Griff Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 http://www.blloyd.com/ much different than Santana's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimFolk Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He's a cool dude, he's been on Total Acess alot. He wants to be a rapper and design clothes and all that stuff. He catches every ball that is thrown his way. He'd be a great pickup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IM A REDSKIN FAN Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Now thats someone I'd want to come here...not Issac Bruce.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He's a cool dude, he's been on Total Acess alot. He wants to be a rapper and design clothes and all that stuff. He catches every ball that is thrown his way. He'd be a great pickup. Your talking about Brandon Loyd right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 This would be match made in heavan ... can the Skins pull it off ... probably ... the draftniks won't like because it will cost the Skins a No. 1 in 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterwagen Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 For someone that hasn't done a whole lot, he's sure got a whole lot of website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Jones Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 As long as we don't give up a first round pick or other high draft choices I like the move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Happy Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He doesn't have Moss/Patten speed, but he doesn't have Jurevicius size. I'd rather get Antonio Bryant, who is actually roughly the same age and won't cost a 1st round pick. Plus Antonio has been in the league an extra year and has proven a lot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimFolk Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Your talking about Brandon Loyd right? This is the Brandon "LLOYD" thread right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He's a cool dude, he's been on Total Acess alot. He wants to be a rapper and design clothes and all that stuff. He catches every ball that is thrown his way. He'd be a great pickup. He catches every ball that is seemingly impossbile. Then he'll drop a little slant route. He's inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rlhjr34 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Lloyd would be a great add but only if the price is right. I'm not crazy about parting with draft picks. We're giving up more depth at another position to get him. I still think there are better options in FA that don't require giving up anything but $. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 This is the Brandon "LLOYD" thread right? Someone forgot to turn on their sarcasm meter today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coloradoskin Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I have to say guys, I feel Lloyd is a WR that could put us over the top. I would not mind giving a future #1 for him. He is real young and a ball magnet. This would open up Santana much more and also Cooley. Let's go get him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 He's a cool dude, he's been on Total Acess alot. He wants to be a rapper and design clothes and all that stuff. He catches every ball that is thrown his way. He'd be a great pickup. I would hope that he would want to catch passes first off, and dedicate himself to doing just that.:logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I like B. Lloyd too. But, I decided to do some research on him. Check these stats out: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php 44% Catch! That's worse than Rod Gardner. That may have just changed my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie0720 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 This guy is Rod Gardner only to the extreme. He'll make the most ridiculous catches, then drop the easy 3rd and 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hogskin1 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I like B. Lloyd too. But, I decided to do some research on him. Check these stats out: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php44% Catch! That's worse than Rod Gardner. That may have just changed my mind. That stat is typical of stats that give you a VERY misleading picture. That 44% represents the percentage of passes INTENDED for Lloyd that he caught. Most of the passes thrown TO Lloyd are not catchable. And last year he even caught about a half dozen of those uncatchable ones with unbelievable grabs. Don't get misled because of the horrible SF QB's and a meaningless number. Now, if someone took the time to measure CATCHABLE passes thrown, and passes caught, you'd have something. Then maybe you COULD compare him with Gardner. But those guys are not even in the same LEAGUE!! If we could pull off a deal for Lloyd, he will come in here and tear it up just like Moss did. We'd clearly have the best 1-2 WR punch in the NFL. No other WR out there comes close to giving us that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 That stat is typical of stats that give you a VERY misleading picture. That 44% represents the percentage of passes INTENDED for Lloyd that he caught. Most of the passes thrown TO Lloyd are not catchable. And last year he even caught about a half dozen of those uncatchable ones with unbelievable grabs. Don't get misled because of the horrible SF QB's and a meaningless number. Now, if someone took the time to measure CATCHABLE passes thrown, and passes caught, you'd have something. Then maybe you COULD compare him with Gardner. But those guys are not even in the same LEAGUE!! If we could pull off a deal for Lloyd, he will come in here and tear it up just like Moss did. We'd clearly have the best 1-2 WR punch in the NFL. No other WR out there comes close to giving us that. Point taken. Thanks for the info. I thought it meant, Catch to Drop ratio. This is good to know though. Now I feel better about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted March 10, 2006 Author Share Posted March 10, 2006 If we are going after restricted players I would love to have Kevin Curtis, he doesn't have the size but he would be a nice compliment to Santana. He had 801 yards this year and 6 TDs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedzoneHunter Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 44% Catch! That's worse than Rod Gardner. That may have just changed my mind. The percentage is only low because of the rookie QB's that were throwing the ball were not hitting their marks. That's comparable to Santana at 63%, but he didn't just drop the other 37%, that's where Brunell couldn't make the connection. I can count Santana's drops last year on one hand. So don't be fooled by that stat. Lloyd is the real deal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drex Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I like B. Lloyd too. But, I decided to do some research on him. Check these stats out: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php44% Catch! That's worse than Rod Gardner. That may have just changed my mind. Also, in 2004 his percentage was 48% and in 2003, his percentage was 47%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avg Joe Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 At the very least he'd bring some more excitement to touchdown celebrations. He's one of my favorites in the league when it comes to that. haha I wouldn't be mad at the team getting him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drex Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 The percentage is only low because of the rookie QB's that were throwing the ball were not hitting their marks. That's comparable to Santana at 63%, but he didn't just drop the other 37%, that's where Brunell couldn't make the connection. I can count Santana's drops last year on one hand. So don't be fooled by that stat.Lloyd is the real deal! In 2004, Lloyd's percentage was 48% while catching the majority of his passes from Tim Rattay, who had a 60% completion rate. In 2003, Lloyd's percentage was 47%, while catching passes from Jeff Garcia. While rookie qb's may be to blame for 2005, that argument should not be utilized regarding Lloyd's low rates in the two previous years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterwagen Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 If we are going after restricted players I would love to have Kevin Curtis, he doesn't have the size but he would be a nice compliment to Santana. He had 801 yards this year and 6 TDs.Wasn't he a third or fourth receiver on the Rams? I don't trust a guy that small to make the jump up to 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimFolk Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Someone forgot to turn on their sarcasm meter today. Naw theres was no need for the comment that dude made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.