KirkNC Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Time to kill? This is an exercize to figure out what the reception dispursment will be among Redskins this year. Assumption: Redskins QB's will throw 320 completions for 3,920 yards and 27 touchdowns. So my thought on the break-down of those 320 receptions. Coles 58 890 5 (yes I think he will miss games) Thrash 52 740 6 Gardner 40 500 4 Portis 38 400 1 HB/TE's 38 350 2 Taylor 36 500 3 Other Backs 30 240 2 McCants 28 300 4 How do you see it panning out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstimac Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I don't know if I see Thrash being that effective. He has always been a disappointment as a 1 or 2 receiver and was one of the reasons why Philly never got past the NFC championship. I think Gardner is going to want to make up for the lackluster season he had last year, and Jacobs also wants to make a name for himself. The Redskins are fairly deep at receiver, so I agree that there is a good chance there will not be a 1000 yrd receiver this year, especially with Portis probably getting the majority of snaps. I hope McCants is a TD machine again like he was last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I think Thrash will wind up the #4. At least I hope McCants and Gardner will step up enough this year. Some will depend on who plays QB. Somehow, I think if PR gets the majority of the snaps, McCants' stats will rise accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Of 320, I see it this way: Coles - 78 - 1125 - 6 Gardner - 70 - 900 - 6 Portis - 65 - 630 - 3 McCants - 27 - 315 - 4 Thrash - 24 - 280 - 1 Jacobs - 12 - 180 - 1 TE/H-Backs - 22 - 250 - 4 Rock/Morton/Betts - 22 - 240 - 2 This is going off the assumption that Coles and Portis both miss two games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I see McCants being used more in the red-zone, so his TD number will be 10 or more. I also have Coles catching 100+ passes this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I see Gardner being a lot more productive than that. He very well could push another 1,000 yard season again, and Im hoping Coles isnt injured, cause he easily could go over the top as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 I don;t see it being so evenly distributed, I see Coles getting a majority of it, followed by McCants who will beat out Garnder, then Thrash, Ports, Gardner, jacobs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFaninOKC Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 The number on Gardner, IMO, are way off. He will have close to 1000 yards receiving and at least 10 TD's, or should I say NO LESS than 10 TD's. While this is a bold prediction Coles is good enough that he will take away the attention from Gardner. Coles will get his and Gardner will be the beneficiary of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Remember, we're working off the guidelines of 320 completions, 3920 yards, and 27 TDs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVCChairman Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Coles : 74 - 1050 - 6 td's (3 over 20 yds) Gardner : 51 - 875 - 8 td's (2 over 20 yds) only reason i feel gardner has more td's is because of his size in the short field and redzone Thrash/Taylor/McCants : 100 - 1000 4 td's (3 over 20 yds) Portis : 45 - 375 - 4 H-Backs and TE's : 50 - 620 - 5 td's Just my "prediction" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.