Dccat Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Obviously Jacobs doesn't seem to be the answer, I think we should have kept McCants. I know he wasn't playing special teams , But I see he is in Philly. I just think he could have been the big widout we needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 He's doing marvelous things in Philly. Okay. Maybe not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinstzar Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 We cut Darnerian is not an NFL reciever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donita35 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Definitely. I have been saying that since they let him go. Let's just hope that Gibbs made the right decision by releasing the biggest WR that we had on the roster. Or perhaps Jacobs will come around this game and make some plays then all will be forgiven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donita35 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 He's doing marvelous things in Philly.Okay. Maybe not. Give him some time. I think he can become a good third receiver for them. It is not like they have Peyton Manning throwing the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kappaluvacee Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 He's regarded as one of Philly's better Special teams players. I told people on this board that DMAC played Special Teams in college. In Philly he is a Gunner. He was on Philly CSN's Angelo Cataldi Show 1 week ago and he talked about playing special teams and how he was never opposed to doing so in his career. DMAC would have been my choice over Jacobs. I said that back when he got cut and I'll say it now. As a WR, DMAC hasn't proven that he should be on a team’s roster as such. I like his him, but I'm partial. DMAC can't crack the starting lineup on a team that has dreadful WR's so he must not impress Andy Reid either with his WR skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RYANJOHNXI Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 you guys forgot that DAR-CARRIEN... was a budding singer...ready to hit his prime...we may have needed and new sultry version of hail to the redskins....but now our go to guys is gone....great job front office! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Taylor is better in practice, McCants is better in games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alldaz Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Taylor is better in practice, McCants is better in games. stated very well :notworthy I agree 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Who versus who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonefishing Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 i liked McCants, he made a few bonehead mistakes sure, but he had good hands. Sonny was always screaming for 'skin qb's to pass to him! when h.o.f. qb's scream throw him to get more touches, i listen. Jacobs is fast and.... perhaps he will blow up soon.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 I still go with The Coach opinion. He has proved to me that he knows thing or two about wide receivers. And size isn't always matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Taylor is better in practice, McCants is better in games. combine the two of them and they would be...below average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atown Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 i think jacobs is good but he gets nervous as hell i see him in the interview and its like hes about to pass out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloppyOneXXVI Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 combine the two of them and they would be...below average. Honestly, between the two of these guys neither is better than a bad #3 or an average #4. Neither of them were/are the answer, we need to address our WR problems in free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ignatius J. Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Who versus who? exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.