Califan007 The Constipated

Well, damn lol...it's been a long while since I've been in a strip club (and never been in one in NC) but when I did last attend the age verification was the door guy looked you over real quick and then asked for ID if you looked like you might be under 20 😂

They want to be the Speaker by proxy. Only way they vote for McCarthy is if they get to pull his strings enough to placate them. And they get to gloat to their constituents that they are the real ones with power, not those "RINOs".

Like I said, it used to be done with a credit/debit card...didn't get charged (or you got charged like one cents) but the financial institution your card is connected to already verified your info, including your age. Also, drinking, gambling, strip clubs, rent cars are all done in person. Showing your ID while you're still holding it and having one person check your D.O.B. is less risky than transmitting a copy of your drivers license online and having it in electronic form and accessible to pretty much anyone who wants it. I've had my passwords and indentity stolen several times in the past, and it wasn't from showing my ID to the bouncer at the strip club lol...

You might like this, then lol...

There absolutely must be a way of keeping children from accessing porn. Don't think this is the way to do it, though. I thought they used to do age verification with credit/debit cards?

Uh....

Good to know one of our Supreme Court justices is married to a full-blown conspiracy nut who had access to the White House...👍

Seems like it was years ago lol...

you can't really look at it that way, though. Because if so, then we needed to beat the Lions in week two to have the tiebreaker with them...and we needed to guarantee at least splitting with the Cowboys by winning in week 4...and we needed to beat the Vikings when we were up by 10 in the 4th quarter...and....and.... It really makes no sense to use the logic that if we had won that past game it would have been ok if we lost today...because the exact opposite would be true as well. We got eliminated today because we lost today. Period.

Sorry, 6 games...which is still less than what the Giants have won. And they still blew it, in embarrassing fashion, in a win-or-go-home game, which neither of the Giants games were. The playoffs started today, and they came out flat and uninspired, and Wentz **** all over the field. Again...beyond simple.

Winning today's game wouldn't have made either of those Giants games so important...and today's game was against a team who had only won 3 times. And they blew it. Beyond simple.

We needed the Lions to lose...they won 41-10. We needed the Packers to lose...they are winning 41-10.

This doesn't come across as if Ron knew...

"Some of the guys I know on the team, they would have preferred Heinicke..." Oh, damn...

Also, the "Can The Pig Throw" thread title change is just...

Rivera hasn't proven he can locate a viable QB in 3 years here so far...we don't need it to be a Snyder decision. Ron's capable of ****ing that up all on his own. It's telling that the only QB brought here under Ron's watch that's been anywhere remotely close to being effective has been Heinicke. Kyle Allen, Fitzpatrick, Gilbert, Wentz...all flopped.

If you honestly felt that way you wouldn't even be on this thread...unless your only goal was to ridicule fellow fans.

Right now, Cousins is being the Cousins that half the fan base here (and in Minny) criticizes and ridicules lol...

Why shouldn't we? And why would I laugh at anyone who still wants to know what the scenarios are?

We would need to win next week and the Packers would need to win as well. We'd be in, then...Oh, and the Seahawks would need to lose either this week or next week. Well, the Vikings have made a living this season off of winning extremely close games and overcoming big deficits in the 2nd half of games...I won't count out any team that can be down 33 points in the 2nd half and still pull out a win lol...

If the only thing you go off of are yards and completion %, I guess you could reach that conclusion. If you take your comment in bold literally, it means Heinicke's TD:INT ratio over the last 9 weeks was 0/27 lol...

But I don't expect you or I to realize it...I do expect Rivera to realize it, though. He's paid millions of dollars to realize it...which is why I started my post out the way I did. Whatever Heinicke was able to bring to the table that helped the team win, Wentz clearly does not. At all. (and I'm not gonna argue this point...because TH most certainly did bring something that helped the team win). Because I think the argument being given is that Heinicke doesn't stink as much as Wentz...not that he doesn't stink at all. We have some here claiming that how Wentz played today was exactly how Heinicke played over the last 9 games...I have no idea how anyone reaches that conclusion. Hell, I don't even think Wentz would play like he did today over the course of 9 straight games lol...