These debates usually don't go well, so I've just been reading the last 2 days.. But something that I believe both sides should be able to get on board with, is holding the media responsible for sensationalizing the names/faces of these killers.. The Sheriff in Oregon said they didn't want to give his name or bring any attention to him, and as Im watching NBC's Lester Holt report on it, he reaffirms the Sheriffs request, and the very next sentence is the killers full name and a picture posted of him taking up 2/3 of the tv screen.. IMO, the act of killing people is just a part of these psycho's agenda. The fame and notoriety play a big part too.. That's something we could take away, if we wanted to..
As for sensible gun laws, Im a CCW holder and all for it. Problem is, to date no one has presented any such thing.. These bills are labeled as "sensible" and as soon as you start reading the details you see there's 1 thing that is sensible and about 10 that totally kill any chance of it actually passing..
Someone asked about a good guy with a gun stopping a bad guy.. It happens more than some think. Google "Good guy with a gun".. I'll admit, I didn't read all the stories, I don't need to be convinced. But it happens, you just don't hear about it much because there's no major sensationalism for the media to exploit..