Elessar78 Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 14 hours ago, thegreaterbuzzette said: Out of curiosity. Does anyone actually know anyone truly upset and protesting? I feel like we are being told "the masses are outraged"....but I see no one. Just a thought. These two guys that randomly friended me on Facebook, Vasily and Oleg, they are always telling me how their friends are very pissed about the video-ski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 FWIW...Tom Brady is THE man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 32 minutes ago, Busch1724 said: FWIW...Tom Brady is THE man he does play his home games in, um, Gillette stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 apparently it means suing for equal rights. Quote San Diego-Based Men’s Group Wins U.S. Suit: Women Must Register for Draft U.S. District Judge Gray H. Miller in Houston agreed with the San Diego-based National Coalition for Men and granted its request for summary judgment in a class action suit. “The male-only registration requirement of the Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3802(a), violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” says Miller’s “final judgment.” https://timesofsandiego.com/military/2019/02/23/san-diego-based-mens-group-wins-u-s-suit-women-must-register-for-draft/ added In his 19-page judgment Friday, Miller added: “Had Congress compared male and female rates of physical eligibility, for example, and concluded that it was not administratively wise to draft women, the court may have been bound to defer to Congress’s judgment. Instead, at most, it appears that Congress obliquely relied on assumptions and overly broad stereotypes about women and their ability to fulfill combat roles.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.