Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

pft.com: WILBON SUGGESTS TAKING OUT BRADY

twenty-eight

By twenty-eight
in The Stadium

Recommended Posts

twenty-eight

twenty-eight

Posted
Posted

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm

WILBON SUGGESTS TAKING OUT BRADY

I mentioned earlier in the day the possibility that "ome crazy-ass

defensive lineman" might decide late in the latest Patriots blowout win that he doesn't like the fact that quarterback Tom Brady is still on the field, and that said "crazy-ass defensive lineman" might opt to go Vince Wilfork on Brady's knee.

Though some readers have assumed that this means I'm actually encouraging some crazy-ass defensive lineman to take out Brady's knees, let's be clear on this. I'm merely recognizing the obvious. It would be reckless and irresponsible to argue that a player should actually target Tom's patellar tendon.

Of course, not every writer apparently feels this way.

Mike Wilbon of the Washington Post (whom we like) has openly advocated taking out Tom's kneecaps during a Monday chat session.

The question was as follows: "I can understand Bill Belichick's desire to crush every team in the NFL, but why keep your franchise QB in there to do it? One cheap shot helmet to the knee and it's goodbye Super Bowl unless [Matt] Cassell suddenly gets good."

Says Wilbon in response: "You're absolutely right. And if I was on the opposing team,

I'd hit Tom Brady with everything I had as late as I could and take the penalty and join the fight that would surely follow. Football is a violent game and there's got to be somebody out there sharpening his fan[g]s for the Patriots Golden Boy in the 4th quarter one of these weeks."

We expect to hear more and more about taking out Brady as the weeks go by -- and we think that the team with the most to gain via his absence needs to be monitored closely for low hits this weekend, especially since

Colts defensive line coach John Teerlinck has a reputation in league circles for teaching his pupils to aim for the ACL.

GO COLTS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twenty-eight

twenty-eight

Posted
  • Author
Posted

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm

WILBON SUGGESTS TAKING OUT BRADY

I mentioned earlier in the day the possibility that "ome crazy-ass

defensive lineman" might decide late in the latest Patriots blowout win that he doesn't like the fact that quarterback Tom Brady is still on the field, and that said "crazy-ass defensive lineman" might opt to go Vince Wilfork on Brady's knee.

Though some readers have assumed that this means I'm actually encouraging some crazy-ass defensive lineman to take out Brady's knees, let's be clear on this. I'm merely recognizing the obvious. It would be reckless and irresponsible to argue that a player should actually target Tom's patellar tendon.

Of course, not every writer apparently feels this way.

Mike Wilbon of the Washington Post (whom we like) has openly advocated taking out Tom's kneecaps during a Monday chat session.

The question was as follows: "I can understand Bill Belichick's desire to crush every team in the NFL, but why keep your franchise QB in there to do it? One cheap shot helmet to the knee and it's goodbye Super Bowl unless [Matt] Cassell suddenly gets good."

Says Wilbon in response: "You're absolutely right. And if I was on the opposing team,

I'd hit Tom Brady with everything I had as late as I could and take the penalty and join the fight that would surely follow. Football is a violent game and there's got to be somebody out there sharpening his fan[g]s for the Patriots Golden Boy in the 4th quarter one of these weeks."

We expect to hear more and more about taking out Brady as the weeks go by -- and we think that the team with the most to gain via his absence needs to be monitored closely for low hits this weekend, especially since

Colts defensive line coach John Teerlinck has a reputation in league circles for teaching his pupils to aim for the ACL.

GO COLTS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WVU_Redskin

WVU_Redskin

Posted
Posted

Even though doing something like that would be wrong, after yesterday and Bill Belicheks obvious contempt for anyone he plays........who knows. Funny thing is, the guy that does this is either going to be hated by everyone in the media or they're gonna say "Well thats what you get for running up the score, you piss people off"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WVU_Redskin

WVU_Redskin

Posted
Posted

Even though doing something like that would be wrong, after yesterday and Bill Belicheks obvious contempt for anyone he plays........who knows. Funny thing is, the guy that does this is either going to be hated by everyone in the media or they're gonna say "Well thats what you get for running up the score, you piss people off"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DGreenistheBest

DGreenistheBest

Posted
Posted
So if you can't beat'em...hurt'em? Even more classless than running up score.

Definitely, but its going to happen. You keep making enemies and someone is going to strike back. If they can't win their game, they'll make sure you don't win any more. If Brady wants to hang around in the 4th quarter of blowout after blowout, I would suggest upping his medical insurance and possibly remembering to buy his o line a round of drinks every week they keep him safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DGreenistheBest

DGreenistheBest

Posted
Posted
So if you can't beat'em...hurt'em? Even more classless than running up score.

Definitely, but its going to happen. You keep making enemies and someone is going to strike back. If they can't win their game, they'll make sure you don't win any more. If Brady wants to hang around in the 4th quarter of blowout after blowout, I would suggest upping his medical insurance and possibly remembering to buy his o line a round of drinks every week they keep him safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chomerics

chomerics

Posted
Posted
Definitely, but its going to happen. You keep making enemies and someone is going to strike back. If they can't win their game, they'll make sure you don't win any more. If Brady wants to hang around in the 4th quarter of blowout after blowout, I would suggest upping his medical insurance and possibly remembering to buy his o line a round of drinks every week they keep him safe.

Totally classless. . .

So what do you expect them to do, put on their skirts and take their pom-poms on the field? It's the NFL, and if you don't like the opposing team scoring on you, then it is up to you to stop them, it is that simple.

If people are hating the Pats for being that good, fine, but advocating purposely injuring the NFL MVP is totally 100% classless. Skins fans are better then that, that is something you expect from Philly or Raider fans, but not the Sikins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chomerics

chomerics

Posted
Posted
Definitely, but its going to happen. You keep making enemies and someone is going to strike back. If they can't win their game, they'll make sure you don't win any more. If Brady wants to hang around in the 4th quarter of blowout after blowout, I would suggest upping his medical insurance and possibly remembering to buy his o line a round of drinks every week they keep him safe.

Totally classless. . .

So what do you expect them to do, put on their skirts and take their pom-poms on the field? It's the NFL, and if you don't like the opposing team scoring on you, then it is up to you to stop them, it is that simple.

If people are hating the Pats for being that good, fine, but advocating purposely injuring the NFL MVP is totally 100% classless. Skins fans are better then that, that is something you expect from Philly or Raider fans, but not the Sikins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...