skinzalltheway Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 we need the ball in our playmakers how 'bout some reverses, reverse pass, hb pass, flea flicker or anything!!!1:point2sky:seahawksu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgun88 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 we should do the play that pittsburg ran against the bengals i guarentee you in would work ..... but instead a pitch to portis and send moss deep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSKN5 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I dont know about all those trick plays.. but maybe the flea flicker early in the game... and i also think the reverse to Moss is a good play that we should run at least once... just so they will respect it... its probably good for 10 yards at least once.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjcdaman Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Reverse to Moss once, and one halfback pass. Although, I have a feeling we might not use that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRay Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 we should do the play that pittsburg ran against the bengals i guarentee you in would work ..... but instead a pitch to portis and send moss deep You know what I was thinking the same thing something like the play the Steelers did against the Bengals that was a sweet play. I don't think they will try HB option pass two teams in the week they tried that already against The Bucs so the seahawks would be looking for that. It has to be a play that will totally catch them off guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worm Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 A lot of the plays you are asking for are designed against aggressive Defenses that send a lot of blitzes. Seahawks don't do that or can't. They don't blitz a whole lot becuase it would leave their secondary more vulnerable. I say let's shove it down their throats. GUT AND POWER!!! GO CP.. Yes I know they have the 5th ranked D against the run, but who did they have to stop this year? The teams with good rushing attacks they couldn't stop. See below Team Net Rushing Yards vs. Seahawks Jacksonville 119 Atlanta 115 Arizona 90 Washington 141 St. Louis 77 Houston 67 Dallas 164 Arizona 71 St. Louis 75 San Francisco 110 N.Y. Giants 166 Philadelphia 61 San Francisco 62 Tennessee 81 Indianapolis 43 Green Bay 68 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan1992 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 thats exactly my point!!!!!! good info to know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDETHEWALRUS Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Their D is fast and swarm to the ball, but they are very undersized. We should focus on pounding the hell out of them, eating clock and trying to bruise 'em up. Let the Dirt bags and CP do their jobs and we can win this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampSkinsFanatic Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh:shutup: :secret: Joe Gibbs is no dummy, he wants to win more than you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoSkins Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 How about a screen to Portis? We've seen a screen to Moss and Cooley, but never to Portis. I don't think the Skins have run that play all season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairmangao Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 I believe we ran a screen to Portis in the SD game. But he was lined up as a WR, so is that really a HB screen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHOPSkins Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Moss short cross Moss short cross Moss block for a sweep (not all at once) THEN....Moss touch block...streak....TD The fake screen to Moss would have worked but Brunells throw was off Tampa had a more agressive defense, we need more plays to set up the Killer GO SKINS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IheartGibbs Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 The flea flicker would seem like a good idea against that D, but we've tried it several times this season and haven't executed it well. A few reverses / fake reverses to Moss might be a better idea against that overagressive Seattle D. Congrads to me on my first post btw. :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeBB15 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 We do a quicksnap to Portis, and make it look like hes going to run, then just do a lob to Moss or Cooley whichever ones open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTillIDie Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 We ran the halfback toss early against Tampa, with Portis just narrowly missing. I am sure that he has been begging the coaches for another shot. Also, because we held such an early lead against Tampa, we really didn't use the large majority of the playbook that we had on offense (seeing as how we ran 66% of the time, much higher after our 14 point lead). I have a feeling that we would have seen a lot more trick plays, which also included that fake wr screen which just missed. If Seattle defenders seem to think that they have figured out exactly what we will do, as they have stated in the media, that Coach Gibbs will do the exact opposite of what they expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexxrev Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 how bout a roll out left (teams know how much we love to do that) with a misdirection shuffle pass to portis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin West Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Fake Bubble/Counter Draw. On 1. Break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.