HeHateMe Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Ooh. Scary. It is almost Halloween. Bring it on Trent Edwards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Maybe if you think about it a little harder you'll figure it out. Keep trying!Btw, the Giants-Dallas game was far from over going into the 4th. Did you even watch that game? we were up by 9 at the beggining of the 4th, and up by 16, 2 minutes into the 4th It is not like we were sweating bullets here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 So much great discussion about Greg Ellis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 we were up by 9 at the beggining of the 4th, and up by 16, 2 minutes into the 4th It is not like we were sweating bullets here Hey, that was an AWESOME first half... How much do refs make to keep the pukes in tight games? Zero penalties in the first half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonetheCrow_77 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Hey, that was an AWESOME first half...How much do refs make to keep the pukes in tight games? Zero penalties in the first half. Yaaaaaa, Dallas has had many breaks from the Refs this year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 we were up by 9 at the beggining of the 4th, and up by 16, 2 minutes into the 4th It is not like we were sweating bullets here So was the game over going into the fourth or not? You gonna argue that now? Par for the course, I suppose, and what a sad little course it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 So was the game over going into the fourth or not? You gonna argue that now? Par for the course, I suppose, and what a sad little course it is. when we went up 16, 2 minutes into the 4th yes it was over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 when we went up 16, 2 minutes into the 4th yes it was over I knew you couldn't help yourself. Man, like clockwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 So much great discussion about Greg Ellis. You should try the cowboyzone. I can point the way. (I do know how you cherish remaining on topic. :laugh: ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I knew you couldn't help yourself. Man, like clockwork. You asked a question I answered, if you dont want an answer don't reply to my posts its simple. Do you disagree that a 4th quarter 16 point lead is pretty much game over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 You asked a question I answered, if you dont want an answer don't reply to my posts its simple.Do you disagree that a 4th quarter 16 point lead is pretty much game over? Was the game over GOING INTO the 4th Quarter? That's what the original comment was. Maybe try following a little closer.You seem to have a lot of problems focusing on what the main theme is without going off on a tangent. The score 2mins INTO the 4th has little relevance to a comment about the game being decided GOING INTO the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Was the game over GOING INTO the 4th Quarter? That's what the original comment was. Maybe try following a little closer.You seem to have a lot of problems focusing on what the main theme is without going off on a tangent. The score 2mins INTO the 4th has little relevance to a comment about the game being decided GOING INTO the 4th. wow man no need to get so pissy, no the game was over 2 minutes later, not going into it. that better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 wow man no need to get so pissy, no the game was over 2 minutes later, not going into it. that better? You pick the dumbest things to argue. Seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonetheCrow_77 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 You pick the dumbest things to argue. Seriously. and trying to argue symantics about when a game was over isn't a stupid argument? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 You pick the dumbest things to argue. Seriously. LOL You just can not carry on a civil conversation can you? I am not arguing anything I am being civil and you are getting all wound up. Maybe you should put me on ignore if I bug you so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 and trying to argue symantics about when a game was over isn't a stupid argument? touche :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 LOL You just can not carry on a civil conversation can you? I am not arguing anything I am being civil and you are getting all wound up. Maybe you should put me on ignore if I bug you so much. What's uncivil? The fact that I'm pointing out how dumb your posts were when following the flow of the conversation? As usual you're just to dense to get out of your own way. If you think I'm being uncivil why don't you put me on ignore? I mean if you're that sensitive to criticism then do yourself that favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 and trying to argue symantics about when a game was over isn't a stupid argument? Well, when you say the game was over going into the 4th when trying to make a point of dominating another team, and the facts just don't bear that out, then I think it becomes something more than mere semantics, it becomes a question of honsesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonetheCrow_77 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Well, when you say the game was over going into the 4th when trying to make a point of dominating another team, and the facts just don't bear that out, then I think it becomes something more than mere semantics, it becomes a question of honsesty. lol who said anything about dominating the Giants?? See how silly it is to take one portion of a post, disect it, and totally discard the overall theme of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 and trying to argue symantics about when a game was over isn't a stupid argument? While not interested in getting into their set-to, and feeling it's a bit towards the much-ado-about nothing side on both parties, I did see right away the distinction Armchair was making and it was pretty simple and clear, really. So, tell me, what is your excuse for missing it, too, yet feeling the need to join in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 lol who said anything about dominating the Giants?? See how silly it is to take one portion of a post, disect it, and totally discard the overall theme of it? When you say the game was over before the 4th quarter began, then it's implying domination, isn't it? I mean if I say the second Dallas-Washington game of 2005 was over before halftime, that would be true. You having a 9 point lead over a team that scored two TD's and a FG in the final period hardly supports any statement of it being over before the 4th began. Sucks when you can't correctly apply things to make a point. Better luck next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonetheCrow_77 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 While not interested in getting into their set-to, and feeling it's a bit towards the much-ado-about nothing side on both parties, I did see right away the distinction Armchair was making and it was pretty simple and clear, really.So, tell me, what is your excuse for missing it, too, yet feeling the need to join in? I'm sure you read the posts, so there isn't any need to further explain them... It's just an argument that would go in circles, anyway... lol want me to just give in and say the Cowboys suck?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I'm sure you read the posts, so there isn't any need to further explain them... It's just an argument that would go in circles, anyway... lol want me to just give in and say the Cowboys suck?? 1. You didn't answer my question, or even indicate you adequately attended it. And given your first phrase here, it only increases my curiosity as to if nothing required further explaining, why were you joining in their back-n-forth, even while missing the point---just to pile on ? 2.Regarding the last phrase in your "reply", it also has nothing to do with my post, and given it's wording, I have to ask you why you are talking to me like I'm stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonetheCrow_77 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 1. You didn't answer my question, or even indicate you adequately attended it. And given your first phrase here, it only increases my curiosity as to if nothing required further explaining, why were you joining in their back-n-forth, even while missing the point---just to pile on ? 2.Regarding the last phrase in your "reply", it also has nothing to do with my post, and given it's wording, I have to ask you why you are talking to me like I'm stupid? First off, I never assume anyone is stupid if I don't know them... if you took it that way, then so be it... wasn't intended that way... secondly, if you look at my post, it was meant to just point out that his comment about a post being stupid was unjust, when he made a similar post... Again, just more circle fighting between Skin and Boys fans... certainly not my intent... talking about football would be more preferable IMO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 talking about football would be more preferable IMO... Normally I have no problem with your posting, 77, and think you "do football" fine. If I judge that you (or any of your fellows) appear to be randomly engaging in piling on by jumping into an argument that you're not reasonably invested in, mainly just to give it to a 'skins fan, you may lose your posting privileges. My suggestion to you (and all rival fans): just adhere closely to what you wrote above. They're your words and if you live by them you'll never goi wrong on ES. It's definitely your best work in our exchange. I know some visitors are tired of seeing this below, but I consider it helping to minimize deportations. From the fourm rules: So please be advised that it’s likely you will encounter, from time to time, critical, disparaging and even mean-spirited statements about things related to your chosen football team. It’s what we do here. And when there is a presumption to be given, it will be given to a Redskins fan. Do enjoy your stay here---but please make the effort to avoid letting that interfere with our ability to enjoy your stay here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.