TheTotalPackage Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 I want to see some eminem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 I would like to see both of them push ARE to 4. Zorn wants to go 4 wide a lot, right? ARE can focus on his return duties a bit more and with a lighter load should be less prone to getting nicked up. Forced to choose now, I think Thomas has the edge. A question to ponder. Why has ARE been our 2 for so many years? Obviously we like him there. And not just Zorn; Saunders and Gibbs as well. Over Thrash and everyone else, it has been automatic that he is our 2. Really not even a discussion. Oddly, Jason takes near all the blame of any passing woes, many turning a blind eye to our WR core. I know Zorn has already mentioned ARE in the slot, but until we see him there, I am trying to temper my enthusiasm. Its going to be really hard for a second year WR to wrestle that spot away from a gristly old vet like Randel El. Oh, they grabbed Brandon Lloyd in the same offseason they grabbed Randle El and had Lloyd slated to be the No. 2 ...we ALL know how that turned out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfanjoe Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 #1 Thomas #2 Kelly #3 Moss (Slot/Punt Returns) Yeah, maybe in two years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 I'd like to see us having a dominant WR corps that no matter who we play it gives teams nightmares. I want Thomas to be our Fitzgerald, Kelly to be our Boldin, and Moss to be our Steve Smith. Is that asking too much?I should add to that I want Davis to be our Gates and Cooley to be our Cooley. ARE can be our Breaston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tml6157 Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 Kelly looks like a damn good possession WR. He makes all the over the middle catches and takes a hit and gets back up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 Maybe it's asking too much but I have always hoped that ARE in the slot would equal a Welker type performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[S.S.F. | Nero] Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 #1 Moss #2 Thomas #3 ARE/Kelly #4 Kelly/ARE #5 Mitchell Thrash was released due to our burgeoning talent at WR. 2010 could be a very memorable offensive season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnb123 Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 ;6595571']Thrash was released due to our burgeoning talent at WR. 2010 could be a very memorable offensive season. Thrash was released because of injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashburn Dave Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Thomas will be WR2 and ARE will start the season in the slot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins2victory Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 This is my list, and I expect to see lots of 4 wide sets!! 1) Moss 2) Thomas 3) ARE 4) Kelly 5) Mitchel I am also hoping to see lots of 2 TE sets, the word is that Davis has really stepped uphis game, I want to see him and #47 cause some havic out there!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeannyTayTay21 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 1) Moss 2) Thomas 3) Kelly 4) El 5) ELOI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilsburypgh Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Wow! I dont think we even have a #1 WR. Moss never even should have been a #1! He was always better fit at 2nd! Bet thats why this team struggles in the passing game! Lookin at his production as of late! We really need a #1 and a #2!! He would probably produce more with him at slot or #2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.