3 Rings Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Obviously we are pre-senior bowls, combines, workouts, f/a, compensatory picks, etc. However, with what we know now, and assuming we do not trade down...would you be happy with the following draft? Rd 1 (4) - Sam Bradford QB OU Rd 2 (36) - Bruce Campbell OT MD Rd 4 (99) - Dexter Mccluster, RB Miss Rd 5 (131) - Mike Pouncey, OG Fla I am gathering some info by reading the boards here and doing my own scouting, etc for www.drafttek.com. Though I know some don't feel Bradford is the answer, some don't feel we need to draft QB at all. I'm curious what the fans would think of these first four draft picks. (my personal opinion is that, if we take Bradford we will trade down to do so) Let me know what you think. The full 5-round mock draft is at www.drafttek.com Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman#21 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I would be dancing in the streets!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIXX99 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 No Bradford but I really like that McCluster pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airs0ft3r Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 No. I would hate it. No need for a QB. We need more LTs. Maybe a backup C. Draft fat boys. Redskins had a dominate line with no QB with the Hogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RypienUmApart Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Bradford will slide into the 2nd. Campbell will probably be gone by the 36th pick. Lineman in the later rounds are for depth, not starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Rings Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 Bradford will slide into the 2nd.Campbell will probably be gone by the 36th pick. Lineman in the later rounds are for depth, not starters. This is something I am very interested in...if the Skins don't take Bradford, and the Browns take Claussen, where exactly would Bradford land? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RypienUmApart Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Here's how I feel about the QB situation. We can go without drafting one in the 1st round. JC is fine... and if JC plays great under Shanahan you just wasted a 1st round pick on a guy who'll sit on the bench year after year instead of using it on a lineman that could help right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I would still prefer that we trade down with SF ultimately and get the two number ones. The Skins lack a third and could really use some addtional picks possibly trading down again with one of the ones and getting some help here on the OL. The team needs starters on OL, not a project QB in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RypienUmApart Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 This is something I am very interested in...if the Skins don't take Bradford, and the Browns take Claussen, where exactly would Bradford land? Well I don't see anyone taking a QB after the 14th pick in the 1st round. So if a QB is still available he'll probably still be there in the 2nd round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Rings Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 I would still prefer that we trade down with SF ultimately and get the two number ones. The Skins lack a third and could really use some addtional picks possibly trading down again with one of the ones and getting some help here on the OL. The team needs starters on OL, not a project QB in the first round. I can see myself agreeing with you on the trading down aspect. (Though I can't really project it for the website) I would love to see the Skins trade down with San Fran and still get their guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uno Mas Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I guess I could live w it. Id prefer to draft o-line w the 4th pick, especially since it appears Campbell is staying. Stock up on o-line, neutralize the NFC east pass rush to give JC every chance to succeed. I like the McCluster pick though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 This is something I am very interested in...if the Skins don't take Bradford, and the Browns take Claussen, where exactly would Bradford land? I think Bradford goes top 10, whether we take him or not. The teams drafting after us are as follows... Kansas City, Seattle, Cleveland, Oakland, Buffalo, and Jacksonville. Seattle, Oakland, Buffalo, and Jacksonville could all be in the market for a QB as well as Cleveland, like you mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedsuperstar Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 No. I would hate it. No need for a QB. We need more LTs. Maybe a backup C. Draft fat boys. Redskins had a dominate line with no QB with the Hogs. No QB? I will guarantee you the Skins draft a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Rings Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 Well I don't see anyone taking a QB after the 14th pick in the 1st round. So if a QB is still available he'll probably still be there in the 2nd round. If the Rams take Suh I don't see Bradford getting by them at the top of round 2. My only point is that the Redskins wouldnt have a crack at him if they took Okung, Adams, et al in rd 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agm20689 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We could move down to get more picks we have no 3rd round picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 This is something I am very interested in...if the Skins don't take Bradford, and the Browns take Claussen, where exactly would Bradford land? Seattle or San Fran Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RypienUmApart Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Seattle or San Fran I think the 49ers stay with Alex Smith next year. I highly doubt they'll draft another 1st round QB when they have one on the roster that put out decent production in 09. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooleyKnight Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Bradford will be a bust. THe only QB I want less than him is Tebow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RypienUmApart Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Bradford will be a bust. THe only QB I want less than him is Tebow. None of them look like franchise QB's. Which is why we shouldn't draft any of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Rings Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 I think the 49ers stay with Alex Smith next year.I highly doubt they'll draft another 1st round QB when they have one on the roster that put out decent production in 09. From what I hear and read, San Fran is looking to upgrade their defensive interior and secondary, along with their o-line. I think you may be right here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Walterfootball.com has Clausen going #1 and Bradford #4 to us in their latest mock that was updated 3 days ago. And with teams like Seattle, Cleveland, Oakland, Buffalo, and Jacksonville all drafting in the top 10 I just don't see how Bradford slips out of the top 10, much less the 1st round altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Bradford will slide into the 2nd. Then there must be a heck of a lot of teams gona' be trading out the first huh? No. I would hate it. No need for a QB. We need more LTs. Maybe a backup C. Draft fat boys. Redskins had a dominate line with no QB with the Hogs. So we need to re-create the greatest offensive line in league history, through 5 picks, (because THAT's happened league wide since); and neglect the most important position on the team because there's "no need for a QB", it's ALL on the line. I've not played Madden for a long time, but if I ever do get bored and put it on, can I play you? Oh, and in answer to the OP, I'd be very happy with that scenario. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett81 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Obviously we are pre-senior bowls, combines, workouts, f/a, compensatory picks, etc. However, with what we know now, and assuming we do not trade down...would you be happy with the following draft?Rd 1 (4) - Sam Bradford QB OU Rd 2 (36) - Bruce Campbell OT MD Rd 4 (99) - Dexter Mccluster, RB Miss Rd 5 (131) - Mike Pouncey, OG Fla Let me know what you think. The full 5-round mock draft is at www.drafttek.com Hail. I would love it! Especially the Bradford, or any QB really except Snead, and the Dexter McCluster pick. Bruce Campbell is a "workout warrior", so he's very hard to guage as to how much skill he actually possesses compared to just physical strength...in Shanahan's run blocking schemes you're not expected to overpower guys but to out-maneuver them. Can Campbell do that is my big question. I LOVE Draft Tek because of the way they add the scouting into the needs of teams and give you a good idea of possible scenarios too later on once trades happen prior to the draft and during. Anything along these lines of a QB, speed RB, and OL with maybe a LB is a good draft in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotalRecall Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We're not getting Bruce Campbell. He's a mid-1st rounder. And trading down for Bradford will not work; Seattle will definitely get him 2 picks later. And McCluster is probably a mid-3rd rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpheusmeyers Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We're not getting Bruce Campbell. He's a mid-1st rounder. And trading down for Bradford will not work; Seattle will definitely get him 2 picks later. Agreed. Walterfootball.com has Campbell going to Oakland at #8 overall. And in their last mock they had him going #6. He simply is not a 2nd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.