LD0506 Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 I don't think this is a Redskin thing at all so much as it is a league agenda to absolutely bend over backwards to uphold the call made on the field unless they absolutely have to reverse it. There is already so much ire directed at officials that the league tries to suppress it in any way possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveakl Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 6 hours ago, LD0506 said: it is a league agenda to absolutely bend over backwards to uphold the call made on the field unless they absolutely have to reverse it. They call that beyond a reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanskins Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 On 11/21/2016 at 10:08 AM, NoCalMike said: Yeah I was much more frustrated on the ticky tack call on Breeland that extended their drive to even get them in that position. On 11/21/2016 at 10:07 AM, Probos said: Honestly, according to the semi-nebulous rule it wasn't a terrible call. The hands to the face call on Breeland to extend the drive was worse IMO. Very ticky tack. Who cares,...they won. Shelve the game and move on to Thursday at Dallas. yes...this is what I mean when I say not every penalty is weighted the same...in past years this "ticky tacky shouldn't have been called" penalty woulda turned the game and we woulda lost....I also hate the no call on the CLEARLY delay of game penalty...both coulda/woulda cost us dearly in the past ...I'm not asking for preferential treatment, I just want fairness... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.