nonniey

Then don't pretend to be confused when you are smart enough to follow what I am saying. And I know you are.

@visionary what part are you confused about? I'll explain further.

Ebola is far worse than Covid19 using your reasoning. At this point COVID 19 is worse than the flu due to the over all impact it has had. However, even today the flu has caused more sickness and deaths this season so far (that could very well change, heck is likely to change). I stand by the statement I made in January no alternative facts needed.

Those were not experimental drugs - it was an experimental treatment. Doctors are allowed to use any approved drugs in treatments unless they specifically have been banned from doing so. Normally they are very hesitant to do this due to the Tort situation in this country. If these malaria drugs do end up working we can thank the Koreans as it would have been highly unlikely that US doctors would have ever have taken the initial risk. (Another reason for Tort reform).

The Connecticut Governor claimed that a 7 week old infant had died of the Coronavirus. A postmortem autopsy showed that she had the virus. However the coroner officially has stated the cause of death is being investigated. There have been reports that the baby died in an accident (I heard drowning - but from an iffy source). From reactions that are happening the accidental death is probably true (maybe not drowning) and now there seems to be a reaction on the opposite extreme.

That is a stupid over reaction to what Connecticut did with their infant corona death.

rgr.

Ok to clear this up once and for all - you need to use the data from 27 January to properly refute me.

PCS basically called me off, while also trying to give a hint to those two on what they (and you maybe) are missing. I'll leave it at that.

Again - Reading comprehension seems to be a serious problem for some on this board.

@spjunkies - Reading comprehension, it's a thing.

If there is no season, I believe so. However if there is no college football season then each teams scouting departments are going to have a major challenge accurately assessing prospects. I imagine the number of 1st and 2d round busts will spike for that class, while lower rounds and FAs will have more diamonds in them than usual.

Who did the Giants take????

Beat this -Not the scores - but the actual players picked. Your score is: 39836 (GRADE: A-)Your Picks:Round 1 Pick 3 (DET): Chase Young, DE/OLB, Ohio St. (A)Round 1 Pick 18 (MIA): Jerry Jeudy, WR, Alabama (A)Round 3 Pick 33 (CLE): Brycen Hopkins, TE, Purdue (A+)Round 3 Pick 34 (N.E.): Ben Bartch, OT, St. John's (MN) (A+)Round 3 Pick 42 (BALT): Julian Blackmon, FS/SS, Utah (A+)Round 4 Pick 4 (NYG): Michael Ojemudia, CB, Iowa (A+)Round 4 Pick 16 (IND): Ben Bredeson, OG, Michigan (A+)Round 6 Pick 4 (NYG): Joshua Kelley, RB, UCLA (A+)Round 7 Pick 15: Justin Strnad, OLB, Wake Forest (A+)Your Future Picks:2021 Round 1 Pick2022 Round 1 Pick

I posted some great parenting advise in today's Stadium's "Redskins trade out of 2d pick thread" probably would have been more appropriate here. Being April fools thought it would a good to gin up a message from the Governor saying this years school would not count so it would be repeated for all grades come August. Daughter had a fit.

Turning???? I think that boat sailed a couple of years back.

Not my study I just said I hope they were right. Pure conjecture on first question but here goes - maybe they are spiking now because we are just now identifying/reacting to COVID19 and previous pneumonia hospitalizations weren't ID'd as COVID19 (Basically it was lost in the seasonal flu hospitalizations which have been worse than normal this year)???? As for the 2d question that is a bit easier they need to check for anti-bodies not COVID19 additionally they aren't checking most people who are not sick. BTW even if this Oxford study is wrong, checking for anti-bodies would be a good idea anyway as it would free up those people to return to work. Yep maybe.

Well here is something interesting. It would be great news if this turns out to be correct. Financial Times: https://www.ft.com/content/5ff6469a-6dd8-11ea-89df-41bea055720b?segmentId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9 The new coronavirus may already have infected far more people in the UK than scientists had previously estimated — perhaps as much as half the population — according to modelling by researchers at the University of Oxford. If the results are confirmed, they imply that fewer than one in a thousand of those infected with Covid-19 become ill enough to need hospital treatment, said Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology, who led the study. The vast majority develop very mild symptoms or none at all. “We need immediately to begin large-scale serological surveys — antibody testing — to assess what stage of the epidemic we are in now,” she said. The modelling by Oxford’s Evolutionary Ecology of Infectious Disease group indicates that Covid-19 reached the UK by mid-January at the latest. Like many emerging infections, it spread invisibly for more than a month before the first transmissions within the UK were officially recorded at the end of February..........

He traded 3.2 for a lower 3rd and then likely retraded acquired picks.

I thought he he said all elective procedures were suspended (Medical supply related)? Should he have said all elective procedures except abortions were suspended? Look at how that would have been viewed if done that way in New York.

Unfortunately she did (poured would be a better verb though). But in her defense I imagine it would be only that very rare politician that wouldn't try to take advantage of a situation like this. Even Bush (W) (who I like) did with 9-11 and Obama did with the great recession.

The US has more ICU beds per capita so are better positioned to provide critical care for those needing it.

Perfection is the enemy of good enough.

That line of thinking has already been expressed in the US.

How the hell are they going to be able to use Georgiou in a section 31 spinoff given where she ended up in Discovery (Is Dr Who going to intervene?).