Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

X-47B Released


aREDSKIN

Recommended Posts

There's gotta be a movie where the best video-game player is recruited by the Navy to fly one of these things and he double-handedly wipes out the opposing Russian/AQ/Chinese/mercenary/alien air force, right? I mean after the military acquieses to his request to change the controls they developed to mimic that of his lowly console controller.

 

All hail the everyman!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's gotta be a movie where the best video-game player is recruited by the Navy to fly one of these things and he double-handedly wipes out the opposing Russian/AQ/Chinese/mercenary/alien air force, right? I mean after the military acquieses to his request to change the controls they developed to mimic that of his lowly console controller.

 

All hail the everyman!

The Last Starfighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Heh

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/01/23/pentagon-agency-wants-drones-to-hunt-in-packs-like-wolves/?tid=trending_strip_2

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency will host the gatherings in March for its Collaborative Operations in Denied Environment (CODE) program, it said this week. The major emphasis: Figuring out a way to move free of having a pilot operate only one drone with assistance from a sensor operator and a team of intelligence analysts through satellite links.

“Just as wolves hunt in coordinated packs with minimal communication, multiple CODE-enabled unmanned aircraft would collaborate to find, track, identify and engage targets, all under the command of a single human mission supervisor,” said Jean-Charles Ledé, the program’s manager, in a statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how much money are wasting on the squids' self licking ice cream cone?

http://news.usni.org/2013/06/26/navy-docs-reveal-uclass-minimum-ranges-and-maximum-costs

The unit cost for the aircrafts, less research and development and operations and maintenance cost (known as recurring flyaway cost), “required to conduct a 600 nautical mile persistent orbit shall not exceed $150 million,” read the UCLASS KPP.

Put into perspective, a single F/A-18E/F Super Hornet has a recurring flyaway cost of $66.9 million an aircraft, according to 2012 Navy budget documents.

Unlike our congress, I always think of this kind of thing during budget debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

well we have done carrier landings and takeoffs (including touch and go) and mid-air refueling.

gone largely autonomous ....next is dogfighting

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-08/armed-drones-seen-as-dogfight-ready-in-not-too-distant-future

The X-47B’s mid-air refueling test last month showed how far autonomous aircraft have come, proving that the jet could home in on a tanker by itself for a fill-up. That capability means a combat drone could remain aloft for days instead of hours, Winship said -- a breakthrough that will change air-combat strategies and plane design.

Without a pilot, flight duration can reach 50 hours, only limited by inspections of mechanical parts such as actuators, Winship said. Those systems could be designed to go 100 hours or more between checks, allowing for even longer missions.

“You now have unlocked the potential of that airframe because it can now stay in the air measured in days, not measured in six or eight hours,” Winship said. “The power of unmanned is persistence.”

Longer flights could reduce the need for air bases in allied territory from which to fly, he said. Deploying unmanned combat jets also could be quicker than manned aircraft because there’s no need to have search-and-rescue teams in place to retrieve downed pilots, Winship said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dogfighting will be interesting.  Eliminating on-board pilot, life support, comm etc. gets rid of a ton of weight and reduces the risk associated with engagement.  As G-load limitations for fighters typically are based on human limits rather than equipment limits, could a supersonic-capable light multi role drone piloted by a good carrier-bound remote pilot hold its own in maneuvers against a manned enemy fighter, either before or after delivering payloads as a bomber?

 

During the brief era when we have substantial numbers of operational drones and others don't, drone-to-drone dogfighting is not likely to occur often... for now.  A drone that is lumbering by robot standards may be lethal to a human pilot if it can happily spin 20-G turns and/or attempt to suicidally bull-rush the other guy when necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...