gridironmike Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 man...pretty pricey for a guy with 35 receptions. He also had 44 punt returns for a 10.2-yard average and two touchdowns last season. He threw a touchdown in the Super Bowl. That is about 80 touches right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 He also had 44 punt returns for a 10.2-yard average and two touchdowns last season. He threw a touchdown in the Super Bowl. That is about 80 touches right there. He is also below a 50% completion rate when a ball is thrown at him. I really don't understand why people are enamored with a guy with 35 receptions and under 500 yards, its kinda crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMetal Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 OMFG...did they actually credit PFT as a source in that article?!?! 'Nuff said. That is utterly disgraceful. They'd be better off pulling stories from Extremeskins. WT just lost a LOT of credibility in my eyes. and there wasn't all that much to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Ryan thats some great JOURNALISM!!!! "Redskins Look at Randle El" Where? When? How? Nope....its If, Could, :blahblah: Awesome article Ryan... Awsome! :jerk: Oh yeah and the editor should be beaten with a 2x4 full of rusty nails for letting the headline read "Redskins Look At Randle El." He should have at least borrowed a "Could" from Ryan to insert in the headline. you speak the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 He'd be a return guy, nothing more, if he came here. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoyaSkins28 Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 I would love to have Randel El. But I would prefer Givens or Bryant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newera Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 He'd flourish here like Moss flourished here. Moss never put up the kinds of numbers he put up with us this year -- in all those years with the Jets. With Saunders calling the shots and the diversity of a guy like El, that would be scary. However, we probably won't be able to sign him. Geez, we still have to clear like $20 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 He'd flourish here like Moss flourished here. Moss never put up the kinds of numbers he put up with us this year -- in all those years with the Jets.With Saunders calling the shots and the diversity of a guy like El, that would be scary. However, we probably won't be able to sign him. Geez, we still have to clear like $20 million. Santana had a few good seasons with NYJ...Moss was twice the reciever Randle El is even before the B&G. Just because they are smallish, fast and return punts does not make them equally talented. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazhog Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 I don't see Randle El being of much benefit to our program... Sorry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tastes Like Chicken Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 Forget Randle El... Give us Koren Robinson or Sinorice Moss!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.