SkinsNoles21 Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Everyone says that our number one concern is quarterback. However, although he is older, I don't see any reason for much concern. Throughout his career he has been very consistent year in and year out except for the two years when he was obviously not healthy. Although he is going to be 36 in September, I think it almost equalls itself out given that he will be playing with quite possibly the most talented team he has ever been apart of, and we all know how amazing the coaching staff is. At 36, Brunell could still be a force. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/stats?playerId=445 Ok i tried posting the stats but it just wouldn't come out right. You can just click that link to see them. His rating is in the 80s year in and year out. I am not worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Williams Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 ^^^ I COULD read that but it's too much work decoding it...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNoles21 Posted June 6, 2006 Author Share Posted June 6, 2006 i dont understand what is going on and it wont let me copy and paste his stats right I have been working on it for like 10 minutes OK i just gave the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuiceMan_74 Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 as long as jason campbell doesnt LOSE the game im happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budski Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Its Brunells fault we went 10-6 last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggoReincarnated Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Everyone says that our number one concern is quarterback. However, although he is older, I don't see any reason for much concern. Throughout his career he has been very consistent year in and year out except for the two years when he was obviously not healthy. Although he is going to be 36 in September, I think it almost equalls itself out given that he will be playing with quite possibly the most talented team he has ever been apart of, and we all know how amazing the coaching staff is. At 36, Brunell could still be a force. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/stats?playerId=445 Ok i tried posting the stats but it just wouldn't come out right. You can just click that link to see them. His rating is in the 80s year in and year out. I am not worried. What will it take to get him over 100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Brunell is a "question mark" not because he's not an effective, skilled player who can play well for us. He's a question mark because, as we saw, if his legs are at all limited, his game gets severely limited. Early on, and really through much of the season, Brunell was sharp, accurate, deadly, strong-armed. He was all you'd want. The team transformed to a running team and, to be fair, even before the Giants game where he took a shot on his knee, he started to decline. Maybe just general arm fatigue, whatever. Keeping him fresh and sharp is the key for us. Limiting his snaps in the preseason along with a bye week far better timed than last year can really help us. He's everything we need in a player, when healthy, to be plenty for us to win with. Keeping him feeling good is going to be big for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Joe Hog Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Mark Brunell will do fine as long as he's healthy. Still, I have two concerns about the QB position. 1. I'd like to see Campbell and Collins do well in preseason games to give me a comfort level that we're covered at the position. 2. I'm concerned that Brunell may accumulate enough damage to his legs during the season that his performance falls off late in the season or in the playoffs. We've seen the tremendous difference in his performance when he has his legs versus when he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronicdesi Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Like everyone else said, his legs are his key. Without strong legs under him, Brunell will never throw consistantly. We didn't really know how the legs were on him till into the season, so I think it's too early to be making predictions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappy434 Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Here's the stats...not sure if it matters to anyone. Sometimes with wierd tables and stuff its best to copy and paste the text into notepad, then copy and paste it here. As far as Brunell goes, I've got alot of confidence in him as a QB. He can throw a perfect ball a majority of the time and like most everyone else said, if his legs are fine, the team will be fine too. Passing Stats YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT 1994 GNB 2 12 27 44.4 95 3.5 0 25 0 53.8 1995 JAC 13 201 346 58.1 2168 6.3 15 45 7 82.6 1996 JAC 16 353 557 63.4 4367 7.8 19 62 20 84.0 1997 JAC 14 264 435 60.7 3281 7.5 18 75 7 91.2 1998 JAC 13 208 354 58.8 2601 7.3 20 78 9 89.9 1999 JAC 15 259 441 58.7 3060 6.9 14 62 9 82.0 2000 JAC 16 311 512 60.7 3640 7.1 20 67 14 84.0 2001 JAC 15 289 473 61.1 3309 7.0 19 44 13 84.1 2002 JAC 15 245 416 58.9 2788 6.7 17 79 7 85.7 2003 JAC 3 54 82 65.9 484 5.9 2 65 0 89.7 2004 WAS 9 118 237 49.8 1194 5.0 7 49 6 63.9 2005 WAS 16 262 454 57.7 3050 6.7 23 78 10 85.9 Career 147 2576 4334 59.4 30037 6.9 174 79 102 84.1 Rushing stats YEAR TEAM G ATT YDS AVG LNG TD FD FUM LOST 1994 GNB 2 6 7 1.2 5 1 1 1 1 1995 JAC 13 67 480 7.2 27 4 31 3 1 1996 JAC 16 80 396 5.0 33 3 25 7 0 1997 JAC 14 48 257 5.4 15 2 16 1 1 1998 JAC 13 49 192 3.9 18 0 15 3 2 1999 JAC 15 47 208 4.4 15 1 18 3 0 2000 JAC 16 48 236 4.9 16 2 12 5 1 2001 JAC 15 39 224 5.7 38 1 12 1 0 2002 JAC 15 43 207 4.8 27 0 11 0 0 2003 JAC 3 8 19 2.4 12 1 3 1 0 2004 WAS 9 19 62 3.3 21 0 2 2 1 2005 WAS 16 42 111 2.6 25 0 12 4 2 Career 147 496 2399 4.8 38 15 158 31 9 EDIT: I guess it still doesn't line up correctly....it looked good pre-submit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Mark Brunell will do fine as long as he's healthy. Still, I have two concerns about the QB position. 1. I'd like to see Campbell and Collins do well in preseason games to give me a comfort level that we're covered at the position. 2. I'm concerned that Brunell may accumulate enough damage to his legs during the season that his performance falls off late in the season or in the playoffs. We've seen the tremendous difference in his performance when he has his legs versus when he doesn't. Hell, I'd be happy with just a good performance from Campell. I can handle Collins being the master of the clipboard, dude knows the offense. I'd like to see more from JC. Though he did look good when he got to play last year. Remember, Guys like Wilbon were saying that JC was the most accurate and undercontrol QB last year during practices. Whatever that is worth. At least he doesn't seem like a dummy like Patrick. I just don't think that kid could remember the plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FightForOldDC21 Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 brunell will be the man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budski Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Actually I see Collins coming in and taking over the offense and surprising everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 My spies tell me that both Campbell and Collins have exceeded expectations in OTAs .... as I have said repeatedly on this Board: "Mark my word, Brunell will break a finger nail and end up on IR." Campbell will turn out to be this year's Big Ben. Take it to the Bank of America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.