TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/dallas-cowboys/headlines/20110419-columnist-cowboys_demarcus-ware-no.-3-player-in-nfl-tony-Romo sits to pee-not-a-top-12-qb.ece discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfWashington Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?346235-Prisco-Top-100-2-Skins-mentioned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 20, 2011 Author Share Posted April 20, 2011 for the record...I agree with the statement that reads "Any list that doesn't have Fletcher in the top 100 is a joke".......and in addition any list that puts Josh Freeman over Tony Romo sits to pee. Palease..........what a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Champskins Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Ware is a beast, Ill give ya that. If you guys would let him do the pre-game pep talk you might win a few more instead of that girly man Brooking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 20, 2011 Author Share Posted April 20, 2011 Ware is a beast, Ill give ya that. If you guys would let him do the pre-game pep talk you might win a few more instead of that girly man Brooking he is alright....nothing special,. its the scheme he is in that makes him great HAHA! I agree...Brooking is creepy when he tries to pump that team up..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Subjective lists are subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweedr01 Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 he is alright....nothing special,. its the scheme he is in that makes him great HAHA!I agree...Brooking is creepy when he tries to pump that team up..... "We're gonna bite, we're gonna scratch, we're gonna pull their hair, and we're gonna steal their Malibu barbie!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 "We're gonna bite, we're gonna scratch, we're gonna pull their hair, and we're gonna steal their Malibu barbie!" Pretty much. He is all rah-rah-rah, then disappears all game and gets subbed for Sean Lee lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Joe Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 for the record...I agree with the statement that reads "Any list that doesn't have Fletcher in the top 100 is a joke".......and in addition any list that puts Josh Freeman over Tony Romo sits to pee. Palease..........what a jokeI don't know. Freeman has done a an impressive job helping to turn around the Buccaneers. He's really young, and he's only going to get better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beans Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Hardly... Ware is not even unique in his skillset. There are plenty of similar 3-4 linebackers that are schemed to get as many sacks as Where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/dallas-cowboys/headlines/20110419-columnist-cowboys_demarcus-ware-no.-3-player-in-nfl-tony-Romo sits to pee-not-a-top-12-qb.ecediscuss ---------- Post added April-20th-2011 at 08:57 PM ---------- Since this has already been covered in ATN, one could only assume that this is spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 It's refreshing to not see Romo sits to pee-mania! No Redskins?....Fletcher, Landry, Orakpo? Edit - Never mind, I went off of the Dallas News article which stated "the Redskins had none." Reality is Orakpo and Moss made the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Schaub, Flacco, Cassel and Freeman with their zero combined playoff wins better than Romo sits to pee is somewhat amusing. Tony really does get no credit for being as good as he is behind what is a simply awful o-line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Schaub, Flacco, Cassel and Freeman with their zero combined playoff wins better than Romo sits to pee is somewhat amusing. Tony really does get no credit for being as good as he is behind what is a simply awful o-lineThe line hasn't been great yet not awful. I mean his C and TE have been a pro bowler for the last 3 or 4 years and for a couple years running it was the same with a T and a G. Not too many QB's can boast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 The line hasn't been great yet not awful. I mean his C and TE have been a pro bowler for the last 3 or 4 years and for a couple years running it was the same with a T and a G. Not too many QB's can boast. in 2010 Columbo was the worst starting tackle in football, and Davis a bottom 5 guard. In 2009 I think it was pretty obvious that Flozell Adams was clearly a shell of his former self. Romo sits to pee is very good at making that line look better than it really is and has been doing so since he became a starter. Gurode is a very good center other than his bad snaps, and Free was a very good LT last year, but two players don't make up for the rest of the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 in 2010 Columbo was the worst starting tackle in football, and Davis a bottom 5 guard. In 2009 I think it was pretty obvious that Flozell Adams was clearly a shell of his former self. Romo sits to pee is very good at making that line look better than it really is and has been doing so since he became a starter. Gurode is a very good center other than his bad snaps, and Free was a very good LT last year, but two players don't make up for the rest of the line.My point was none of other QB's you listed as being amusing to be ahead of Romo sits to pee have had any Pro Bowlers over the last few years. Plus....You must admit Freeman was impressive and energized a dreary team, Schaub has had a better passer rating than Romo sits to pee 2 years running and Flacco has had two good years in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blue Joe Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Schaub, Flacco, Cassel and Freeman with their zero combined playoff wins better than Romo sits to pee is somewhat amusing. Tony really does get no credit for being as good as he is behind what is a simply awful o-lineGiven the solid play of Jon Kitna this year, you really can't use the talent around Tony Romo sits to pee as an excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweedr01 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Schaub, Flacco, Cassel and Freeman with their zero combined playoff wins better than Romo sits to pee is somewhat amusing. Tony really does get no credit for being as good as he is behind what is a simply awful o-line not to burst your bubble champ (and quite surprised no one else pointed this out), but you do realize that flacco won 2 playoff games just as a rookie right? and then proceeded to win a couple more playoff games in the following years. cassel and freeman have only started 2 years on their teams...so you might want to cut them a little slack as Romo sits to pee has had YEARS to win 1 playoff game. i find it amusing that poke fans conveniently forget that the dallas hype != better than other players, and that they somehow forget records, stats, and facts when supporting their players, ---------- Post added April-21st-2011 at 08:15 AM ---------- Given the solid play of Jon Kitna this year, you really can't use the talent around Tony Romo sits to pee as an excuse. ...but but but, what are you talking about? Kitna really does get no credit for being as good as he is behind what is a simply awful o-line.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.