Horatio Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 http://bleacherreport.com/articles/133354-redskins-redefining-the-offseason#page/2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 He signed a three-year $4.5 million deal... Is that considered "spending big"? lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 History seems to be against Haynesworth, since everyone else who has signed with the Redskins for big money has failed to last their contracts or live up to them by any stretch. I'm guessing players like Portis and Moss, or Randy Thomas, aren't really included in their analysis (the first two being trades, anyway). I would think that Moss and Portis had bigger contracts than Patten did, though. Then again, they did mention Lloyd, so trades would seem to count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 I'm guessing players like Portis and Moss, or Randy Thomas, aren't really included in their analysis (the first two being trades, anyway). I would think that Moss and Portis had bigger contracts than Patten did, though.Then again, they did mention Lloyd, so trades would seem to count. just another hatchet job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 They will mention the free agents that help make their case. Not the productiveplayers we have acquired like Portis, Moss, Thomas, Washington, Springs, Griffin, Rabach, Fletcher, Carter (to an extent) etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 They will mention the free agents that help make their case. Not the productiveplayers we have acquired like Portis, Moss, Thomas, Washington, Springs, Griffin, Rabach, Fletcher, Carter (to an extent) etc. I agree...but they go too far when they say "everyone else who has signed with the Redskins for big money has failed to last their contracts or live up to them by any stretch"...especially since I still don't see Patten's contract to be "big money", or Armstead's contract if that wasn't a typo lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McD5 Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 just another hatchet job It gets old being the butt of everyone's jokes in the league. How many more seasons before Dan realizes this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Who cares anymore? We hear this every offseason. Untill we win a Superbowl, they'll keep writing. Frankly I'm numb to what the front office does anymore and what the media think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins:Victory_or_Death Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Who cares anymore? We hear this every offseason. Untill we win a Superbowl, they'll keep writing. Frankly I'm numb to what the front office does anymore and what the media think.:applause: I'm pretty much to the point where I can't feel my legs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onnie007 Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Who cares? What about London Fletcher, Portis, Moss, ..... Whatever, we win a SuperBowl and all this noise quiets down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGhost Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 i hate the comments on haynesworth... what does the way another player coming out of free agency have to do with the way he is going to perform? even if he sucks that's on him and isn't related to the other players who are NO LONGER ON THE TEAM... it was pointless to include him in the slideshow before he even steps on the field :saber: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.