stopmakingsense Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 play offs and homefield advantage in the wild card game. If Saunders stays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I'm still working on this whole "We" thing. I'll hope for some things, but not demand them. ,(well. Except some better beer at the games, but that's not Coach Williams deal there. )> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Paloffs or bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I am stunned by the replies in this thread. I know I'd love a magical season next year, but no matter what there are going to be some setbacks with the change. Just give the guy the team and see what happens. Don't demand anything!! It's the first year! For PETE'S sake, talk about pressure! I'm not sure I'd take the job of HC for any money if I read this thread.Well, that is the main advantage that looking at GW has. Continuity. Otherwise, he is a mid-level candidate. Of course the players want him. Their jobs are more secure, and they don't have to learn a new system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4skins23 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I won't expect much from him as coach. First season 5-11 and second season 7-9. He is a defensive coordinator, not a head coach. (Until he proves it.) I think Saunders will be gone because they don't get along. And the offense is where we need the most help. Williams can't provide that. If Saunders were to stay I think Williams would overrule a lot of his decisions and Saunders would walk on his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I think Saunders will be gone because they don't get along.Where is this coming from? I have only seen GW interviews where he has praised picking up Al. As far as the D being stuck on the field too long, I blame our inability to stop teams more than field position resulting from the O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4skins23 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Where is this coming from? I have only seen GW interviews where he has praised picking up Al. As far as the D being stuck on the field too long, I blame our inability to stop teams more than field position resulting from the O. Read it in an article. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other. They don't even talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Read it in an article. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other. They don't even talk.Do you have a link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinfan75 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 1st year not much.... but is he going to get the job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4skins23 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Where is this coming from? I have only seen GW interviews where he has praised picking up Al. As far as the D being stuck on the field too long, I blame our inability to stop teams more than field position resulting from the O. I am wrong. I have been searching for the article. I did run across 1 article, but it said they do seem to get along. but that it wouldn't suprise them if he were to can Saunders - or keep him. I am thinking I may have read it in one of our forums here. Not sure though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I am wrong. I have been searching for the article. I did run across 1 article, but it said they do seem to get along. but that it wouldn't suprise them if he were to can Saunders - or keep him. I am thinking I may have read it in one of our forums here. Not sure though. I've seen it here too, but it wasn't Andyman. You have to filter who says what. Hard for me to picture GW losing Saunders. One of the top things Gregg would have going for him would be continuity, and that's more important on Als side of the ball anyway. Without Saunders, I'm not such a GW backer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SearchHorizon Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 In this era of parity, making accurate predictions are impossible. I just want GW to show that he is making good decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SearchHorizon Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Too many pessimistic variables :mad: After the last 4 years, I would like to start with low exepctations. Seriously. By taking that approach this year, I have been much happier as a fan. Making the playoffs was like going to the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.