mcees4life Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 remember the "CASH OVER CAP"???????? I can't celebrate too much until i hear the details of that. We may not be able to structure contracts and signing bonuses like we're accustomed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylecoursey Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 wow stop worrying be happy for one second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMU1330 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Cincy and Buffalo voted against it. So it has to be better for high revenue teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Negative Nilly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_trizzy Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 if it was that bad I don't think all the high revenue teams, including us, would have voted yes while 2 low revenue clubs (Cincy and Buffalo) voted no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Debbie Downer in da hizzle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINSQ Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 chill out will be fine we just need to start hacking players restructing and please trade ramsey for a 3 round pick thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcees4life Posted March 9, 2006 Author Share Posted March 9, 2006 naw, i'm happy and will go to sleep tonight with a smile on my face.........i just have the champaigne still sittin on ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 If Cincy and Buffalo were against it I think it may be to our advantage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 remember the "CASH OVER CAP"???????? I can't celebrate too much until i hear the details of that. We may not be able to structure contracts and signing bonuses like we're accustomed to. The vote was 30-2 I highly doubt it is going to hurt us much at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 if cash over cap hurts us,it hurts EVERYONE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Sick Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 You only get to fret until 12:01, then it's FREE AGENT TIME! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Nope it was horrible deal it only means we will have to play with 15 rookies instead of 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcees4life Posted March 9, 2006 Author Share Posted March 9, 2006 that's a deal Joe. I just wanna sign the players we need to sign without getting penalized for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 You only get to fret until 12:01, then it's FREE AGENT TIME! 1201 friday morning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDMAN7 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Danny was quoted after the deal saying, "Really its a win, win" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 It's been reported that signing bonuses can only be prorated over 5 years in 06 so if a team has 10M to play with after the last extension they could write 70M of signing bonuses and prorate them over 7 years but in 06 they can only write 50M of signing bonuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talk show host Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 remember the "CASH OVER CAP"???????? I can't celebrate too much until i hear the details of that. We may not be able to structure contracts and signing bonuses like we're accustomed to. Dan Snyder wouldnt be so happy if we would be screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconBlue Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 It's been reported that signing bonuses can only be prorated over 5 years in 06 so if a team has 10M to play with after the last extension they could write 70M of signing bonuses and prorate them over 7 years but in 06 they can only write 50M of signing bonuses. Need a shovel? Looks like you are diggin deep for bad stuff for us. Do me a favor, just enoy the benifits of a CBA extension for your own team for a minute rather than your life long hobby of foisting your own SPECIAL for of doom and gloom OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extreme Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 You need to remember, Dan Snyder is a young super millionaire for a reason - he's a genius. He never would've voted in favor of anything that would be screwing the Redskins. Trust me, him voting yes means this benefits us a lot more than it hurts us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pocono Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Need a shovel? Looks like you are diggin deep for bad stuff for us. Do me a favor, just enoy the benifits of a CBA extension for your own team for a minute rather than your life long hobby of foisting your own SPECIAL for of doom and gloom OK? "If the cap is 102M I think you have to figure 2 or 3M for increased minimums and tender offers. One plus for the Skins is they have about 5M of incentives in contracts that are there to meet the 30% rule which are canceled upon an extension so that's about 5M of extra space." My post on another thread lets you know there is 5M of extra space coming that no one here seems to know about. I thought it was important that those that care know about it. This thread is about negative aspects of the agreement and this change in proration is a negative because the Skins like to pay the maximum bonus allowed by the CBA within a contract structure and spread it out as far as possible. As for enjoying the benefits the Eagles also have about 7M of fake incentives so this extension puts them about 34M under without doing any restructures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.