HeHateMe Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 The early bye is the only thing that troubles me. I'd like it later in the season, as most would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 Well, Jerrah was too big a ***** to close the old, Toilet Stadium, against us for fear of the ass whupping he might get. So, why would anybody be surprised that he'd be too big a ***** to open the new, Toilet Stadium, against us. And yes, it's his choice.What's going to kill all Brokeback fans, is when we win the first Super Bowl hosted there. Yeah man, good theory. Only problem is New York won the Super Bowl two years back and one the East last year. The Giants are such an easy choice over the Skins. :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinthePRF Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Considering Dallas opponents, there is no way they could of made this schedule much easier or harder for them. Dallas does get the gift of getting their AFC West away games over with early in the season when they tend to play well. I think a lot of the reason Dallas gets so many primetime games is the amount of fans of other teams that like to watch them for the sole purpose of watching them go down as much as their nationwide bandwagon fan base that actually cheer for them. For fans of other teams, they probably top the list as the team you love to hate. Therefore more primetime games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Yeah man, good theory.Only problem is New York won the Super Bowl two years back and one the East last year. The Giants are such an easy choice over the Skins. :hysterical: Exactly, the Giants would be pretty much even money against the Pukes. So if they DID lose their home opener, it wouldn't be AS bad. Much less embarrassing than losing to your #1 rival who wouldn't even be favored against you. It's not so much about winning and losing, more about the image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMarco Murray 29 Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 Exactly, the Giants would be pretty much even money against the Pukes. So if they DID lose their home opener, it wouldn't be AS bad. Much less embarrassing than losing to your #1 rival who wouldn't even be favored against you. It's not so much about winning and losing, more about the image. Bingo. I think Jerry is seeing $$$ for the Opener instead of a Win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokie4redskins Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Hmm, I'm trying to be objective here. 2-14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HRNY4ZRNY Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 Cowgirls go 8-8 if they are lucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Depending on injuries... I think anywhere between 9-7 and 12-4 is likely. Romo sits to pee being out 3 games and then playing hurt the rest of the year cost them in 2008. Mind you, I have full confidence in Jason Garrett's ability to go pass happy, ignoring his 3 talented RBs, and pointing them in the direction of 7-9 while the fat man gets all the blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.