D'Pablo Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 When June rolls around, I can't think of a single player we'll be cutting. Our depth isn't all that great... which means that if we cut someone, his position automatically becomes a position of need. Off the top of my head, I can only think of either Patten or Jacobs. Anyone else care to guess who's expendable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty71 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Maybe NEMO, unfortunately if we carry an extra WR. I hope not though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyburd Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I actually think Patten will feed off the other receivers, and have a pretty good year. I hope the other teams forget about him, cause if they do, he could really help our offense. As for Jacobs, I can't see him making the cut unless they want him for special teams. If he suvives June 1st, he would need to have a great training camp and pre-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Jacobs really, maybe Reynaldo Wynn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan09 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 but remember we have alot of camp fodder that we signed befor FA. like WR.leshaun ward, LB.jashon sykes, and RB.kerry carter. plus a whole bag of people that i cant think of right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigredskin77 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Renaldo Wynn is gone, his presence wont be missed. He didnt get a sack until week 15 against the cowboys. He wont be missed by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoyaSkins28 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Wynn WONT be cut. He is probably the best depth at DE in the league. We will keep him because we cut Demetric Evans. (Horrible desicion.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Wynn WONT be cut. He is probably the best depth at DE in the league. We will keep him because we cut Demetric Evans. (Horrible desicion.) Evans is a FA, we didn't cut him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 There's a Big difference between a free agent that wants to test the market and cutting him. - Hopefully we can re-sign Evans. Wynn is one of those universal players that I'm sure we would only cut as a last resort, which right now doesn't seem like an issue. - I can't believe how many people have the impression that Wynn is useless.:doh: I think Taylor Jacobs will be a training camp cut. - June 1st cuts are usually done for cap relief. - I can't think of anyone we have like that. Maybe NEMO, unfortunately if we carry an extra WR. I hope not though. we carried 5 WR's and 4 RB's last year, so I don't see why it would be an issue this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatmike Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 You can't cut Wynn for one reason... he's a Notre Dame Fightin' Irishman!!! :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinLifer Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Renaldo Wynn is gone, his presence wont be missed. He didnt get a sack until week 15 against the cowboys. He wont be missed by me. His presence would be missed quite a bit. It is his productivity that would be overlooked. Wynn is a good leader and lockerroom guy. I'd have to agree about the one accidental sack though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fpickering Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 You can't cut Wynn for one reason... he's a Notre Dame Fightin' Irishman!!!:notworthy The coaching staff loves Wynn. He is not getting cut unless we absolutely have no other option which I do not think will be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FedExFielder Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 You can't cut Wynn for one reason... he's a Notre Dame Fightin' Irishman!!!:notworthy Amen, brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aqq Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I might be wrong but with the new CBA i think a team can designate a max of 2 players that are their so called "june cuts" and release them now so they can hit the market early and their cap hit is spread over 2 seasons. so if this is true then this thread is meaningless and the redskins would have cut somebody by now if they needed to spread a cap hit over a 2 yr period. i think any additioanl cuts from now on will be solely because the player's playing ability and nothing to do with the salary cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalDefense Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I might be wrong but with the new CBA i think a team can designate a max of 2 players that are their so called "june cuts" and release them now so they can hit the market early and their cap hit is spread over 2 seasons. Your exactly right, teams can cut a player right now and it would still be accounted for as a June 1st cut. It helps the team as well as the player, the player can look for work while teams still have money to spend, rather than wating till June when the money is gone. Wynn is not going anywhere!!!!! 4 reasons 1. He is a very solid player, he can play outside or inside on the D-Line. 2. GW loves versatile defensive lineman 3. Gibbs loves him 4. The best reason of them all, I like him... A stat book does not tell the story on every football player:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shallyshal Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Your exactly right, teams can cut a player right now and it would still be accounted for as a June 1st cut. It helps the team as well as the player, the player can look for work while teams still have money to spend, rather than wating till June when the money is gone.Wynn is not going anywhere!!!!! 4 reasons 1. He is a very solid player, he can play outside or inside on the D-Line. 2. GW loves versatile defensive lineman 3. Gibbs loves him 4. The best reason of them all, I like him... A stat book does not tell the story on every football player:point2sky absolutely correct on all accounts.. plus, wynn was one of those guys that the front office went to and asked to restructure to help the team get under the cap. he agreed. (unlike lavar, supposedly). my point is that i do not think they would have done so if they anticipated cutting him.. i could see him going on PUP if he is not ready, but otherwise, he is on the team this coming year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shallyshal Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 You can't cut Wynn for one reason... he's a Notre Dame Fightin' Irishman!!!:notworthy how would you feel about taking fasano if he falls to us in the second round ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltimateSkins Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 How big is Wynn's contract? I remember he signed for big money a while back, something like 5 years 20 million. Did he ever restructure? Wynn is getting old and is no longer the 5 sack 80 tackle a season guy we originally signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Wynn counts 3.028 this year and 4.028 next year, per warpath #'s. i believe he was one of the players who restructured so this may have changed. It would cost us 3.057 mill to cut him this year, but only 1.528 next year. this would result in a savings of 2.5 mill. Wynn definetly won't be cut this year, but it sounds more and more likely that he will be cut next offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 When June rolls around' date=' I can't think of a single player we'll be cutting. Our depth isn't all that great... which means that if we cut someone, his position automatically becomes a position of need. Off the top of my head, I can only think of either Patten or Jacobs. Anyone else care to guess who's expendable?[/quote']I can see Taylor Jacobs being cut easily...not David Patten though. I dont want David Patten to leave anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I can see Taylor Jacobs being cut easily...not David Patten though. I dont want David Patten to leave anyway. I am of the camp that thinks Jacobs will be here next year. My reasons are 1, we save nothing by cutting him, cap wise( 110K - his replacements salary=we lose). second, he is a good ST. third is our new offense. we will be running a lot more three WR sets, so it is reasonable to think that we will have 6 WR's. i am not defending jacobs, only why i think he'll still be here. i also think he will be released NEXT offseason, to save us 600K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I am of the camp that thinks Jacobs will be here next year. My reasons are 1, we save nothing by cutting him, cap wise( 110K - his replacements salary=we lose). second, he is a good ST. third is our new offense. we will be running a lot more three WR sets, so it is reasonable to think that we will have 6 WR's. i am not defending jacobs, only why i think he'll still be here. i also think he will be released NEXT offseason, to save us 600K. Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Even if we only plan to carry 3 RBs in 2007, Nemo will be here until the last cuts. He is at least the 4th best RB on the roster and I don't think we'll find anybody better. He's the best 4 RB contributor available to TC, he would allow us to move Betts or Cartwright if an opportunity presents itself and he'd protect us if either one of those is injured. As far as WR, unless we bring in others or an opportunity presents itself, 1 WR will be cut before TC. If Wynn goes before TC, we'd need 2-3 new DEs for TC. Before someone say TC fodder, let us remember that both Bostic and Jacoby were fodder. In any case, you want the best fodder you can find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Renaldo will not be cut he will be moved to DT. Patten will also make the team. Jacobs will not make the team. Nemo will make the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Renaldo will not be cut he will be moved to DT. Patten will also make the team. Jacobs will not make the team. Nemo will make the team. Is Renaldo big enough to play defensive tackle? Agree with the rest except Jacobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.