MarkMayKosty Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 I know, this might just be a crazy thought.....but how about packaging the #5 spot and Ramsey to the Chargers and taking Rothlesberger?? That way, the Chargers get their QB that they are looking for, Washington gets someone that Gibbs can groom in to a future Pro Bowler, and everyone's happy. What are everyone's thoughts on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golgo-13 Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 That is quite possibly the worst idea I have ever heard. Roth would be there at the 5 spot even if we DID want him. Why would we give up Ramsey to get him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinGodfather Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Are you even a Redskin fan? Worst idea ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkMayKosty Posted April 21, 2004 Author Share Posted April 21, 2004 I said in prefacing the comment, that it was a crazy idea. A buddy of mine who is a Patriots fan brought it up to me this morning while talking smack about them getting Dillon from the Bungals. And just so it's clear....I'm not advocating this idea.....I want the Skins to take Taylor at #5. And I do not want them to trade Samuels to the Raiders for the chance to take Gallery. And I do not do not do not want them to take Winslow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potato Sack Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Washington gets someone that Gibbs can groom in to a future Pro Bowler What makes you think Ramsey can't be groomed into a future Pro Bowler? Have you seen what he's done in his first two seasons? Come on...bad idea. :slap: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 I agree.. I would be none too happy about trading Ramsey for any QB prospect this year. We don't NEED a QB, it is one position we are set. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrapeApe Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Na, now you are making excuses. We've outted you as being crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BORICUASKIN Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Bad idea! P.Ramsey is the qb of the future, that is not that distant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 This is worse than the “package Samuels, Ramsey and Gardner for #1 and draft Gallery” senario. NO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankRizzo Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 This makes about as much sense as Samuels and the #5 to trade up and get Gallery. :paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da_Truth Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Do I even have to comment on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibrahim Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Trade our #5 pick and our future Quarterback for the #1 pick...........to draft Ben Rorthlessberger :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 He's a chowder head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Hog Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Yea, that is a pretty crazy thought. You are right on there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manichispanic Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 we wouldnt care if the Chargers are happy, if you're going to draft up, especially to the #1 spot, you take the best player available, which is Manning. It wont happen since the top4 4 prospects are either QB's or recievers and we dont need either. Lets get back to the K2/Taylor threads....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJWatson3 Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Originally posted by Golgo-13 That is quite possibly the worst idea I have ever heard. Roth would be there at the 5 spot even if we DID want him. Why would we give up Ramsey to get him? i agree, a bit absurd, especially with a manning on the board! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section 130 Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 :alcoholic :cannibas: So, which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravens777 Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Originally posted by MarkMayKosty I know, this might just be a crazy thought.....but how about packaging the #5 spot and Ramsey to the Chargers and taking Rothlesberger?? That way, the Chargers get their QB that they are looking for, Washington gets someone that Gibbs can groom in to a future Pro Bowler, and everyone's happy. What are everyone's thoughts on that? As crazy as it seems I think it could happen. The Skins are fine in the QB area for a few years, so why not do it for the immediate impact. I would think the Skins could draw some major attention with Ramsey, maybe even help the Ravens with their QB issues. Yes/No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akrpsu Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 no, no, no, no. Enough talk of trading Ramsey; why should we trade a QB who has had some success and shown promise in a terrible system, when we now have him in the right system. No more grooming talent and letting them go, especially for the scenerio posted in this thread. Who even says that Ramsey will be on the bench, Brunell could get injured or beat out Brunell for the job. Either way, 2 capable quarterbacks is better than one and a rookie. :sucks: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazooka Tooth Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Originally posted by manichispanic we wouldnt care if the Chargers are happy, if you're going to draft up, especially to the #1 spot, you take the best player available, which is Manning. It wont happen since the top4 4 prospects are either QB's or recievers and we dont need either. Lets get back to the K2/Taylor threads....... I agree with everything that you just said, except for the "lets get back to the K2/Taylor threads.........:puke: :puke: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark327 Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 quote : from ravens777 as crazy as it seems ,i think it could happen trading ramsey , no way , he is the future of this football team. are you saying the crows need a qb, what seems to be the problem with your new qb- boller ? not what you expected him to be huh! :hammer: :ravensuck :gaintsuck :eaglesuck :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skin_finatic Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 LOL This is the most idiotic idea ever!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Adama Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 I really like Ramsey, but we're not even sure he's going to resign with us after his deal is up in 2006(?). So, we could get Manning, Rivers, or Roethlisberger on a long term contract and allow more time for grooming under Gibbs and Brunnell, especially since Ramsey was under Spurrier for two years and might have picked up some bad habits. Like curling up in a fetal position when the defense is in the backfield :jk:. Yes, Ramsey is a tough guy, but with the pounding he took last year, he might be a little gun-shy. I remember the two point conversion through to Coles who was wide-open on the right and he threw it 3 feet over his head, while an easy lob would have put us into overtime. I am not saying I want us to do that, I think Sean Taylor is the guy for us and we need to pick him at #5. I was just responding to people saying the original poster was crazy or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redman Posted April 21, 2004 Share Posted April 21, 2004 I'll go for that trade, but only if San Diego throws in Schottenheimer. :paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.