Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

skinsfan66

Members
  • Posts

    1,228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About skinsfan66

  • Birthday 03/18/1958

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Birthdate
    march 18
  • Washington Football Team Fan Since
    1970
  • Favorite Washington Football Team Player
    Larry Brown- Joe Jacoby
  • Not a Washington Football Team Fan? Tell us YOUR team:
    Redskins
  • Location
    Frederick county Md.
  • Zip Code
    21755
  • Interests
    fishing skins terps horseracing
  • Occupation
    mech inspector

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. So would you rather have Fields or Russell as your starter, that seemed to be the point and who was the best fit. I would take Fields to if I did not have a QB, would rather had Howell who lite up some better teams than Washington.
  2. They will find a way to use his running style to mix it up, if Wilson has nothing left then it is Fields. Fields had 4 years in Chicago they were just spinning wheels with him, my opinion not bashing.
  3. (Rings) look at the QB's if they are not elite Passers there will be no rings. Elite runners can only get you so far, the passer trumps the runner in this NFL. Wilson, Mahomes, are mobile QB's that buy time and they have rings because they can pass the ball. The pocket passers still get it done too, mobile might be better these days too. But runners have an empty trophy case at this point.
  4. Bears draft, Caleb W. same type QB as Russell and ditched the nonpassing, running QB Fields. When Fields can pass the ball in the NFL he will make it, J. Daniels has a chance because he can Pass the ball, like Russell has done from the get go. Russell has a ring too. They will have some running plays in Pittsburg for Fields like NO does for 2 QB's. Big Ben has rings too, that's what they want, if they only could clone him? The locker room will side with Russell if he has anything left, especially the WR's. That's my opinion on this matter.
  5. For me it's Bates, he has been here to long and done next to nothing, average blocker that's it, I need to see what A.Rogers if healthy has, turner gets a shot too but Ertz has his spot taken care of as right now.
  6. Bad get's your QB killed and it was worst inside so maybe they fixed some of that. No's are just no's and do not tell the real story, sometimes you have to believe your eyes.
  7. We have had what 7/8 starting day 1 QB's and most played their last games here and not make it through the season. The OL has been terrible during these times. They have not been okay. OL rebuild should have started last year when we were in position to take them, instead we got DB's. Ravens, Steelers just rebuild the lines year after year through the draft mainly. I guess we will see this year and do not blame the new staff for taking who they took instead of OL. Maybe their 2 FA signings and 3rd rd. draft pick will improve the line from last year?
  8. I wanted the team to draft 3 QB's before Daniels, 2 with a trade down. Reason being body and age and running style for fear of injuries. That's it never posted or commented on stats numbers, metrics, mother, Arm......I Commented on the hits he received and his style running and player comparable. I commented for the opposition quite a bit for what I wanted and who I like, with that said they picked J.D. and I believe in the front office and loved this draft top to bottom. To me he is Field's running, but a much better passer. His body is more a W.R. type while Jamar has a running back type build, he can take and give hits, straight arms what ever. Never had any hate for him and said in the end I would be on board if they pick him. Also think these coaches will be wise to keep him as safe as possible while using all his skills. Hail to the Commanders we have a new QB!
  9. You did call DL before the senior bowl 3/4 type end, I was right there too even suggested FL. St. Fiske after watching S.B. practice. My only post before the 2nd. rd. started I said we should take a hard look at DL because of value, also suggested the trade down on our pick 40. I like the pick of course but thought it might be Jenkins or Fiske in a trade down. Thought we might take Ladd first (SIP pick for 36). But he went 2 picks before ours liked him also from the senior bowl.
  10. I agree nice draft, OT early could not happen without a trade, so they took DL where the value was. Did not get Ladd, Roman, he is that type and our pick from the Bears late 3rd, so would not have been their rd.5.
  11. Now you have another man in the middle who can rotate and not lose a beat while keeping all fresh or 3/4 at times. Very happy with the pick, the run on OL in the first made it possible for him to drop. The value was DL early 2nd. I posted we should take a hard look in my other post.
  12. I do not see why the Raiders would want to trade their physical TE, just because they drafted a 235lb TE who runs like a WR. They should use them both. They did not get a QB yesterday, Minshew is going to need the help and they will most likely run the ball more.
  13. I am with you on Ladd if he is there at 36 he is the best value. I like Wilson with are 1st. 3rd rd. pick if he is still on the board, they just fit what we need. I think we go OL, DE with 40 or trade down and have lots of choices from 40 till the end of 4th rd. TE, LB.... there is still a couple DL players that I would give a hard look in this range. Take my shots at DB's after the 4th. No need to reach for a player even though OT is the top need at this point, the ship might have sailed on the top ones?
  14. Time for me to get on board and hope for the best for our QB and team. Plus I believe in the new front office. Let's Go Commanders!
×
×
  • Create New...