Eagles_Legendz Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 wow top 20 of 32, thats outstanding You missed the point. :doh: I was pointing out how bad the other defenses in the NFC were, you just furthered to accentuate that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by Eagles_Legendz You missed the point. :doh: I was pointing out how bad the other defenses in the NFC were, you just furthered to accentuate that. I've been discussing this one for weeks. There isn't one team left in the NFC that has a passing defense in the top 20. Atlanta is 28th. You see, the Iggles will have their way in the passing game through LJ, Lewis and Westbrook. Now if they make the SB terrel will play the question will be at what level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by Eagles_Legendz You missed the point. :doh: I was pointing out how bad the other defenses in the NFC were, you just furthered to accentuate that. I think the Falcons have a real shot, that will be a tough game. In anycase, youll face a real team in the superbowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 I think the Falcons have a real shot, that will be a tough game. In anycase, youll face a real team in the superbowl You mean their will be a legit team to represent the AFC in the SB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic You mean their will be a legit team to represent the AFC in the SB? Yes, like Pitt or NE. It wont be close, if you get that far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 Yes, like Pitt or NE. It wont be close, if you get that far Otay, it won't be close. Anymore pearls of wisdom you would like to share? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic Otay, it won't be close. Anymore pearls of wisdom you would like to share? Here's one, it's spelled "O-K-A-Y". You're the Bills of the '90's, great work. Now McNabb can go home to Easter Island to complete the landscape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 Here's one, it's spelled "O-K-A-Y". You're the Bills of the '90's, great work. Now McNabb can go home to Easter Island to complete the landscape. I guess you don't remember the SNL skit, too young I suppose. About this window theory. Unfortunate for you, the Eagles are poised to continue this success for at least three more seasons. 18 million under next year, 22 and 28 the following. 11 picks in the draft this upcoming April, five in the first three rounds. More starters signed long term than any other club. Continue to be bitter because you have no choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Eagles, But I said that the Packers would win today as well. Hope my prediction works out like it did this weekend;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic I guess you don't remember the SNL skit, too young I suppose. About this window theory. Unfortunate for you, the Eagles are poised to continue this success for at least three more seasons. 18 million under next year, 22 and 28 the following. 11 picks in the draft this upcoming April, five in the first three rounds. More starters signed long term than any other club. Continue to be bitter because you have no choice. I guess I am too young Buckwheat We'll see, you've been decent, just have not been able to get it done, maybe its the coach. How long before T.O. is an issue? The more stars you bring in the more attention that baby will require. Good Luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 I guess I am too young Buckwheat We'll see, you've been decent, just have not been able to get it done, maybe its the coach. How long before T.O. is an issue? The more stars you bring in the more attention that baby will require. Good Luck As TO would say.."I'd love me some me"! Best thing to happen to the Iggles franchise in the last five years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic As TO would say.."I'd love me some me"! Best thing to happen to the Iggles franchise in the last five years. yea that ignorant jackass would say something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 yea that ignorant jackass would say something like that It could be worse. One could proclaim his innocence while intoxicated on the road at 3 AM. But who's really paying attention? Pom Pom's and sharpies, as well as a slick tounge, is now punishable in a court of law and could diminish your staure as one of the leagues top receivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdsknbill Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by Westbrook36 I guess the question that comes up is whether or not Reid will play his starters next week or save them for the NFCC Game. Well why not? Nothing the Beagles do would surprise me. Is TO still "resting" too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic It could be worse. One could profess his innocence while intoxicated on the road at 3 AM. But who's really paying attention? How do you know he was drunk? Did he take a breathalizer? was there evidence? Obviously not or it would not have been thrownout. This is America thank God, where you're innocent until proven guilty and you are allowed to spout your BS all you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdsknbill Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic It could be worse. One could profess his innocence while intoxicated on the road at 3 AM. But who's really paying attention? It's called an acquittal :jerk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by rdsknbill It's called an acquittal :jerk: And if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. :stupid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagles_Legendz Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 Here's one, it's spelled "O-K-A-Y". You're the Bills of the '90's, great work. Now McNabb can go home to Easter Island to complete the landscape. Better to be the Bills of the 90s than the Bengals of the 90s. Just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconBlue Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 I gotta a say I'm thinkin the Vikes might pull this one out.I don't actually see them as better but I just kinda smell a little blood in the water. I just sense philly going out early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzlightbeer81 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by Eagles_Legendz Better to be the Bills of the 90s than the Bengals of the 90s. Just sayin'. Ill take your silence on the matter as agreement that McNabb does indeed have the biggest uglyiest head on Earth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdsknbill Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by phanatic And if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. :stupid: OK OJ. :doh: You're baffling me with your brilliance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeaconBlue Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by Eagles_Legendz Better to be the Bills of the 90s than the Bengals of the 90s. Just sayin'. There's some wisdom in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagles_Legendz Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by buzzlightbeer81 Ill take your silence on the matter as agreement that McNabb does indeed have the biggest uglyiest head on Earth I believe that honor goes to a one Tyrone Hill, former 76ers player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanatic Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Originally posted by rdsknbill OK OJ. :doh: You're baffling me with your brilliance He failed his sobriety test. he was drunk. He IS the Redskins best player on D. He WILL NOT be lambasted by the law or the media. That's my point and that's how the law works. If it makes you feel any better to believe he wasn'r drinking and driving, fine. It still doesn't change the character of the player. You know this to be fact. I think Taylor is one hell of a talent and probably will end up being the Skins franchise player. let's not treat the guy with kid gloves. He's already proven on and off the field he's a loose canon. he'll clean up his act. just don't baby the punk if you're gonna sling the cow patties at others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TenaciousB15 Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Favre had every chance to keep that game close, but he kept throwing interceptions. Without such a redicolous +/- turnover ratio, don't expect to see the Vikings do that again. Obviously Favres interception numbers are much different then McNabbs. This year, and on a yearly average. The Eagles are much more prepared to handle Culpeppers mobility as well. They showed that in week 2 by moving Kearse all over the field to account for it. This game will be won on defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.