Ray Brown Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 No it doesn't matter IMO. One man can't beat you and if he does you either didn't prep well or just aren't any good. westbrook has beat us and many other teams single handedly many times. he is their offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballin86 Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 yes it matters their offense is completely different with him in there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 Considering he had around 350 yards against the Skins last season, I'd say it's important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 Westbrook is a game-changer, it matters if he plays. Just look at the Chicago game. Both teams are not the same as last season, so the fact we beat them or they beat us last season is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C26 Run Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 Of course it matters. Westbrook is their primary offensive weapon, even more critical than McNabb. Westbrook poses matchup problems for our LBs. Our LBs aren't exactly hitting on all cyclinders when it comes to pass coverage. Yes, we did win in Philly but this team is ticked off after losing to a Bears team they should have beat. As we all should know last year doesn't buy you anything this year. This Philly team is just as dangerous as the Pukes. Don't underestimate Westbrook and the Beagles, we had a great win in Dallas last week but it will mean nothing if can't beat Philly in Philly. Philly is 0-1, and we are 1-1 in the division. Keep that in mind. :eaglesuck:eaglesuck:helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaGaiden Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 I believe it matters if he plays, but only if Westbrook is 100%. Just like McNabb, if he is 100%, the guy is dangerous. Since Westbrook and McNabb is kind of banged up, the Redskins should pull off a win in Lincoln Financial Field by atleast 10 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEREALTOR1 Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 I think we have bigger fish to worry about. Has anybody considered the fact that SeaStallion is still roaming around out there with his crazy/genius "macro" engineers, setting up shop all over the world, just waiting for this Sunday to introduce some new mind control technique on our beloved Redskins, just so he can make another attempt for world domination. J/K Of course it matters if Westbrook plays. He's a game changing football player. The entire team seems to play at a lesser level when he's not in the game. :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 I really don't think it matters, because I feel we could beat them at 100% and I thought that before we beat Dallas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrFan Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 I wouldn't mind not seeing him on the field because he used to perform well vs us. On the other hand it would be better to see him play, so if we beat the doggone iggles they will have no excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 This isn't last year and incase some of you fans havent had the chance to see philly play yet, the team can score like Dallas, with a better Defense that relentlessly goes after QB's. This game is no gimmy, believe that! They can beat us just as easy as we can beat them. Anything can happen in a division rival game, we better go for their throat from the get go. One thing I seen by their defense is they wont be able to cover Moss, Are, and Portis out the back field. We can kill them in the air, if they dont get to JC. Thats the key to this game. If Portis can run against them, that is the icing on the cake baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLF Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 Considering he had around 350 yards against the Skins last season, I'd say it's important. with the game winnin TD!!:doh: Dude is almost always great against us. Somethings gotta shake this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 yes, it does matter. westbrook is phillys offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoyaSkins28 Posted October 2, 2008 Share Posted October 2, 2008 simply put. yes. he is the most dynamic player in the league, even without 100% effort from him if he is on the field the eagles are better off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted October 3, 2008 Share Posted October 3, 2008 Dude, Moss is a cowboys killer. Westbrook is a redskin killer. The guys just has good games against the skins. He's like the new tiki barber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLAnalyzer Posted October 3, 2008 Author Share Posted October 3, 2008 Here is a little side note The Skins has won the last three in Philly. Realy I don't remember the 2006 Win in Philly, I just remember 2005, and 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLAnalyzer Posted October 3, 2008 Author Share Posted October 3, 2008 don't fool yourselfwestbrook is a gamechanger he's the reason we lost @home last year.l It wasn't so much Westbrook, it was the stupid decision of the entire Defensive Line to all charge mcnabb at the same time allowing WB to do his thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.