Thiebear Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Currently talking about the NFC East as the be all end all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanCollins Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 who's talking? We have been posting good numbers, in most of our games, even though a lot of the drives didn't produce scores. Even when we lost, we out played the other team. And we have a tought schedule = We are the baddest! :point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chomerics Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Currently talking about the NFC East as the be all end all. Don't think so, just quite yet. The AFC West is pretty tough this year, as we know, seeing how both the losses came from that division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty P For The Pulitzer Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I'm not impressed with the AFC West. Denver is solid, KC is inconsistant, San Diego is very overrated, and Oaktown sucks. We lost because Denver and KC are very tough to play in, and they were both very close losses. SD is 1-2 now against the NFC Beast. KC is 1-1. Oaktown is 1-1. Denver is 1-1. So the NFC East has the edge in overall record and head-to-head. IMO, the NFC South has a slight edge over the AFC West as the 2nd best division. And by the way, quite frankly, this show is pretty bad. "Remember, this is my house, but you're welcome anytime." :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I'm not impressed with the AFC West. Denver is solid, KC is inconsistant, San Diego is very overrated, and Oaktown sucks. We lost because Denver and KC are very tough to play in, and they were both very close losses. SD is 1-2 now against the NFC Beast. KC is 1-1. Oaktown is 1-1. Denver is 1-1. So the NFC East has the edge in overall record and head-to-head. IMO, the NFC South has a slight edge over the AFC West as the 2nd best division.And by the way, quite frankly, this show is pretty bad. "Remember, this is my house, but you're welcome anytime." :doh: San Diego is not overated, the schedule they have had is brutal. They have played a playoff team every week, played I think 3 teams after their byes, and have been going west to east coast all year. They are for real just been so screwed by the schedule. They have also lost 4 games I think by 12 points? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty P For The Pulitzer Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 San Diego is not overated, the schedule they have had is brutal. They have played a playoff team every week, played I think 3 teams after their byes, and have been going west to east coast all year. They are for real just been so screwed by the schedule. They have also lost 4 games I think by 12 points? If they were for real, they wouldn't need people to make excuses for them being 3-4. They don't have the D to be a great team. How good a team is is determined by their results on the field, not their stats or what the media says, or any of that other stuff. And if they can't beat playoff teams, how can they be for real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I thought this was going to be a Marty Shottenheimer thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.