Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

-9-

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    500

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by -9-

  1. -9-
  2. -9-
  3. -9-
  4. -9-
  5. -9-
  6. -9-
    would’ve been a wild coincidence …lol …
  7. -9-
    he passed tuesday …
  8. -9-
  9. -9-
  10. -9-
  11. -9-
  12. -9-
  13. -9-
  14. -9-
  15. -9-
  16. -9-
    my hope for Heinicke's trajectory/ceiling:
  17. -9-
  18. -9-
    Grand slam Harrison !
  19. -9-
    no moat please.
  20. -9-
    You never know how someone could react. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/2003/02/01/deeply-hurt-mitchell-retires/a3ae2f9c-d4fe-4fde-8018-9fa8b1367dcd/
  21. -9-
    Figures you'd misspell "official" ... https://www.washingtonfootball.com/team/players-roster/
  22. -9-
    I admittedly have little very tolerance for incompetence, sloppiness and a careless lack of attention to detail in the workplace. But you do you.
  23. -9-
  24. -9-
    Not mad ... just bothered by an obvious lack of attention to detail ... a bad indicator. And the disrespect. They should’ve left the number blank ... ... like they did with the rookie class ... even though #’s were chosen almost a week ago.
  25. -9-
    Yup. It bothered me when they let Leonard Stephens wear 49. “ “ “ “ “ contemplated letting Shane Matthew wear 9. “ “ “ “ “ contemplated letting Danny Wuerffel wear 7. ” “ “ “ “ seeing Dwayne Haskins wear 7. So it certainly bothers me seeing 28 listed on the active roster. For anybody. It’s disrespectful to arguably the franchise’s greatest player. It also bothers me that a multi-billion $ organization ... struggling to win back its fan base ... can’t update a simple roster with nearly week old information.
×
×
  • Create New...