bubba9497 Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 The Run is being pretty much stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Run defense isn't bad - not great, but not bad. Where the hell is the aggressivness we heard about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMac Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 As of right now, i like Iffy at safety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Not enough for a first, but Bailey got beat again. Call TO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tex Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 What game you guy watching? The D holds AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Why no Time Out???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledeuce Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 You got it, Tex! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Sit on it, Spurrier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 did his job...keeps the man in front of you and no first down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Originally posted by SkinsFan56 As of right now, i like Iffy at safety I agree, especially when you consider the alternative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 I agree with the rest. The lack of pash rush is a HUGE problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 I’ll be comfortable with a couple of more touchdowns – and holding the Jets to 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Halftime. Gentlemen we have ourselves a quarterback, a running back and a gamebreaking reciever. Its good to be a redskin fan so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Not bad, but it would have been nice to get more scores. It's just one bad play from being behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Two Sacks Two penalties.... the rest = a great Half !! Go Skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OaktonSkins/BushFan Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 I'm still very concerned by the D's inability to generate anything approaching a pass rush. Not even any blitzing. Not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 they need to blitz.. they're dropping the LBs into coverage,, i think thy could do much more mayhem if they rush vinny other than that, a very good half ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecockskins Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Has SS gone conservative? I wish we would have called a time out and attemted something. The Jets cannot contain Coles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Will Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 except for that one late hit, yea Iffy has ball skills and can get even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskin28 Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 I think our all white Jerseys is making it easy for Testaverde to see the blitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boy2Der Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 why the hell didn't they take the timeout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manasseh Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 notice that all it took was a little bit of a pass rush to make vinny throw that ball early before the receivers could get open for a first down i wish we would have used the timeouts...the way this offense is moving we may could have at least squeezed out another field goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potato Sack Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 13-7 at halftime. I'm happy! However, we kick off 2nd half. I want to see blitzing...where the hell is our blitz??????/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 Even with a lack of pass rush,, if we can hold to seven points per half, we'll win a lot of football games ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskin28 Posted September 5, 2003 Share Posted September 5, 2003 I think that was a good move by Spurrier... last year he would've taken the timeout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.