StevieInferior Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 If true I am all for this trade!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jay Glazer (Sportsline)Deal might be done tonight With bonuses and base salary, Champ will get around $25 mil in the first 3 years of the deal Didn't say what the deal was, but when Tim Ring asked what Denver would do with their 1st, 2nd and the Skins 2nd, Glazer never said Denver wasn't getting the Skins 2nd. http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=10133 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parlett316 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 You want to watch the things Glazer says closely right now. The Skins are using Glazer to tweak Lenny. They are making kissy face with CBS Sportsline to cheese Lenny off. They gave him the Gibbs story. They may give him this too. If it's true that the Skins aren't giving up their No. 2 it means a very simple thing. It means we have a FIRM offer from someone else -- Jets perhaps -- that we've told Denver is just too good and they believed us . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 :jump: :jump: :jump: :jump: :jump: :jump: sounds much much better but this is Glazer.. he could still be wrong Then again Art is right he did get the Gibbs story first :jump: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 that's a double negative, and an intentional one it looks like. Never said Skins wereN'T giving up their second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsLegacy44 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Maybe a 3-way trade? Denver will probably get a 2nd.......perhaps not ours, which is ok with me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieInferior Posted February 24, 2004 Author Share Posted February 24, 2004 As Art alluded to, Glazer broke the Gibbs story, so he deserves some benefit of doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins26 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 if this is true ALL HAIL MR SNYDER!!!!!!! HURAHHHHHH!!!!!! :cheers: :notworthy :eaglesuck :dallasuck :gaintsuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCS:BraveCaringSoul Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I don't think that this quote: "but when Tim Ring asked what Denver would do with their 1st, 2nd and the Skins 2nd, Glazer never said Denver wasn't getting the Skins 2nd." Validates the conclusion you used in the title of this thread: "Glazer: No 2nd Rounder (Per orange Mane) " My reading is that, if anything, the original quote passively confirms that we ARE sending a 2nd round pick along with Champ to the Broncos. Am I missing something here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Originally posted by Ghost of Nibbs McPimpin that's a double negative, and an intentional one it looks like. Never said Skins wereN'T giving up their second. :doh: :doh: :doh: :gus: I missed that UGH... back to worring again :twitch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sire Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I couldn't find the glazer article but the straight up trade is far better than given away the high #2 pick too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieInferior Posted February 24, 2004 Author Share Posted February 24, 2004 no wonder I bombed the LSAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pr11fan Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Focus on the positive. The skins finally have a stud back who is also capable of taking it to the house on every touch.:applause: :applause: :applause: And no candidate doesn't count the dude is could be taken down by Deion Sanders and he's the slowest fast guy I've ever seen on a football field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnacpa Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I think that we will have to give up the 2nd pick to Denver because they know that we need to get rid of Bailey for Free Agency (cap room) and they don't. They have all the leverage. They also know that the likelyhood of us drafting a 1,500 yard back in the draft is slim to none, considering the Redskins have never had that before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Originally posted by Sire I couldn't find the glazer article but the straight up trade is far better than given away the high #2 pick too. me meither hmmmmmm :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins11 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 SteveInferior - you might want to change the title of the thread or something, now that the wording has been looked at closely. I can see people coming in crazy excited, only to experience a huge ****tease, as I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sire Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I have to question the validity of the updated status of this trade. Though the 25 million number lends some credibility. Can someone post the link to glazer's story? I am so tired of seeing the Jon Clayton's update on ESPN I am going to have nightmares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosko Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Amazing. Clinton Portis already has two 1500 seasons, and no Redskin has ever had one. You'll be getting a 2000 yard season soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCS:BraveCaringSoul Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Hold your horses there just may be some legs to this story after all. Just read this little tidbit on the hailredskins forum: "Jay Glazer on the Champ/Portis trade He said online and on Fox Sports that Denver is leaning towards just a straight up trade Champ for Portis. No second rounder draft pick included. There might be conditional picks involved on both sides, but that wouuld be next year's draft. If it's Champ for Portis: YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER. And the Post is saying that Portis and the skins are negotiating for a LONG term deal." http://www.hailredskins.com/vbforum/showthread.php?threadid=8921 EDIT: It just occured to me that the guy who wrote this at hailredskins might have used the original post on THIS thread as his source. Has anyone heard what Glazer actually said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Punani2 Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Originally posted by BCS: BadContractSexton Hold your horses there just may be some legs to this story after all. Just read this little tidbit on the hailredskins forum: "Jay Glazer on the Champ/Portis trade He said online and on Fox Sports that Denver is leaning towards just a straight up trade Champ for Portis. No second rounder draft pick included. There might be conditional picks involved on both sides, but that wouuld be next year's draft. If it's Champ for Portis: YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER. And the Post is saying that Portis and the skins are negotiating for a LONG term deal." http://www.hailredskins.com/vbforum/showthread.php?threadid=8921 That sounds better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCS:BraveCaringSoul Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 DISCLAIMER REGARDING MY LAST POST: It just occured to me that the guy who wrote this at hailredskins might have used the original post on THIS thread as his source. Has anyone heard what Glazer actually said? The uncertainty continues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yomar Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 Originally posted by BCS: BadContractSexton DISCLAIMER REGARDING MY LAST POST: It just occured to me that the guy who wrote this at hailredskins might have used the original post on THIS thread as his source. Has anyone heard what Glazer actually said? The uncertainty continues. not to mention 2 minutes later the same guy posted: "also: a radio station in Denver is saying that this deal is done. Champ and a #2 for Portis(and maybe a conditional pick next year)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCS:BraveCaringSoul Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I guess thats that with that then. I never read past the first post. The minute I saw it I copied and pasted it to this board. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 That sounds TONS better. If it included THIS YEAR'S 2nd round pick, I would be the first to call Snyder a BONEHEAD! Bosko, WHAT in God's name makes you think Portis will ever rush for 2000 yards? He would have to carry the ball around 365 times at 5.5 yards per carry to accomplish that. He doesn't have the frame, the weight and probably not the stamina. I would be perfectly happy with 1400-1600 yards per year for the next few years. I'll tell you what. I live in Colorado. I'm just assuming you do too. If Portis every gets 2000 yards, I'll buy you dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sire Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 The fact that reasonable numbers the 25mil for the 1st 3 years for Champ leads me to believe it may have been reported somewhere. The question is where? Here comes the same damn ESPN news story and soon Clayton again. It's time to sleep. BTW some of the bronco fans on orange mane are crazy. Then again half of the people on this site thing smoot is better than Champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.