slaga Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 What exactly was said that was bad at all. McKenna said she went on TV to speak well of her husband. That she dared say:Oh no... oh my god no. How could she. After he quoted Tanya Snyder, the next sentence is "Maybe his wife can find evidence of Snyder's growth and evolution. I can't. ..."He said the purpose of the interview was to "sell Dan's transformation" which is not exactly true and then he turns around and contradicts her. He is implying that Tanya is either wrong about her own husband or is lying. He had no reason to bring her into the article except to call her a liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailGreen28 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Wow. Just watched the video. link There are indeed three topics: Play 60 and Fit for You, her modeling, and Danny as an owner. The last 5 out of 12 minutes were about Dan Snyder. The reporter saying she went on TV just to pump up Danny? Partly false. People here saying she wasn't there to talk about Danny at all? Totally false. Oh, and she did make a false statement about his "growth". I don't blame her for saying it, especially for her husband, but this lawsuit makes her statement a lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyHolt Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Telemarketing is the lowest form of marketing. I cant believe its still legal to call people all hours of the day and hangup. He totally rode the internet bubble and punked everyone out and got the skins somehow. I wish we could take legal action against telemarketing companies. but they get a computer to call you ID blocked, and hang up during dinner, how the hell do we go after them. I wonder how many telemarketing calls he gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PortlandSkins Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Every legal minded site on the internet is howling with laughter at Mr. Snyder. This legal brief is bad enough to get a lawyer disbarred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killerbee99 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Just don't see how some have like a dying allegiance to this owner...the guy just sucks in public relations.......literally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKOALSKIN Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 I doubt he himself was forging thingsDo you know for a fact that the two of them do not love each other and her interest in him is only due to money? Seems to me you are either bitter or jealous You Canadians are a trip. We here in the USA pride ourselves on revolution. I know for a fact that danny is a short chubby unathletic Mfer and he's an *******. I know that Tanya is an ex model. You do the math on that one. If a guy has a ton of Loonies and a money grubber comes along. She will latch on to him like crabs on a Sailor. The fact that Snyder Comm had to pay 3 mill and was banned from operating in the state of FLA tells me that this forgery scam was running straight to the top. He's a scumbag with little man syndrome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.