jimster Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 does anybody else notice the fact that every article that has to do with Sean Taylor in the media always has that reminder at the end about him leaving the rookie symposium early, yet when writing about Ben Rothlesberger, who did the exact same thing, it's never, ever mentioned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins4eva69420 Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 i just think its funny 15g's worth of damages come on u know ST is thinking man i should have beat him worse lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Yeah a bit ridiculous. Thats the thing with the american legal system. If you fail the case the first 5 times, you can always try a coupe more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BGFollower Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 pay the 15k and be done with it. In truth taylor's high priced lawyers are going want that and possible more to just step into a courtroom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Unless you are a clueless homer Cowboys fan, this is a non-story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NattyLight Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 I hope Sean Taylor has sex that dude's mother and sends him a videotape of it when the Skins are in Miami next February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackest Eyes Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 this whole thing is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroSweets Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 "If Taylor did not spit, we must aquit"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1028046 Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 Two key facts you guys are missing in this whole thing 1. Nobody ever proved that this guy stole Taylor's ATV 2. Taylor pleaded no contest to the charges which is going to look bad in a civil trial. When the jury sees that he did not go throuogh with defending himself they will think he is guilty I mean OJ got acquitted and still lost the civil trial even though he is a murdering ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.