mo9763 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 here they seem pretty fair overall with a few exceptions... Griffin is put as an 83, should be closer to 87, 88 Taylor is 87 should be low 90's Patten is rated higher than lloyd and randel el which is ridiculous Campbell is a 69 which is way too low for an unproven first rounder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shsu1 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Wow, they ranked Brunell 90. I'm glad he's getting the credit he deserves. However, several players starting with Sean Taylor on down need to be rated higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisc0015 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 I agree there are some flaws here but for those who play Madden, having your starting quarterback go +12 in a year is a huge bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altair4 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Collins is a 68...seems low too. Brunell +12....I guees it was the Monday night game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Cooley a 90! hell yah! But they rated Patrick Crayton higher than Lloyd and Randle El? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Are those really the Madden 07 rankings or just someones revised 06 rankings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcb4 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Are those really the Madden 07 rankings or just someones revised 06 rankings? Someone's revised 06 rankings. EDIT: I remember this happening before on this forum..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.Lloyd Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 These ratings are BS, Jeff Garcia as an 88? WTF? http://tsxdata.com/fbgratings/members/madratings.php?genpos=QB And Jamal Lewis 2 pts ahead of CP? LMFAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Thank god these aren't legit. Look at the cowboys, dude is obviously a cowboys homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.Lloyd Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 LMAO they have Rob Petitti at an 80 ahead of Dock who is a 76! I'm right, these guys know horse #$%^ about football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Thank god these aren't legit. Look at the cowboys, dude is obviously a cowboys homer. Wow no kidding. Bobby Carpenter is an 84. For comparison, he gave Matt Leinart an 80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shsu1 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Yeah, after some reading I saw these aren't the official Madden ratings. They also only provide the 2006 Madden ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 From what I remember, when the ratings are released they release all the ratings, meaning the attributes as well as the overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKiNz Jus 2 sick Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 whoever made these dont know ishh Steve McNair a 96 thats extremly funny Coles rated higher then Steve Smith Isaac Bruce rated higher then Steve Smith Derrick Mason rated over Steve Smith Amani Toomer over Anquan Bolden :rotflmao: :rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 jay cutler is 78 but jason campbell is 69 charlie frye is 78 is campbell that bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendan1386 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 larry johnson jumped 21 points to a 93. with all this hype, is he set to tear an acl in week 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slacky McSlackAss Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 larry johnson is gonna put up some monster numbers this year. i see him makin a huge push towards the MVP but fallin short to none other than CP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 derrick dockery 76? no way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
congo4269 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 The only team I saw with remotely accurate ratings was the G-men... although I think Pierce should be higher (at least above Lavar). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgjk9 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 haha yea these rankings are real bad. brunell a 90? im a huge homer and even i say closer to an 85, but i like cooley at 90 and portis at 95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tn_skin_fan_21 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 when do the real ratings come out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Tomb Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Collins is a 68...seems low too. Brunell +12....I guees it was the Monday night game! If it was, why is Roy Williams rated at a 92? :pooh: :anon: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wsniper1 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 these are NOT official Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portis&taylor Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 what a crappy prediction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Someone's revised 06 rankings.EDIT: I remember this happening before on this forum..... I wouldn't believe Mark Brunell being a 90 overall. He'll probably be 80-83, with a low injury rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.