heyholetsgogrant Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I have a sneaking suspicion that the first right teams to draft will not draft a QB, because their is simply no QB in the draft to build a franchise over. So now teams may fill other holes on their team. Also, dont be surprised if Pac-Man, Rolle, Edwards, and Williams are gone before we pick, so trading down will seem like the likely senario. 1 San Francisco- Edwards/maybe a runningback 2 Miami- Benson 3 Cleveland-Pac-Man 4 Chicago- Rolle 5 Tampa Bay-Mike Williams 6 Tennessee-Carnell Williams 7 Minnesota (from Oakland)- Merriman 8 Arizona- Carlos Rodgers 9 Washington-than us...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spm Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 If we're in position to draft either of those QBs, it would be a very interesting debate about what to do. It's tough not to take the best QB in the draft if he's available, but there might be some teams very interested in talking to us to trade up if that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island Boy Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I think if your situation worked out. Cleveland would have to take there QB of the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eparadox Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 We are not drafting a high round QB while Gibbs is around. If Ramsey truly sucks it up, then Joe would probably go Free Agency, as well as having low round QB prospects waiting in the wings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I'm pretty sure that one of the above (especially Cleveland, since they really have no QB right now), will draft a QB and/or a RB. Williams and Edwards will probably be gone before #9, hopefully Rolle will be there....that's who I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Tampa needs O line and RB help more than they need another WR. If he gets past Tenn at #6 and Minn at #7 he'll make it to #9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heyholetsgogrant Posted March 14, 2005 Author Share Posted March 14, 2005 I think if williams falls past tampa bay the viks will take him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soljaofjesus Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 If that happens lol I smell a Aaron Rodgers or Alex Smit for KGB and 3rd from green bay lol wouldn't do that though. doesn't KGB get tired easily? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clown Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 You have Cedric "Ricky" Benson and Cadilac going before Ronnie Brown :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I think either TB, SF or Chicago will take the top 2 WRs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsaddict Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 maybe one of those 2 qb's will fall to 9 and someone will want to trade with us for more picks. who needs a qb? I know the cowgirls do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clown Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I think either TB, SF or Chicago will take the top 2 WRs. I don't think Chicago will take another WR early in the draft because of their recent um...sucess with busts David Terrel and Dez White. i could easily be wrong.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinstzar Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Ronnie Brown is the best RB in the draft and he isn't on your board. Aaron Rodgers is coming out early and is definetly a quarterback you could build a franchise around. I do hope your right though because if it works out this way then Green Bay will give us lots of value to move up and draft Favre's replacement. Oh Yeah Derrick Johnson will go before Merriman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clown Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I do hope your right though because if it works out this way then Green Bay will give us lots of value to move up and draft Favre's replacement. that would be sweet...... a trade could be our 1st for their 1st 2nd and a mid-rounder..... Justin Miller and Marlin Jackson or possibly Carlos Rogers could be there at GB's pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Man it would suck if the top 3 CBs went before our pick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 yea cuz nevermind the fact that tennesse has chris brown...they need ANOTHER RB... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Pac Man at #3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 yea no offense dude but your mock draft of the first 8 is pretty bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I have a feeling it will go something like this as it is now 1 San Francisco - QB (Rodgers) 2 Miami RB (Benson) 3 Cleveland - defense (Derrick Johnson, Pac, Rolle) 4 Chicago - WR (Edwards) 5 Tampa Bay - RB (Williams) 6 Tennessee - defense (Derrick Johnson, Pac, Rolle) 7 Minnesota - WR (unless they pick up a FA) - Williams 8 Arizona- QB (Alex Smith) 9 Washington - Merriman, Rolle, Pac) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinker Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Last year was easy to project because we only had to predict four choices ahead of us and two of the teams were certainly taking qb's and Arizona and Oakland were almost certain to take Fitzgerald and Gallery. Trying to figure out 8 picks ahead of us with no consensus on the top player, much less the top qb or the top wr is mostly whimsical. Add to that there are still several wr's on the market (Plaxico and Gardner) and a few other fa's yet to sign that could change team's needs. Add still to that, not all the individual workouts have been done. A real mock draft is not going to make much sense until a week or two before the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clown Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I have a feeling it will go something like this as it is now HOW ARE U LEAVING OUT RONNIE BROWN:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 I just don't see how the Bears would pass on WR, espescially not for a CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgunner Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Anything can happen and it usually does. We should draft the best player available or trade down. :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers both went to Cal. Boller was the #2 pick in the draft. Rodgers is a much, much better QB than Boller....and he quit school as a Junior. The top 2 Qbs will be long gone by our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Pablo Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 Originally posted by tr1 Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers both went to Cal. Boller was the #2 pick in the draft. Rodgers is a much, much better QB than Boller....and he quit school as a Junior. The top 2 Qbs will be long gone by our pick. By #2 pick in the draft, I assume you mean #19. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.