Zen-like Todd Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Incidentally, Allen is going to concede in about an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 LMAO!! Get real ok. Webb didn't do any growing up until the election. And his opponents didn't give a damn about promoting women in the military until the election. I doubt you did either. It was just the best way to attack the guy with the (D) next to his name. It's a tough world. Neither candidate in this race was close to perfect. One may be a sexist, but at least he has some substance and a ton of military experience. The other may be a racist, but more important, he is an empty suit with a pathetic legislative record. Easy choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Honest question. Do you really find Webb to be significantly sexist? And which bothers you more, Webb's statements on women in combat roles, or Allen's incidents of racial bias? Non troll response, please. I could honestly care less about either Maccacha or however it's spelled. BFD Webbs views on women in combat are my own, so again BFD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Punani Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Honest question. Do you really find Webb to be significantly sexist? And which bothers you more, Webb's statements on women in combat roles, or Allen's incidents of racial bias? Non troll response, please. I find them both very disturbing. When you have to choose between a racist and a sexist it doesn't bode well for the political system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 good, Allen is a racist pig anyway. I'm glad he's out of there! Mrs. Pink, you realize the alternative was a racist AND sexist ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 (Poster hereby inserts, by reference, all of the people's posts who claimed that absolutely nothing that Alberto Gonzales has ever said in a courtroom may be held against him, because when he advocated ignoring the Constitution he was simply arguing on behalf of his employer, and there's no proof that those opinions were actually his own.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.