TheSchwartz Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I guess I'm not gonna understand the fixation with Hughes. Why do you think kickers in college are able to kick through the back of the end zone on kickoffs but NO ONE in the NFL does this? Does 5 yards make that big of a difference? No it's the rules put in place to keep kickers from launching footballs into the atmosphere. The balls are different and IIRC the tees are shorter. If Hughes couldn't kick off in college he sure as hell isn't gonna KO in the pros. It also means his career long of 53 in college, which was probalby only made with a tailwind, is probably equivalent to a 46/47 yarder with an NFL "K" ball. You are talking amax FG range of the 30 yard line. Which was basically Halls range when he was injured... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no1fanofno21 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 we should bring back novak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butz65 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Kicker is a priority. However it's one of the easiest positions to fill in the NFL (relative to value). No way the Skins should waste a draft pick on a kicker. They'll look for a free agent pick up. A #2 WR is a much harder position to fill. I'd like to see them go after some size even if it means giving up speed. Every team seems to need help at DE. Those guys will go quickly in free agency and the draft - hopefully the Skins will be able to pick a good player up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Yeah that might be an option, but I love my kickers with NFL experience. Kicking unfortunately is not kicking. There are plenty of good college kickers that flop in the pros. I'd prefer experience. I prefer experience as well but you have to have some type of competition in Training Camp. Young guys are the way to go in that respect. I'd love to have Nedney but he's missed some time with injuries over the past few years. I'm not so sure he's the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnFoRcEr_uPu Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I certainly think that field position is becoming underrated in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_U Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I understand that touchbacks are more difficult to come by these days, HOWEVER, Hall still struggled to boot it inside the 10. It was a regular basis for teams to begin their series between the 30-40 follwing a KO. Despite their excellent defense, theres till the issue of field position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 7, 2006 Author Share Posted February 7, 2006 I certainly think that field position is becoming underrated in the NFL. Definately. I would have loved to see our D with the opposing offense stuck within their own 5 a few more times this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNewU Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 just because novak won the seattle game does not mean we should bring him back, his kickoffs are even worse than Halls, worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 7, 2006 Author Share Posted February 7, 2006 just because novak won the seattle game does not mean we should bring him back, his kickoffs are even worse than Halls, worse. Oh yes, Nick "Kicks to Low" Novak.. Yeah just another in the long list of man crushes people have here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Definately. I would have loved to see our D with the opposing offense stuck within their own 5 a few more times this year. That almost never happens with kickoffs, since you can't kick it out of bounds. If you are speaking of punting, then it makes more sense. In that case, tho, Tupa can still do the job. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butz65 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Hard to find a kicker who can boot kickoffs through the end zone plus nail 40+ FG's with consistency. I'd rather have the guy who can boot the 40 plusers. Our kickoff coverage teams did a great job at the end of the season in keeping returns to a minimum on Hall's short kicks. Hopefully that will be the Skins focus in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Bring back our Terps punter who has been working out to get flexible and stronger. As much as we are paying for a kicker he should be able to get his kickoffs inside the 5 yd line heck kick them at a lower trajectory so there is a chance for a touchback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fdarugar Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 My plan is sure fire...cut Hall, sign Novak for short fgs and sign Janikowski after he gets cut and have him do kickoffs and long range fgs. The only flaw is kickers would take up two roster spots...and this will never happen, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinFan63 Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Kicker imo is a top priority as well.The Redskins simply cannot be giving away the field position battle as a default as they did so often this year. It costs games. Nedney would be a fine option. Punter should be addressed as well though I have little insight as to whom. Enough with the on - again- off again kickers. Let's lock these two positions down with solid reliable options and be done with it. ...and for goodness sake, can we see a touch back or two a game? No sh_t! Kickers do one thing.......kick. If you can't get us good field position, or make a 50 yrd field goal, then you're outta here! Hall is a BIG dissapointment to me. Kicking is more important then alot of ppl realize. With a much improved kicking game, this season would have been a different story. Hail!:point2sky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavy Jumbo Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 No sh_t!Kickers do one thing.......kick. If you can't get us good field position, or make a 50 yrd field goal, then you're outta here! Hall is a BIG dissapointment to me. Kicking is more important then alot of ppl realize. With a much improved kicking game, this season would have been a different story. Hail!:point2sky Don't be too hard on Hall. The guy did well for us before he injured himself. But there's no need to keep a guy that doesn't stay healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moondog Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 I swear i remember hall's first injury being an accident but the second one was supposedly due to him working too hard to recover and came more from overstress on his leg in the weight room. According to the team the staff will be paying closer attention to him and making sure he lifts accordingly to get back to where he was with the jets. Anybody that can kick in that stadium for new york can kick imo. That's why hall is so accurate and I think he only missed once inside the 40. We all know he can consistently hit 40- yarders all day long but its the 50 yarders that leave us wanting. I think he'll be good to go next year...it's the punting situation that really hurts us...aka the field position we are talking about. Zastudil would be a good pick up. I'd look to a punter that is a good option for kickoffs in case Hall still is unable to do that. IMO we are fine in terms of placekicking...just find a punter that can take over KO responsibilities as well. (easier said than done) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philal0102 Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 We Need depth o-line and d-line. we could make it through next season w/ out a 2nd Wr i agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey T Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 I have seen at least one team in the NFL this year that had two Ks. One for FGs and PATs, the other specialized in kicking off. That sucker nailed every one into the EZ without a return. The other team had to start at their 20 yard line after every KO. I thought to myself, 'how can a team afford that in todays salcap?'. Then, I thought to myself, 'with Hall and his weak KOs, why don't we do the same?' I like Hall as our K, but he sucks at kickoffs to the 10 or 15 YL. Maybe, if we had a long kicker for KOs, we could cut a few STers and pay for his salary. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 8, 2006 Author Share Posted February 8, 2006 That almost never happens with kickoffs, since you can't kick it out of bounds.If you are speaking of punting, then it makes more sense. In that case, tho, Tupa can still do the job. Jason You don't know that.. Not saying I do either, but like I said two or three times already in this thread, if you can upgrade key positions cheaply, then you do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 8, 2006 Author Share Posted February 8, 2006 I have seen at least one team in the NFL this year that had two Ks.One for FGs and PATs, the other specialized in kicking off. That sucker nailed every one into the EZ without a return. The other team had to start at their 20 yard line after every KO. I thought to myself, 'how can a team afford that in todays salcap?'. Then, I thought to myself, 'with Hall and his weak KOs, why don't we do the same?' I like Hall as our K, but he sucks at kickoffs to the 10 or 15 YL. Maybe, if we had a long kicker for KOs, we could cut a few STers and pay for his salary. :2cents: We're already short roster size that could have been used for another wide receiver last year. A second kicker would cripple us further imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 You don't know that.. Not saying I do either, but like I said two or three times already in this thread, if you can upgrade key positions cheaply, then you do it. Course, kickers are a hard position to upgrade, particularly when you already have a guy who is pretty good like Hall. Yes, I'm saying Hall is pretty good. The guy is money inside the 40, which people here seem to underrate. Yes, last year he couldn't make the long ones if he tried, but I think with current NFL rules that isn't nearly as critical as it once was, because when you miss, you give the opponent great field position. I mean, let's look at the Cowboys. They had problems all year filling the kicker position. When changing kickers, it never seems to go smoothly for teams, and they often struggle to find someone who does the job. This is why I'm more in favor of getting a young guy to handle kickoffs, if Hall can't do it. At least then, you get an extensive look at a young guy without having him hurt you in games. Course, if Hall gets healthy and gets some of his range back, this argument is moot, and we don't need to upgrade. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macd36 Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Well Tupa isn't getting any younger but if he's healthy, he's great. if they redo his contract he is a keeper IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Well Tupa isn't getting any younger but if he's healthy, he's great. He will be back for one season, at least.:helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 8, 2006 Author Share Posted February 8, 2006 He will be back for one season, at least.:helmet: Ok but what about after that? We have a chance this year to sign a good punter that has a ton of years left in him and would be good for us for a long time. I just think it makes sense, maybe I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art McDonough Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 Until we re-sign Ryan Clark and know the future of Sean Taylor we won't be able to assess our needs at safety. We also despirately need depth on the offensive line. These two areas may become more of a priority than a WR and DE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.