kelly Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Chat with Mel Kiper ~ ~ ~ Anthony (Washington,DC): do you think that Gaines Adams would fit the redskins 4-3 defense, or do you think that he's suited for a 3-4 defense? Mel Kiper: (1:20 PM ET ) I think he's a 4-3 defensive end. You put him in the four man front and he can shine. But he needs to show consistency in his intensity level. If he does, he can be a heckuva pro. He's one of those guys that should go in the top 10. Anderson is clearly the defensive end in this draft. > http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=14787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Complete Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 The way that's worded is kinda weird. Is he talking about Adams or Anderson? I take it he is talking about Adams but likes Anderson more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 The way that's worded is kinda weird. Is he talking about Adams or Anderson? I take it he is talking about Adams but likes Anderson more?Yea its weird. He say's Adam's would shine in a 4-3 then he says Anderson is cleary the defensive end in this draft??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aston Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 The way that's worded is kinda weird. Is he talking about Adams or Anderson? I take it he is talking about Adams but likes Anderson more?Agreed, very confusing.As of 2/21, he has Anderson listed higher on his Big Board, for whatever that's worth. I think Adams has proved more to me than Anderson. Adams did it for 4 years, Anderson only 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Upside is everything to Mel Chocula Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 he maybe alluding the Skins are interested in Andersen more than Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Carriker will outshine both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotalRecall Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 The question was about Adams. He answered it. But, he likes Anderson more than Adams. Adams may be a top 10, but Anderson is a top 5 or hopefully 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinzOwnU Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 There is nothing confusing about this people. He likes Adams; he likes Anderson more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siven Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Carriker will outshine both!\i believe carriker had the same bench reps at 225 as Branch, which is just sick nasty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderMustGo Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Anderson is a top 5 He is not a top 5, but I would be very happy if he is because that would mean that some other team saves us from that mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkenMaster Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I think if there is a way to trade back and get Carriker we should do it. Maybe we will be able to get Tank or a CB too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana87 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Carriker will outshine both! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotalRecall Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I think we're destined to trade down. There are a lot of good players in this year's draft and we need more picks to fill our holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilbur58z Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I've seen enough of Carriker to know he is too stiff to be a 4-3 end. I see him going to the 49ers as their 3-4 end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyConway Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Kiper likes Anderson which means we're going to draft him unless we trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jivelikenice Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Carriker is more of a run stopper than a pass rusher and is better suited to play the 3-4 than the 4-3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26fan4life Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Carriker is more of a run stopper than a pass rusher and is better suited to play the 3-4 than the 4-3 agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tastes Like Chicken Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Maybe Kiper words things that way so that he can always go back and say, "See I told ya so, I told ya that Adams/Anderson was the man for Washington!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.