paredskinsfan Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 does anyone else feel that the giants should have a * beside there name in the record books for winning the nfc east with an extra home game? P.S. I am focused on the eagles today this is just a question! skins-27 eagles-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacon Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Argh...the Saints don't even have a home. It really doesn't make much difference where it was played, but yeah: Skins-27 Eagles-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Giants would of beat the Saints at Mcdonalds or anywhere they played. We lost games we shouldnt have and thank God we learned how to finish them now. The only title I care about is World Champions!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzSkinsFan63 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 It was the Saints! I'm betting they probaboy would have won it anyway. Blame it on the hurricane if you think the Saints were going to be a playoff team if not for it. But even if it had been played ina neutral site you believe the Saints would have won? I don't. Under their dire situation this season was already decided for the Saints. Congrats to the Giants and I hope we see them again down the road! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Giants would of beat the Saints at Mcdonalds or anywhere they played. We lost games we shouldnt have and thank God we learned how to finish them now. The only title I care about is World Champions!!!! I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 does anyone else feel that the giants should have a * beside there name in the record books for winning the nfc east with an extra home game?P.S. I am focused on the eagles today this is just a question! skins-27 eagles-10 Does anyone else feel that we should have won just one more game and this wouldn't even be an issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Actually, that game was only the SECOND in the season and the Saints had just defeated the Panthers AT Carolina. It's silly to say that we know for sure the Giants would have won that game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenaa Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 How about stop beating this topic to death. Is there a footnote next to the 'Skins SB win during the strike season. Nobody robbed the 'Skins. We didn't win the division because we didn't win enough games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Does anyone else feel that we should have won just one more game and this wouldn't even be an issue? Nahhhhhhhhh....... :halo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nneece Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 The Raiders robbed us when they couldn't score from the 1 yard line on 4 plays. What a joke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockANDallstar Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 Does anyone else feel that we should have won just one more game and this wouldn't even be an issue? Yup. The GMen didn't rob us--the refs did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan080 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 They would have beat the Saints if they played on the moon. We need to let this one go. If it was a good team, I'd have a much bigger issue with it, but the Saints suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paredskinsfan Posted January 1, 2006 Author Share Posted January 1, 2006 the raiders did score the refs just screwed up yet another play. could of should of it doesnt matter if the saints would have lost at mcdonalds or where ever ,the point is that the gmen had an extra home game. What would that have done for us if we would have gotten to play say tampa at home earlier this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD Riggo Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 does anyone else feel that the giants should have a * beside there name in the record books for winning the nfc east with an extra home game?P.S. I am focused on the eagles today this is just a question! skins-27 eagles-10 I hate the G'aints with every fiber of my being, but NO. The Saints MAY have beaten them if the game were held at some neutral location, like Atlanta for example. But it wasn't likely. I think the more telling stat re: the G'aints is that two of their three road wins were the Raiders (barely) and the 9ers (barely). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santanamoss89 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 They would have beat the Saints in New Orleans, San Antoni, Lousiana and anywhere else the Saints play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD Riggo Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 the raiders did score the refs just screwed up yet another play. could of should of it doesnt matter if the saints would have lost at mcdonalds or where ever ,the point is that the gmen had an extra home game. What would that have done for us if we would have gotten to play say tampa at home earlier this season? The Raiders DID score, and it should have been a 2 point game with 2 minutes left. But as I said in another thread, the idiot zebras watch high def, high res, stop motion, super slo mo instant replay and STILL can't get it right! When it comes down to a challenge or a review, I don't ever expect them to get it right. Still, that Norval ran it up the middle four times is what doomed the Raiders on that drive. But that is what we came to expect about Norv! 8 of the G'aints 11 wins were at home. That is a very telling stat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCoach22 Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 The reason I feel there should be an asterik is they benefited from not playing Chicago or Seattle in addition to the extra home game... But we did it to ourselves, giving up 35 to TB and losing to the Raiders. We should be playing for the division today, but I don't care. We still have a chance to go in the playoffs playing the best football in the conference. I like our chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 the Giants lost to Seattle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozskin Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 What pisses me off even more than that, is the fact that we beat the Buccs. We should be playin for a division title today, not just a playoff berth. Screw all that now though.....LETS KICK THE **** OUT OF THE WEAKLES!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.b57c5f1de3d9fc31dc835b56ae1753ec.thumb.jpg.af7a281bff12a2741e8d642a78614b98.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.