Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Are You Excited for Socialism?


Koolblue13

What do you think of the new site?  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think of the new site?

    • Amazing
      30
    • Cool
      24
    • Could be better
      5
    • A letdown
      5

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Insults eh? Nice.

You posted two links yesterday. The second didn't work.

The first one I answered in THAT thread and then left for a wedding I was in.

YOU go find the links. I answered your questions. You are going on gut and opinion.

I was not able to located them.

I believe I asked you if you could prove that whatever presidential candidate you support is not secretly planning to nuke Canada upon taking office.

Would you happen to remember your reply to that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, that's me. I love socialism, I hate rich people, I think the government should just sieze everything they've got cause it's not fair.

In fact, I haven't been able to go to Disney World for the last year, ever since I quit my job, and I think Disney World is a right. I think the government should just take over Disney World (since I'm certain it would be a much nicer place if all of the employees were government employees), and should mandate that all unemployed people should get a free month thata, including hotel and meals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not able to located them.

I believe I asked you if you could prove that whatever presidential candidate you support is not secretly planning to nuke Canada upon taking office.

Would you happen to remember your reply to that?

http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=264389&page=4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

You asked me what part doesn't add up, I listed some.

I asked for details. I am well aware of things you can list. I have not seen any convincing supporting arguments for them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

What leads you to believe that he will do this?

The best we can do is conclude that there is a reasonable chance he will try.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Although you and I may not care for the way things have been done, it seems silly to suggest that the current admin does not look issues and policy the way you just listed.

It is possible, but I have not seen much evidence for that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Elevation of public debate? I don't know where you are going with this. You can watch almost anything now, what changes?

At this point engaging in a civil debate would already be an improvement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Does rejection of divisiveness mean a house controlled by one party? Because I seem to remember Reid saying he will stand down and vote through any Bush policy in wait for the WH to come back. That would suggest that we already have that.

Rejection of divisiveness means acknowledging that all people come to the table with best interests of their country at heart even if they disagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Openness. On one hand I agree, but you can see most public records and bills, how folks voted now, so we already have that.

Some things the Government does, we shouldn't know about.

I am talking about making it harder for individuals within government to hide actions that are inappropriate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

One of the reasons our Government needs change and openness is simply because of the shear size of it. How does increasing the Fed even more and by a lot, allow for more openness?

I think Obama will bring a common sense approach of "what does the government need to do, and what is the best way of doing it?"

__________________

So basically, you are just going on your gut and have no real anything to prove that he will actually do these things, mixed with your displeasure of the current admin.

Can you prove that whatever candidate you support is not planning to nuke Canada the day after Innaguration? __________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=266284

After patting somebody else on the back for punching people in their faces and stealing their money for not voting for McCain.

Are you talking about this?

http://extremeskins.com/showpost.php?p=5714770&postcount=95

Where, oh where, does that say I'm voting for Obama b/c I think it's good for black people?

That's right! It doesn't. Not anywhere in that entire thread.

YOU FAIL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about this?

http://extremeskins.com/showpost.php?p=5714770&postcount=95

Where, oh where, does that say I'm voting for Obama b/c I think it's good for black people?

That's right! It doesn't. Not anywhere in that entire thread.

YOU FAIL!

It's because of this.

Honestly, I don't think it really matters anyway. More than likely, Obama will be president and he knows he can't screw this up. This election is going in the history books regardless of what the outcome is. But if he does win, he knows he is gonna have to bring his "A" game. I said in another thread, it's not so much the economy, Iraq, health care, etc that he knows needs fixing.

It's the fact that he will be the first black POTUS. I think that more than anything will give him the motivation to be a great president. He knows he can't let us down b/c if he does, I think he knows it will be a long time before some voters will be able to get over racial issues again when voting in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because of this.

Honestly, I don't think it really matters anyway. More than likely, Obama will be president and he knows he can't screw this up. This election is going in the history books regardless of what the outcome is. But if he does win, he knows he is gonna have to bring his "A" game. I said in another thread, it's not so much the economy, Iraq, health care, etc that he knows needs fixing.

It's the fact that he will be the first black POTUS. I think that more than anything will give him the motivation to be a great president. He knows he can't let us down b/c if he does, I think he knows it will be a long time before some voters will be able to get over racial issues again when voting in the future.

And where does that mean ANYTHING about voting for him b/c it will be good for black people? It means that he will have added pressures going into this presidency, provided he wins. I believe you have a reading comprehension problem, as I stated in the thread you quoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And where does that mean ANYTHING about voting for him b/c it will be good for black people? It means that he will have added pressures going into this presidency, provided he wins. I believe you have a reading comprehension problem, as I stated in the thread you quoted.

Jesus are you thick. I had to spell this out to you in the other thread and show you what you said..

In reference to why you are voting for him, you said that it's not so much the issues that make you think he will do a good job, but because of the added pressure of his racial subgroup.

So please stop with the "you fail" crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus are you thick. I had to spell this out to you in the other thread and show you what you said..

In reference to why you are voting for him, you said that it's not so much the issues that make you think he will do a good job, but because of the added pressure of his racial subgroup.

So please stop with the "you fail" crap.

The added pressure that he will be the first black POTUS, NOT THE ADDED PRESSURE FROM BLACK PEOPLE.

Again, stop avoiding my question, where does this say that I am voting for him b/c it will good for black people? That was my question to you, so please stop trying to avoid it and just answer it. It should be a simple thing to do, but in this case it isn't b/c it's a bold face lie on your part. Frankly, I don't care for it when people use lies to further their own agenda and attempt to insult me at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The added pressure that he will be the first black POTUS, NOT THE ADDED PRESSURE FROM BLACK PEOPLE.

Again, stop avoiding my question, where does this say that I am voting for him b/c it will good for black people? That was my question to you, so please stop trying to avoid it and just answer it. It should be a simple thing to do, but in this case it isn't b/c it's a bold face lie on your part. Frankly, I don't care for it when people use lies to further their own agenda and attempt to insult me at the same time.

Whatever. I showed you, you can spin it however you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=264389&page=4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

You asked me what part doesn't add up, I listed some.

I asked for details. I am well aware of things you can list. I have not seen any convincing supporting arguments for them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

What leads you to believe that he will do this?

The best we can do is conclude that there is a reasonable chance he will try.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Although you and I may not care for the way things have been done, it seems silly to suggest that the current admin does not look issues and policy the way you just listed.

It is possible, but I have not seen much evidence for that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Elevation of public debate? I don't know where you are going with this. You can watch almost anything now, what changes?

At this point engaging in a civil debate would already be an improvement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Does rejection of divisiveness mean a house controlled by one party? Because I seem to remember Reid saying he will stand down and vote through any Bush policy in wait for the WH to come back. That would suggest that we already have that.

Rejection of divisiveness means acknowledging that all people come to the table with best interests of their country at heart even if they disagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

Openness. On one hand I agree, but you can see most public records and bills, how folks voted now, so we already have that.

Some things the Government does, we shouldn't know about.

I am talking about making it harder for individuals within government to hide actions that are inappropriate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolblue13 viewpost.gif

One of the reasons our Government needs change and openness is simply because of the shear size of it. How does increasing the Fed even more and by a lot, allow for more openness?

I think Obama will bring a common sense approach of "what does the government need to do, and what is the best way of doing it?"

__________________

So basically, you are just going on your gut and have no real anything to prove that he will actually do these things, mixed with your displeasure of the current admin.

Thanks for compiling all this. Can you answer my question now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for compiling all this. Can you answer my question now?
How do I know my candidate won't nuke Canada?

That was a serious question? Okay.

My guy is a borderline isolationist, he wants nothing to do with Canada.

He is also the only candidate who wants to end the war day one.

He has the most volunteer service under his belt.

He delivered babies, without HMOs and would work for almost nothing.

He gives money back every year.

I'm pretty sure "my guy" isn't going to Nuke anybody, anytime soon, except gross over spending and inflated federal government spending and size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do I know my candidate won't nuke Canada?

That was a serious question? Okay.

My guy is a borderline isolationist, he wants nothing to do with Canada.

He is also the only candidate who wants to end the war day one.

He has the most volunteer service under his belt.

He delivered babies, without HMOs and would work for almost nothing.

He gives money back every year.

I'm pretty sure "my guy" isn't going to Nuke anybody, anytime soon, except gross over spending and inflated federal government spending and size.

Hey! "Your guy" sounds like just what the DR ordered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do I know my candidate won't nuke Canada?

That was a serious question? Okay.

My guy is a borderline isolationist, he wants nothing to do with Canada.

He is also the only candidate who wants to end the war day one.

He has the most volunteer service under his belt.

He delivered babies, without HMOs and would work for almost nothing.

He gives money back every year.

I'm pretty sure "my guy" isn't going to Nuke anybody, anytime soon, except gross over spending and inflated federal government spending and size.

Are you also "pretty sure" that I cannot provide similar proof about Obama?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...