4 quater QB? If he plays like crap all game long, and pulls out a victory in the 4th quater every week than how can you not be happy? A win is a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalecitymike Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I think that if we had a solution at the RB, and could actually get first downs on a regular basis without having to throw hail mary plays we wouldn't be talking about the qb problem at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefre1217 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 What team in the NFL wouldn't want a clutch 4 quater QB? If he plays like crap all game long, and pulls out a victory in the 4th quater every week than how can you not be happy? A win is a win. you couldnt give MB away to any team right now! they wouldnt take him! he sucks! how can I not be happy? i saw what MB did last year, and its the same this year! the win against dallas was great but in the grand scheme of things it will do more harm than good. MB will suck like he did last year and like he did against Chicago and the first 3 1/2 quarters of the dallas. Playing any other QB would be a better move for the long term development of this team than letting MB play. buy playing PR or even JC atleast we will be building on the future, but right now with MB under center, this season is over, and probably worse than last year! he cant move the ball, has no arm, completes zero mid-range passes, he is awful! and frankly he made all the same mistakes PR makes (overthown balls, underthrown balls, INT's even a fumble) he also land 2 deep passes which PR is also known to do, so frankly playing PR makes more sense, atleast he can get better were as MB will only continue to get worse! if you dont like PR then play JC, but this is a lost season with MB under center. we maybe 2-0 but have been outscored by 27 other teams already, this offense sucks with MB at QB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefre1217 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I think that if we had a solution at the RB, and could actually get first downs on a regular basis without having to throw hail mary plays we wouldn't be talking about the qb problem at all. you support MB but question Portis? are you alright? meds not working? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 What team in the NFL wouldn't want a clutch 4 quater QB? If he plays like crap all game long, and pulls out a victory in the 4th quater every week than how can you not be happy? A win is a win. Sure, it's nice to have a guy that doesn't crack under pressure when the chips are down, and we surely have that in Brunell. Think about what your saying here. You want to play from behind every week? I sure as hell dont. Brunell has proven many of us wrong in that he can get the ball down field farther then 20 yards. He hit on 2 out of 5, and I can live with that for a few early season games. His timing will get better with the other recievers as the weeks pass. It has too, and I think it will. What bothers me is that we only played well when our back was against the wall. Mark really didn't do any better then Ramsey in more then three quaters. Do I want a QB change................... NO, That would be the worst thing for this team, but Mark has to step it up throughout the entire game and get it down field on a consistant bassis. If not, Portis will have a very long season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark327 Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 What's amazing is MB can't get a friggin break to save his life. Despite the fact that Ramsey had most of the snaps with the 1st string offense during camp and preseason, some of you blithering idiots continue to cut the guy no slack. Give him a friggin break...give him some friggin time with the offense...he's led us to 2 and friggin 0. Get a friggin life and enjoy this! :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.