jpillian Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Just ran across the link to this story on CNN.com. Pretty interesting stuff. It'll be interesting to hear researchers' take on what could have made this footprint (if it's even legit). http://www.wsmv.com/news/17405066/detail.html Scientists Interested In Large Footprint Discovery Fossil Imprint Is 11 Inches Wide, 15 inches Long Reported By Dennis Ferrier POSTED: 6:23 pm CDT September 5, 2008 UPDATED: 9:32 pm CDT September 5, 2008 COOKEVILLE, Tenn. -- A retired Cookeville builder has discovered a mysterious set of large footprints on his property. Harold Jackson is an amateur archaeologist who enjoys collecting arrowheads and other Native American artifacts. But the most extraordinary find of his life came on his property near the Caney Fork River. For months he stepped on a rock near his house that caught his eye. Finally, he brought the unusual rock home and cleaned it up. After all of the mud was removed, a remarkable discovery was revealed. "I don't know anything about archaeology or anything. but if you look at it, it's a footprint. No animal footprint looks like that. Now, if it's a Native American, an Indian, then he was a big Indian," said Jackson. "(The print) is about 11 inches wide and about 15 inches long." Jackson said the fossilized print clearly shows the heel and all five toes. "It's got to be thousand of years old," said Jackson. About half-a-dozen scientists said they want to look at the print, including Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum, a famous Bigfoot professor at Idaho State University. Meldrum collects Bigfoot prints from all over the world. Jackson said the print has made him a believer in Bigfoot. "It was just hard for me to believe. But listen, after I found this print, there's a Bigfoot out there somewhere. I don't know what kind of Bigfoot it is, but there's a Bigfoot out there somewhere," said Jackson. Channel 4 has yet to reach Meldrum or Tennessee state archaeologist Nick Fielder to comment on the artifact. Jackson said there is another similar-sized large fossilized foot imprint on his property but has been unable to extract it from the rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Here I again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metalhead Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 So wait - he's an "amateur archaeologist"... ...yet he says "I don't know anything about archaeology or anything. but if you look at it, it's a footprint. No animal footprint looks like that. Now, if it's a Native American, an Indian, then he was a big Indian," It's convenient that he happens to find the print on his own property. And he immediately starts connecting it only to native americans, his supposed area of interest. Shenanigans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney B Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 "(The print) is about 11 inches wide and about 15 inches long." And they're sure it wasn't made by Dave Butz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 I thought Gigantopithecus fossils were confined to Asia? It would be interesting to say the least if they discovered fossils of them in North America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.