revallenjr Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I want to see Portis and Moss at %100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I voted for McNabb at 100%, but it's doubtful we'll see it. His career has been winding down over the past couple years, and I think we've already seen the best of McNabb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fmart322 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I don't care who they have at QB because I know were gonna smoke them like bad tobacco. This Redskins team is READY to LIGHT the FIRE!!! If I were the eagles, I would transfer to the NFC North, just to be safe. You can't stop Joe Gibbs, you can only hope to contain him!!! That's his eagle beating thumb he's showing you. Fear it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I wanna see how our semi-revamped D measures up to McNabb (healthy) and the Eagles offense. We always seem to struggle in Philly bigtime. Its 50/50 that the Ken Griffey Jr of the NFL...i mean Grant Hill of the NFL is injured for this game. I dont think our defense will reach its potential until somewhere near the midpoint of the season. Obviously they'll be better than last season, but I have a feeling this is gonna be a tough game. If we win it'll definately build confidence going into the season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I am a big believer of facing a team at full strength. That way there is no excuses when the Redskins kick the crap out of the Eagles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePocket17 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 You dont want to see Mcnabb..... Straight from the Coach's mouth 11/10/06! The team that Gibbs worried about was the Philadelphia Eagles. His reasoning behind choosing the Eagles as a team that concerned him was quite simple - it's because of the dynamic ability of quarterback Donovan McNabb and what he is able to do on the football field. "Donovan McNabb has just killed us," said Gibbs, who owns a career 19-10 record against the Eagles including playoffs. "Whenever he plays against us, he's probably done the best job out of any other player. It's been hard for us to defend him. A lot of the stuff is him making big plays with (Brian) Westbrook and some of the other people they have there. He's hard for us to contain. We can't get him down and he makes a lot of plays out of the pocket." McNabb has had an excellent career against the Redskins. In 12 career games against Washington, McNabb has compiled 2367 passing yards and 18 touchdowns, to go along with 471 rushing yards with three rushing scores. Because of these impressive numbers, Gibbs has reason to fear McNabb's talents against his team. http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/homeNewsDetail.jsp?id=59293 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanTaylorisPiamp Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 When we win no matter how good Mcnabb played everyone else will say "he wasn't 100%" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrock Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 There's a certain satisfaction in knowing that you've just beaten someone at their best. That's why I voted 100%. Of course I'll still take the win if McNabb isn't quite ready to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJWatson3 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 In week two i want to see a 1-0 redskins record. i don't worry much about McNabb ever since he quit running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunBunch7 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 When it comes down to wins/losses...tie breakers...at the end of the season, it won't matter if we beat a healthy McNab or Feeley...it's about this wins! I would prefer to play the Eagles as weak as they can be...to get a "W" in the division on the road would be HUUUUUGE for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Healthy McNabb. We get enough flack for our 2 "strike year" SB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant15fromNJ Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I just want to win the game at any cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 though it's said no football player is ever truly 100%, especially as the season wears on...I'd definitely want to face a healthy opponent, brings the best out of you if you have it..and no excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Skins have no chance either way. Lock the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECU-ALUM Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Doesn't matter I want to see us 2-0 at the end of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toast20622 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 There's a certain satisfaction in knowing that you've just beaten someone at their best. That's why I voted 100%.Of course I'll still take the win if McNabb isn't quite ready to go. Agree 100%, a second week win against the iggles with McNabb at 100% would be absolutly great!!! but then again, if McNabb is not up to full playing ability and we win it's great too!!! and iggles will go down hill from there!! I want a win with McNabb at 100% !!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattGeorge85 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 It's too bad I couldn't vote for two... See McNabb come in 100% See McNabb leave less than 100% And for the PC crowd I'm not wishing injury, just sack his ass a bunch and destroy his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.