Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

VA going to introduce new speeding program


jbooma

Recommended Posts

I am all about this, sitting on a chair drinking some beer with a radar gun and tagging people flying through my neighborhood :)

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20030529-093451-7951r.htm

A radar gun for everyone

The lengths to which police departments are going to bust drivers for minor infractions get nuttier by the day. In Fairfax County, Virginia, county supervisors are considering a scheme to provide radar guns to civilians to combat speeding. This so-called citizen radar patrol is one neighborhood-watch program we are wholeheartedly against.

If the policy is instituted, volunteers using county-distributed equipment would clock cars and send the vehicle identification of alleged speeders to the police department. According to the Northern Virginia Journal, the cops likely would issue warnings only. But there is no guarantee, and the warnings would be kept on record. In the Kansas City suburb of Shawnee, license-plate numbers collected from citizen patrols are run through a database listing other infractions. In Boca Raton, Florida, private patrols actually have given tickets and fines in some neighborhoods since 1998.

The dangers of giving traffic-control powers to non-professionals are numerous. There is no guarantee that citizen radar patrols will be trained properly or have the authority and experience to deal with predictable confrontations that will result. We wouldn't be surprised to find volunteers using their radar guns to settle scores against neighbors. There are no signs that these stings even slow down traffic, or that they are intended to do so. Eric Skrum of the National Motorists Association told us, "These programs are basically PR stunts to quiet community groups that nag the police about inadequate patrolling. They don't improve safety, and the resources spent on equipment and hours of police review are totally wasted."

Neighborhood patrols hiding behind trash cans and planter boxes to zap commuters are merely the latest in a string of stunts some police departments are employing to harass commuters. In Kissimmee, Florida, last week, Osceola County sheriffs went undercover as homeless — going so far as to sit on sidewalks in rags and fake rotten teeth — to catch motorists unawares at a stop light. These tricky lawmen handed out 171 $83 tickets.

Law-enforcement agencies should consider the harm ill-considered policies cause. The vast majority of police officers join the force to fight violent and destructive crime. Farcical tactics demean the men and women in blue. Even worse, ideas like citizen radar patrols are dangerously close to old Soviet police-state policies of turning citizens into informers on their neighbors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Kissimmee, Florida, last week, Osceola County sheriffs went undercover as homeless — going so far as to sit on sidewalks in rags and fake rotten teeth — to catch motorists unawares at a stop light. These tricky lawmen handed out 171 $83 tickets.

What a marvelous way to put spin on a story about how police are "harassing" people who run red lights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Larry

What a marvelous way to put spin on a story about how police are "harassing" people who run red lights.

They would be far more effective if they just stood there out in the open. People would see them and wouldn't run the lights in the first place. Going undercover smacks of the intention being to raise revenue, which kind of refutes the notion that this is about safety.

You could make a weak argument that being undercover plants the seed of doubt in the red light runner's mind, and thus making him more likely to stop. But the patrolled intersection should do that anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by SonnyJ

They would be far more effective if they just stood there out in the open. People would see them and wouldn't run the lights in the first place. Going undercover smacks of the intention being to raise revenue, which kind of refutes the notion that this is about safety.

You could make a weak argument that being undercover plants the seed of doubt in the red light runner's mind, and thus making him more likely to stop. But the patrolled intersection should do that anyway.

The problem though when they come flying down the road and want to run the light, then they see a cop. The drivers would slam on their brakes, maybe lose control and hit something or someone. At least when the cops are not visible they won't try to avoid anything.

Similiar to when you are driving on the highway, and you pass a trap everyone slams on thier brakes and accidents happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmmmmm...a conspiracy theroy between government and

auto makers. Not in my life time. All you need to do is ride

with me or anyone in car biz and you'll see why.

That's why buddy with alot of state troopers, plus live next to

one. Need all the help I can get.:notworthy :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...