Monkart Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod The biggest stat you need to see is that he was 0-4 with Wannsteadt as head coach and 3-3 without Wanny...including a win over the back to back super bowl champions. I would say that is much improved from the beginning of the year. And if it wasn't for the fins D they wouldn't have won that game against the Pats, Also he was lucky to have an Ex-Redskin to catch the game winning TD. So it's about time for you to:stfu: :phinsuck: :phinsuck: :phinsuck: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarinoEqualsGod Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by Monkart And if it wasn't for the fins D they wouldn't have won that game against the Pats, Also he was lucky to have an Ex-Redskin to catch the game winning TD. So it's about time for you to:stfu: :phinsuck: :phinsuck: :phinsuck: Please...Thompson is garbage. That's why a potential liability (but also a potential asset) in David Boston is replacing him as the team's number 3 reciever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarinoEqualsGod Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 wins over San Fran and Cleveland (who had quit by then) hardly impressive, and the Pats win was more because of Brady's mistakes (4 Int.s) than anything Feeley did. in those wins the Stats clearly show it was team victories nothing suggests Feeley did anything special to give him the credit. If Feeley doesn't throw the pass where he did at the end, it would have been a loss. Feeley controlled the game better than he had all season with 0 INT. He may not have made spectacular plays, but he didn't make any stupid mistakes....the same stupid mistakes that cost the 'Fins 3 or 4 wins. I'd like to see how the 'Skins would do in the AFC East, which is the toughest division in the toughest conference in football. Not making excuses...just saying that if the 'Fins were in the NFC, they would have won at least 6 games, probably 8. They did go 2-2 against the weaker conference last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 :yawnee: more excuses, more bravado, and again no real facts to back up you big talk you came in trash talking, and making big claims about Feeley and the Phin's.... not once have you provided anything concrete to justify your ramblings....... if bragging about Feeley not throwing an Int. in only 1 game as proof he is going to be the QB of the future in Miami.... you better rethink your logic please, come back when you have something worthwhile to discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarinoEqualsGod Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 :yawnee: more excuses, more bravado, and again no real facts to back up you big talk you came in trash talking, and making big claims about Feeley and the Phin's.... not once have you provided anything concrete to justify your ramblings....... if bragging about Feeley not throwing an Int. in only 1 game as proof he is going to be the QB of the future in Miami.... you better rethink your logic please, come back when you have something worthwhile to discuss "They did go 2-2 against the weaker conference last year." 2-2 times 4 = 8 wins genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod "They did go 2-2 against the weaker conference last year." 2-2 times 4 = 8 wins genius. that's speculation not fact "genius"...... bottom line, there is nothing at this point to even suggest the Dolphins will be good this upcoming season, or even better than the Redskins. They have an unproven rookie NFL head coach, No real QB, a Rookie RB, drafted on potential, 2 out of 3 WR are has beens, your OL is subpar, your defense is getting older, you have had big changes at cb, and question marks at LB. and the entire team is starting under a new system Your best player "may" come back after a year off drugging, and is 30-40 pounds underweight a month and a half before training camp... even if he returns... and then there will be locker room problems. All coming off the second worse record in the NFL last season. And as you pointed out they play in the AFC east.. one of the better divisions in the NFL. Simple logic would suggest even if all the cards fall in place, and everyone who is a question mark pans out (rarely happens) it is still a couple years before you could hope to be back in the playoffs again. So again.... come back when you have something worthwhile to discuss.... because talking smack about the Dolphins is a farce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarinoEqualsGod Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 that's speculation not fact "genius"...... bottom line, there is nothing at this point to even suggest the Dolphins will be good this upcoming season, or even better than the Redskins. And at this time last season, nothing suggested that they would be bad, after coming off a 10 win season. Bottom line: In today's NFL team's records can be the total opposite from year to year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod "They did go 2-2 against the weaker conference last year." 2-2 times 4 = 8 wins genius. Actually, 2 - 2 times 4 = 0 And what exactly are you saying? Why would you multiply that by four? Are you assuming they would have played ALL 16 games against the NFC? Because actually they would only play 12 games against the NFC, and 4 against the AFC. So at best, according to your fatally flawed logic, they would have 6 wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkart Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod Please...Thompson is garbage. That's why a potential liability (but also a potential asset) in David Boston is replacing him as the team's number 3 reciever. Yea, your right that's why we let him go to the giant Landfill you call Miami, to the owner who is a garbage man. thanks for straightening me out.:dunce: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod If Feeley doesn't throw the pass where he did at the end, it would have been a loss. And if the D doesn't come up with 4 interceptions it would have been a loss. Considering how close the game was, even with Brady's picks, I'm pretty sure anyone with half a brain would say the defense's contribution was way more significant than Feeley's. He threw 1 TD pass... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Originally posted by MarinoEqualsGod And at this time last season, nothing suggested that they would be bad, after coming off a 10 win season. Bottom line: In today's NFL team's records can be the total opposite from year to year. well.... no wonder you're talking so big Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDRoc Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 I believe Jacobs is the #2 since I think Patten is a slot receiver anyways. He was also the #3 on New England. IMO, this is Jacobs' year to step it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarinoEqualsGod Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Originally posted by jrockster77 And if the D doesn't come up with 4 interceptions it would have been a loss. Considering how close the game was, even with Brady's picks, I'm pretty sure anyone with half a brain would say the defense's contribution was way more significant than Feeley's. He threw 1 TD pass... Feeley still had to throw the ball...on a 4th and 10, no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.