skinz1972 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 why not trade our 2nd round pick to kc for him,or a 3rd?:2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 There is a thread called "The Moron Thread" just so you know. Please be realistic here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loyal2Washington Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Hall is an alright NFL WR, we can do better in FA or the draft. No I'm not trading a 2nd or 3rd round pick for him. :dallasuck :gaintsuck :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hailskins26 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 or trade that pick for t.o. (cancer). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz1972 Posted January 19, 2006 Author Share Posted January 19, 2006 but he is a stud KR man though,the x-factor........and for calling ppl a moron for a suggestion isnt nice at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I'm not trying to be mean, there is really a moron thread where people make really stupid ideas. If you want a KR/WR look at Koren Robinson from the Vikings. He has expressed that he wants to be a redskin in 2006 and is going to the probowl for kick returns. Dante Hall is too valuable to the chiefs and won't trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future_Redskins_QB Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Dante isnt and #2 wr but he is a monster at KR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyf316 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Because Dante is not a great receiver, and we can't afford to trade our 2nd round (first pick) and allow 75 or more people drafted before we even get a shot. He's barely a good receiver, anyways. He does a very good job (in most people's opinion) as a KR. I think he tries to dodge and dance too much on his returns, and he needs to just turn his speed upfield and break long runs that way. He's not even the #2 guy in KC, and pretty much specializes with special teams. He'd be a pretty good addition, but not for a 2nd or 3rd round pick this year. If KC would go for a 3rd round pick next year, I'd say consider it. At the same time, he's small, maybe even smaller than Moss. I thought we were looking for a larger guy to bang some bodies around and block downfield? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doodie987 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 because hes not a good reciever and he has crappy hands...yes he is a good "returnist" but all and all hes overrated and gets lucky a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebagadonuts Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 because he'd snap like a twig playing against the nfc east 6 times a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loyal2Washington Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Remember the last time we gave up a draft pick for a stud returner? Chad Morton happened. Returning is all dictated by the blockers, Hall is the best but improve the blocking and the returns will improve, Hall is not worth a 2nd round pick. :dallasuck :gaintsuck :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doodie987 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 very true- mikeyf316 couldnt say it better my self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz1972 Posted January 19, 2006 Author Share Posted January 19, 2006 4 kr's for td's in 4 games 2 yrs ago is lucky?atleast he wouldnt wait til man is in his face to call fair-catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 There is a thread called "The Moron Thread" just so you know. Please be realistic here. Serious. Someone posted a "thought process before posting" guideline on here awhile back. I need to book mark it and use it more often on the 'moron' threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyf316 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 4 kr's for td's in 4 games 2 yrs ago is lucky?atleast he wouldnt wait til man is in his face to call fair-catch. I wouldn't call his stats lucky, but I've watched him lose a significant amount of yardage by trying to be cute returning the ball down the field. Catching the ball at the 10 and turning backwards to the 5 to try to run across field has been proven to be a failure vastly more often than it's successful. Hall tries this move far, far too often to be worth a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick this year. I've got nothing against him, but I don't think he's what we need. He's also firmly entrenched in KC, with a large portion of the fan base there really liking him. Why go somewhere and have to work a lot harder and risk more injury if he's got a good job basically returning kicks in a city that really likes him? I don't see him leaving for a #2 spot with another team. It would take a primary receiver position to tempt him away, and he's not going to be given that opportunity with the Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hail_Skinz Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Skinz1972...you've got the first name correct. However, I can see trading Ramsey to the Saints for Donte Stallworth. He would fit perfect. Moss, Stallworth, Patten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 He's, like, 5'7. He's a great, great returner but a pretty mediocre receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz1972 Posted January 19, 2006 Author Share Posted January 19, 2006 can our skinz have greatest show on grass?since rams got turf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 He's too small to compliment Santana. We need a possession reciever. We already have our speed fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prophet Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 i'm in kc... he is not wr material. Great kickoff returner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoeRedskins Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 why not trade our 2nd round pick to kc for him,or a 3rd?:2cents: Dude, Hall is not a good WR. Besides, we already have the speedster at WR, we need the big hands. Plus, you can get a good KR in the draft in like the 5-7 rounds, no need to waste our second or third on him when we need lots of help elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 This is silly, first off, KC is not parting with Dante Hall, second off he's not even a second in KC, he is third and special teams player. We already have that in Thrash, plus Thrash can hit and tackle.:logo::logo::logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neerajk4 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 while we're at it, let's trade for julius peppers and bring jerry rice out off retirement. Also we should sell the team to microsoft, then we'd have even more money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryceb07 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 He's not that good ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 but he is a stud KR man though,the x-factor........and for calling ppl a moron for a suggestion isnt nice at all. awwwww, not nice :cry: fact is Hall had a hard time physically returning kicks and playing full time WR at best, he's a part time WR, not a #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.