BigRay Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Correction......Romo sits to pee>Campbell Collins>Henson I don't even know who collins is, but I'd bet he was better than Henson. I'm not saying Campbell won't be better at some point than Romo sits to pee, but Romo sits to pee's played well for us so far and he's been in the system longer. O'kay it's time to put the pipe down Romo sits to pee over Campbell:rolleyes: . Just say no to whatever you're using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 its funny how the pukes signing jason fabini made their oline good again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I'm lobbying for all mediots to pick us to finish last and reporting that we suck as well as saying they'll walk naked to RFK if we make the playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bake Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 its funny how the pukes signing jason fabini made their oline good again CPStretch Jason Fabini hasn't played a down yet. Will he make their line better? I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoeRedskins Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Romo sits to pee>Campbell :rubeyes: Really? You think so, just because he has been in the system longer he is better? That's funny, because I'm pretty sure that 31 out of 32 teams would take Campbell ahead of Romo sits to pee anyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 its funny how the pukes signing jason fabini made their oline good again Jason Fabini hasn't played a down yet. Will he make their line better? I think not. Remember they said the same things under Spurrier when the Skins brought in Dave Fiore and Randy Thomas - and that line stunk. O-lines need to develop cohesion - if Kosier and Fabini, who are average linemen at best, don't fit, watch out Bledsoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggio Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Neither Brunell or Bledsoe is getting any younger, but at least we have a good oline and quarterback who can move, not the statue that is Drew Bledsoe. Just face it fellas, unless you are a fan of the skins, you hate the redskins. There is no in between. We get the best of everything: the most money per team, the biggest stadium, the best head coach, the best d cordinator, the best o cordinator, all the free agents we want, the best website, the best message board, and soon, the best trophy in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 Neither Brunell or Bledsoe is getting any younger, but at least we have a good oline and quarterback who can move, not the statue that is Drew Bledsoe. Just face it fellas, unless you are a fan of the skins, you hate the redskins. There is no in between. We get the best of everything: the most money per team, the biggest stadium, the best head coach, the best d cordinator, the best o cordinator, all the free agents we want, the best website, the best message board, and soon, the best trophy in the league. I wish we had the best Cheerleaders. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 In all honesty - Bledsoe IS 2-3 years younger than Brunell. It will be fun to watch - the Dallas line is way too big a question mark to dub them Super Bowl Contenders Brunell 35, Bledsoe 34. Neither are too old to not be successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk Diggler Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 While Bledsoe is younger, he's clearly taken more of a beating throughout his career. I doubt that anyone has absorbed as many hits and sacks over the past 10 years than Bledsoe. Age really is just a number in the NFL. Portis is not even 25 but he's certainly taken more hits than most 26 and 27 year old RBs. It's just lazy to look at a player's age when deciding how much they have left in the tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Correction......Romo sits to pee>Campbell Collins>Henson I don't even know who collins is, but I'd bet he was better than Henson. I'm not saying Campbell won't be better at some point than Romo sits to pee, but Romo sits to pee's played well for us so far and he's been in the system longer. Correction...Campbell>Romo sits to pee Collins>Romo sits to pee My left testicle>Henson -you should see him play when he's freshly shaved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggio Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I wish we had the best Cheerleaders.:dallasuck Yea, that should be more of a priority. Imagine if we shelled out millions to assemble the perfect squad. We could get all the best, Maxim covergirls, Playboy covergirls. I bet that would at least fill up the club level for games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 Yea, that should be more of a priority. Imagine if we shelled out millions to assemble the perfect squad. We could get all the best, Maxim covergirls, Playboy covergirls. I bet that would at least fill up the club level for games. Yes and the uniforms should consist of eyepatches and dental floss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natsfan3 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 My message to my buddy at work (eagles fan I MIGHT ADD) "Cowboys fans are more dillusional then us. They would rather have Romo sits to pee then my boy Campbell" :mad: (His response) "whoops.....I just ____ myself from laughing so hard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.