Renegade7

You have no idea how bad an idea that is. It's hard enough as it is getting men to get help they need. Can we even name a prescribed medication that doesn't have some risk of depression as a side effect?

Most lockdown procedures I've been apart of have kept you where you are. I'd imagine in an active shooter situation, unless your section of the building is secure, you shouldn't go anywhere, stay in the locked room. What are they doing in schools these days for lockdown procedures? Anyone's kids talk to them about it in 2019?

Some of y'all don't get how layers of security work and that's why this conversation is going in circles. Newtown shooter shot through the glass to get in the building. It changes that situation dramatically when the shooter can't get in the building, that's the goal here. Would the glass be enough by itself, that's not the goal or the point, that was first thing he tried so if it was bulletproof he would've had to find another way in the building that he probably didn't plan for with school now aware that he's trying from hearing gunfire at the front door. Door locks and bullet proof glass are two layers that really are worth the investment of not having more kids killed. Keep them out the building or at from going from room to room. When we are talking cost benefit, we have to keep in mind that one side of the chart is people dying, not servers going down. Pretty much every mass shooting in this thread happened at a non-private residency, so I don't get why you even brought this up. This ain't mad max, but this mass shooting thing is the new norm, costing lives us trying to grapple with that, we're here now.

This conversation makes me uncomfortable. Would you rather have Curry on the floor for offense then Jordan? That take is still emitting thermal radiation.

I know this correlation and its a dangerous one in the context of this conversation. This is about stopping mass shootings in schools and enclosed buildinga, this is not the same as not locking your gun up at home correctly. In clubs armed personnel is a deterrent and some places in north Carolina trying to make it a requirement based on number of people. We're talking past deterrent once they are already in the building shooting, then what? The question we need to ask is are yalls worst case scenarios outweighing these worst case scenarios happening everyday? Are more people getting killed in friendly fire during mass shootings then the actual mass shooting itself? Every situation or scenario has this thing called acceptable risk because zero risk is impossible (or worth something no one wants to give up)

Slow down, we're not talking about random people running around to save the day, that's the teacher with guns plan. You train for stuff like that and hope for the best. What, don't send SWAT in because they might shot each other, what's the higher risk for lose of life, having no one there for immediate response or someone there?

That's a training issue, not a reason to say that won't help. Someone has to show up first, if anything to help relay scope of the situation to the help that's supposed to coming.

Ted is an idiot, we are doomed. Might as well give him the job then, wow.

I mean, Jesus, even this is better then nothing

You wouldn't even notice if the glass is bulletproof and they typically have an armed guard in their now anyway. Bs, 2-3% show me the numbers, we talking about eliminating schools as a soft target, not trying to factor in how often it happens, it happens now more then ever, doing nothing based on percentages is a cop out.

That's because every DMV I've ever been in in NOVA and Hampton Roads has at least one or two armed security guards now.

Caskets are expensive too, this sounds like an investment and worth it. You don't judge mass transit by how much money it makes, you judge it by how many cars it takes off the road. Most metrorail systems like New York and dc run a deficit, but can you imagine those cities without one? This is a big picture conversation, defense budget is $700 billion plus annually and your comparing that to $25 billion all together?

Bruh, two jobs ago someone walked all the way from outside into my managers office accusing an employ of finding her cell phone and keeping. Her reaction to her brother who owned the company was locking the f'n front doors, buzz people in, all they had to do was enable it. But no, he wanted the company to be inviting. That's his own sister bro, we are past the point of reevaluating this whole office space being inviting thing, its not a f'n public park, its private property. That's not the point, there a millions of soft targets all over the country this would effect, think of how many school killings this could've limited? How many come in the building and go room to room like this and Virginia Tech?

That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a minute now. Why are taking this conversation to putting barbed wire everywhere? Every door in a public place should be able to lock to prevent entry and bulletproof glass mandatory. If these school districts can figure this out, there's no reason rest of us can't http://www.dailyjournal.net/2019/03/22/clarkpleasant_to_add_21_million_in_security_cameras_door_locks/

I don't for a second believe Whoopi smokes like that. Is this something I'm just flat out wrong on? Could a put Montell Williams in there, that's an interesting convo.

They just showed the Warriors had 20-0 run if you count before halftime, first time since the merger in the finals

This was the Raptor's chicxulub

I disagree. Raptors had 5 minutes to overcome a single digit lead with no KD or Klay on the floor and couldn't get it done. They are done.

Jez, they gave Green so little respect at the top of the key he almost got to the rim.

Cousins got too excited there

Are counting injured players as depth? I get what your saying, but that's a different team without KD or Klay. If they can't overcome single digits here at home they deserve to lose the series.

How is VanVleet more light skinned then Curry? I forgot that shade was possible.

Play is not on the floor and they can still lose this game. I'd argue Raptors have more depth at that point, but not the players to get it done if they lose, which looks like is bought to happen.

Toronto has all their guys and at home, there's no excuse.