Predicto

That is called a stealth bill. Rubio: "We are just going to tweak the age at which people can buy AR-15s to make it consistent with federal law..." and also gut every other law DC ever passed on guns lol

That's a Lyndon LaRouche dude. The Trump phenomenon is really a collection of all the lunatic and hate driven movements of the past, appealing to all the ignorant and angry white folk that just want to stick it to anyone different than themselves.

I can't believe that otherwise normal members of the Tailgate are supporting this particular mindbogglingly stupid idea. Even if you support individual gun rights it is dumber than dog poop. twa, sure. But some of the rest of you? I almost feel like this is firm proof of the Overton window, and what it does to people.

They barely exist, but if they did, you could just call them Ni.. umm... Thugs like Hannity and the rest of the good right wingers do.

Dana Rohrbacher? No. Really?

ahahahahahahahaahahaahahahaaa oh my god protip: the fact that you don't personally insult people (something that you say in every other post) does not make you immune from our reactions when you say something appallingly ignorant (and repetitive).

Oh my god if this brings down Wayne LaPierre and the NRA, I will just... oh pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasegodplease

He's allergic to polonium

I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

That was Mitch's approach for 8 straight years.

No, you voted for the Zodiac Killer. Different evil character entirely. THEN you voted for Satan.

Absolutely! I mean, if Hillary isn't corrupt and evil, why does twa keep saying she is?

"It's kind of cruel" to harass a President like this, says Larry Klayman, the man who filed dozens of lawsuits against Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Given that he misrepresents the charges in the indictment (and also misrepresents everything about Christopher Steele and Hillary Clinton and Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie), yeah, I'd say so. He's spinning harder than a playground roundabout. Why do you constantly post this crap from stupid obscure blogs and Breitbart and the Federalist and whatever and then expect us to take the time to go though it and refute it point by point every single time, just so you can dance off and post another one. Forget it. You never make that effort to discuss anything anyone else posts.

Learn to vet your sources. Look at all this guys other articles. https://lawandcrime.com/author/robertn/ https://lawandcrime.com/author/robertn/page/2/ he's a hack

No it doesn't. It simply means that that is not what THIS indictment is about.

Her's a fun quick read. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/a-compendium-of-people-who-hate-ted-cruzs-guts-20160429

s0crates is the very definition of a dupe. He's a dupe's dupe.

Later? I read it on Fox News several hours ago.

ahahahahahaaahaaahahaa omygod hahahahahahaha

Assuming that the NRA's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is correct. Which basically no one with a legal background thought was the case (including the NRA) until 1977, when the NRA got taken over by extremists and started pushing it. Just ask Republican Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger. "The Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud,' on the American public," former chief justice Warren E. Burger said in a 1991 interview on PBS's "MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour." Burger has said often that the "right to bear arms" belongs to the states, and he has attacked the NRA for fostering the opposite view. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The widespread legal and judicial view is that the Second Amendment guarantees a state's right to be armed – for example, in today's National Guard. When the Supreme Court has spoken in this area – and it has done so infrequently – it has begun with the idea that the Second Amendment protects a state's right to keep arms for a militia. In a nationally watched 1983 case, the justices let the town of Morton Grove, Ill., ban handguns. Without comment or dissent, they left intact a lower court decision rejecting the contention that Americans have a constitutional right to be armed." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/supcourt/stories/courtguns051095.htm

Of course. twa already threw up that trial balloon on here.

And we all know who Bernard Kerik is, right? Worked for Guiliani, spent 4 years in prison for corruption, frequent guest on Fox News. Just a stand up guy.

Reggie Miller was well adapted to a time when the league style of play did not reward ball handling, passing or creativity, and defenses were mechanical because the rules forced them to be. Every player could always get their shot off. Reggie would not be a superstar today, because without handles, you become a one trick pony. He could potentially be as good as Klay Thompson, but he wasn't quite as good a shooter as Klay, and as someone already said, Klay's defense is much better. Larry Bird, on the other hand, would be awesome. He would be the best stretch 4 shooter in the league, and when that was combined with his passing and court vision, he would be a nightmare to defend. He also was a better defender than he generally is given credit for because he was country strong and had great hands, but his lack of foot speed would be a bit of a problem. Basically, he would be Dirk, but better.

Steph actually may be the best finisher in the game among guards. Back in 2016, he was so good around the rim that he was top 5 in the entire league, right up there with guys like Deandre and Whiteside who do nothing but catch lobs and dunk. Check out the second chart in this article. http://thesportsquotient.com/nba/2016/2/24/how-stephen-curry-dominates-the-paint The fact that Curry doesn't slam it home like Westbrook doesn mean that he doesn't get it in the hoop on drives at a super efficient pace.