WeownU Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Its more than TO. Open your eyes guys. We got Vandy. We lost 3 games due to miserable, laughable kickers. We've upgraded our O-line, had a pretty good draft, AND added TO. You gonna say we don't have a legitimate chance at winning the division? That would be insane. Also, as far as those stupid polls go, they are all fan based. There are more cowboys fans than anything else, so of course they get all the votes. It means nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Its more than TO. Open your eyes guys. We got Vandy. We lost 3 games due to miserable, laughable kickers. We've upgraded our O-line, had a pretty good draft, AND added TO. You gonna say we don't have a legitimate chance at winning the division? That would be insane.Also, as far as those stupid polls go, they are all fan based. There are more cowboys fans than anything else, so of course they get all the votes. It means nothing. If everyone stays healthy - I still think the Skins have a better chance. Better overall offense, better overall defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus87 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Its more than TO. Open your eyes guys. We got Vandy. We lost 3 games due to miserable, laughable kickers. We've upgraded our O-line, had a pretty good draft, AND added TO. You gonna say we don't have a legitimate chance at winning the division? That would be insane.Also, as far as those stupid polls go, they are all fan based. There are more cowboys fans than anything else, so of course they get all the votes. It means nothing. I will agree that the Cowboys aren't as miserably pathetic as some people on this board would like to believe, and they'll certainly contend for the NFC East crown, but I still don't think on paper (which is all we can judge by at the moment) the Boys are as good as the Redskins or the Giants. They're just not. That being said, we all know how close this division feels already, so when I say so-and-so aren't "as good as" so-and-so, that may mean by only a game or two in the final standings next year. Also, TheMalcolmConnection has probably the best signature on this board, end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumrunner6900 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I guess people are still on TO's nuts. I still don't get it. A 9-7 team that instantly becomes a Super Bowl contender with the addition of TO? My question as well....TO is only one person...Maybe he should change his intials to JC!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeownU Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 If everyone stays healthy - I still think the Skins have a better chance. Better overall offense, better overall defense. If everyone stays healthy..............flip a coin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballGuy2677 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 TO goes to the Giants. Giants are NFC East champs.TO remains on the Eagles. The Eagles are NFC East champs. TO goes to the Redskins. The Redskins are NFC East champs. See the logic? :doh: TO goes to the Redskins...Joe Gibbs is a dumbass and Daniel Snyder overpaid. The Washington Redskins will collapse mid-season and become the 4th place team in the NFC East. Thats what you mean if we got TO lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGPHILLY Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 You guys are whining? Philadelphia is better all around as a team then the Super Bowl roster - outside of the receiver we used to have - and we're being picked last everywhere? WTH? Bring it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titaw Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 You guys are whining? Philadelphia is better all around as a team then the Super Bowl roster - outside of the receiver we used to have - and we're being picked last everywhere? WTH? Bring it. I believe that the reason why Philly is being picked last is because they did improve the D, but did NOTHING for the O. Philly's O is so fragile that if Westbrook or Mcnabb go down the team goes in the toilet. They also have an aging line with a set of WR's that would have a hard time being 2's and 3's. Can Philly do it? Possibly, if McNabb stays healthy and someone in the WR corps step up. Can Dallas do it? Maybe, if TO doesn't implode. Can NYG do it? They did it last year. Can Washington do it? Quite possibly seeing how they finished 1 GB of the Giants and they have GREATLY improved, especially with the addition of Saunders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LT Smash Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 that is staggering. what complete BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatmeworry Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 If i were to bother to vote it'd be for Dallas just so I can listen to more excuses like if only we had a kicker, or if only TO hadn't been broken into small pieces in the second game, etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I have to disagree with you one thing if TO came here of course they would try to find something negative to say about us getting TO. We still would not get the love they will put some negative spin on it. Abso-freakin-lutely. They would be talking about how Gibbs sold his soul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I believe that the reason why Philly is being picked last is because they did improve the D, but did NOTHING for the O. Philly's O is so fragile that if Westbrook or Mcnabb go down the team goes in the toilet. They also have an aging line with a set of WR's that would have a hard time being 2's and 3's.Can Philly do it? Possibly, if McNabb stays healthy and someone in the WR corps step up. Can Dallas do it? Maybe, if TO doesn't implode. Can NYG do it? They did it last year. Can Washington do it? Quite possibly seeing how they finished 1 GB of the Giants and they have GREATLY improved, especially with the addition of Saunders. 1 Game Behind the Giants in the regular season my friend. Superbowls are not won in the regular season. I'll take just like last year, but a SB, the giants can win the east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gclark84 Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/index Its the SportsNation poll at the bottom. With 7,305 votes, the numbers are:Dallas 42% NY 27% Washington 19% Philly 12 % GO VOTE! Fortunatley for us the game is played on the field and games are not lost and won as part of a popularity contest!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tastes Like Chicken Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 When we win the NFCE, 80% of the losers that voted for Dallass will pretend like they picked us all along. Watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.